Transforming post pandemic cancer servicesRound, Thomas; Sethuraman, Lakshman; Ashworth, Mark; Purushotham, Arnie
doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02596-9pmid: 38491174
This paper outlines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer services in the UK including screening, symptomatic diagnosis, treatment pathways and projections on clinical outcomes as a result of these care disruptions. A restoration of cancer services to pre-pandemic levels is not likely to mitigate this adverse impact, particularly with an ageing population and increased cancer burden. New cancer cases are projected to rise to over 500,000 per year by 2035, with over 4 million people living with and beyond cancer. This paper calls for a strategic transformation to prioritise effort on the basis of available datasets and evidence—in particular, to prioritise cancers where an earlier diagnosis is feasible and clinically useful with a focus on mortality benefit by preventing emergency presentations by harnessing data and analytics. This could be delivered by a focus on underperforming groups/areas to try and reduce inequity, linking near real-time datasets with clinical decision support systems at the primary and secondary care levels, promoting the use of novel technologies to improve patient uptake of services, screening and diagnosis, and finally, upskilling and cross-skilling healthcare workers to expand supply of diagnostic and screening services.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 7 (CDK7) inhibitors as a novel therapeutic strategy for different molecular types of breast cancerSong, Xue; Fang, Chen; Dai, Yan; Sun, Yang; Qiu, Chang; Lin, Xiaojie; Xu, Rui
doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02589-8pmid: 38355840
BACKGROUNDCyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 7 is aberrantly overexpressed in many types of cancer and is an attractive target for cancer therapy due to its dual role in transcription and cell cycle progression. Moreover, CDK7 can directly modulate the activities of estrogen receptor (ER), which is a major driver in breast cancer. Breast cancer cells have exhibited high sensitivity to CDK7 inhibition in pre-clinical studies.MethodsIn this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the latest insights into CDK7 biology and recent advancements in CDK7 inhibitor development for breast cancer treatment. We also discuss the current application of CDK7 inhibitors in different molecular types of breast cancer to provide potential strategies for the treatment of breast cancer.ResultsSignificant progress has been made in the development of selective CDK7 inhibitors, which show efficacy in both triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+). Moreover, combined with other agents, CDK7 inhibitors may provide synergistic effects for endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. Thus, high-quality studies for developing potent CDK7 inhibitors and investigating their applications in breast cancer therapy are rapidly emerging.ConclusionCDK7 inhibitors have emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy and have demonstrated significant anti-cancer activity in different subtypes of breast cancer, especially those that have been resistant to current therapies.
Low-dose aspirin use and risk of ovarian cancer: a combined analysis from two nationwide studies in Denmark and SwedenZheng, Guoqiao; Faber, Mette Tuxen; Wang, Jiangrong; Baandrup, Louise; Hertzum-Larsen, Rasmus; Sundström, Karin; Kjær, Susanne K.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02609-7pmid: 38347096
BackgroundStudies on association between low-dose aspirin use and ovarian cancer risk were mostly based on self-reported medication use and few had large enough sample size to investigate the potential modification effect by ovarian cancer risk factors.MethodsIn these two nationwide nested case-control studies among the Danish and Swedish female population, 11,874 women with ovarian cancer (30–84 years old) (Denmark: 7328 diagnosed in 2000–2019, Sweden: 4546 diagnosed in 2010–2018) were randomly age- matched with 473,960 female controls (293,120 from Denmark, and 181,840 from Sweden). We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) and combined the estimates based the fixed-effect assumption. Effect modification by inflammation-related risk factors and by indication (cardiovascular disease, CVD) were also investigated.ResultsEver use of low-dose aspirin was not strongly associated with the overall risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.92–1.03). However, the association differed according to parity (nulliparous: OR = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.70–0.92; parous: OR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.94–1.07; p-interaction = 0.0024), and according to history of CVD (no CVD: OR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.82–1.00; ever CVD: OR = 1.05, 95%CI: 0.97–1.13; p-interaction =0.0204).ConclusionsLow-dose aspirin use was associated with a decreased ovarian cancer risk especially in nulliparous women and in women without CVD diagnosis.
A prospective study of birth weight and prostate cancer risk and mortality in the Health Professionals Follow-up StudyLiu, Qinran; Zhang, Yiwen; Vaselkiv, Jane B.; Mucci, Lorelei A.; Giovannucci, Edward L.; Platz, Elizabeth A.; Sutcliffe, Siobhan
doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02593-ypmid: 38388857
BackgroundPrevious studies have observed inconsistent associations between birth weight and aggressive prostate cancer risk. This study aimed to prospectively analyse this association in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS).MethodsBirth weight was self-reported in 1994, and prostate cancer diagnoses were assessed biennially through January 2017 and confirmed by medical record review. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association between birth weight and prostate cancer risk and mortality.ResultsAmong 19,889 eligible men, 2520 were diagnosed with prostate cancer, including 643 with higher-grade/advanced stage, 296 with lethal, and 248 with fatal disease. Overall, no association was observed for increasing birth weight with risk of overall prostate cancer, lower-grade, and organ-confined disease. However, a borderline statistically significant positive trend was observed for increasing birth weight with risk of higher-grade and/or advanced-stage prostate cancer (adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj] per pound: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99–1.11; P-trend = 0.08), but no associations were observed with risk of lethal or fatal disease (HRadj: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.91–1.08; P-trend = 0.83; and HRadj: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.90–1.08; P-trend = 0.82, respectively).ConclusionNo consistent associations were observed between birth weight and prostate cancer risk or mortality in this 22-year prospective cohort study.
Risk of cancer and serious disease in Danish patients with urgent referral for serious non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer in Funen 2014–2021Grønnemose, Rasmus Birkholm; Hansen, Per Syrak; Worsøe Laursen, Søren; Gerke, Oke; Kjellberg, Jakob; Lykkegaard, Jesper; Thye-Rønn, Clara; Høilund-Carlsen, Poul Flemming; Thye-Rønn, Peter
doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02620-ypmid: 38409600
BackgroundIn 2011, as the first European country, Denmark introduced the non-organ-specific cancer patient pathway (CPP) for patients presenting with non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer (NSSC). The proportion of patients with cancer over time is unknown.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of all patients with a NSSC-CPP investigational course in the province of Funen to the Diagnostic Centre in Svendborg from 2014 to 2021 was performed to evaluate the proportion of patients with cancer and serious disease over time.ResultsA total of 6698 patients were referred to the NSSC-CPP of which 20.2% had cancer. While the crude referral rate increased from 114 per 100,000 people in 2014 and stabilised to around 214 in 2017–2021, the cancer detection rate of the total yearly new cancers in Funen diagnosed through the NSSC-CPP in DC Svendborg increased from 3 to 6%.ConclusionsWith now high and stable conversion and crude referral rates, the NSSC-CPP is one of the largest CPPs in Denmark as measured by the number of new cancer cases found. Similar urgent referral programmes in other countries might fill an unmet medical need for patients presenting with serious non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer in general practice.