Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2026 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

This site is protected by VikingCloud's Trusted Commerce program
      Home

    British Journal of Dermatology

    Subject:
    Dermatology
    Publisher:
    Oxford University Press — Oxford University Press
    ISSN:
    0007-0963
    Scimago Journal Rank:
    187

    2026

    Volume 195
    Supplement 1 (Jun)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 194
    Issue 6 (Feb)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2025

    Volume 194
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)
    Issue 2 (Oct)
    Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 193
    Supplement 3 (Dec)Supplement 2 (Oct)Supplement 1 (Jun)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 192
    Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 6 (Jan)Issue 5 (Jan)Issue 4 (Jan)

    2024

    Volume 193
    Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 192
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 191
    Supplement 3 (Dec)Supplement 2 (Aug)Supplement 1 (Jun)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)
    Volume 190
    Supplement 2 (Feb)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 6 (Feb)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)

    2023

    Volume 194
    Issue 6 (Nov)
    Volume 191
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 190
    Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 189
    Supplement 1 (Oct)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 188
    Supplement 4 (Jun)Supplement 3 (Jun)Supplement 2 (Jan)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 6 (Feb)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2022

    Volume 189
    Issue 3 (Oct)
    Volume 188
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 187
    S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 186
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2021

    Volume 185
    S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 184
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2020

    Volume 183
    S1 (Sep)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 182
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2019

    Volume 181
    S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 180
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2018

    Volume 179
    S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 178
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2017

    Volume 177
    S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 176
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2016

    Volume 175
    S2 (Oct)S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 174
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2015

    Volume 173
    S2 (Jul)S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 172
    S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2014

    Volume 171
    S4 (Sep)S3 (Sep)S2 (Sep)S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 170
    S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2013

    Volume 169
    S3 (Oct)S2 (Jul)S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 168
    S1 (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2012

    Volume 167
    S3 (Nov)S2 (Aug)S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 166
    S2 (Jun)S1 (Mar)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2011

    Volume 165
    S3 (Dec)S2 (Oct)S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 164
    S1 (May)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2010

    Volume 163
    S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 162
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2009

    Volume 161
    S3 (Nov)S2 (Aug)S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 160
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2008

    Volume 159
    S2 (Sep)S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 158
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2007

    Volume 157
    S2 (Dec)S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 156
    S3 (May)S2 (Apr)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2006

    Volume 156
    S1 (Dec)
    Volume 155
    S2 (Jul)S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 154
    S1 (May)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2005

    Volume 153
    S2 (Dec)S1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 152
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2004

    Volume 151
    S70 (Dec)S69 (Aug)S68 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 150
    S67 (May)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2003

    Volume 149
    S66 (Nov)S65 (Sep)S64 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 148
    S63 (May)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2002

    Volume 147
    S62 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 146
    S61 (Apr)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2001

    Volume 145
    S60 (Oct)S59 (Jun)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 144
    S58 (Apr)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2000

    Volume 143
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 142
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1999

    Volume 141
    S56 (Nov)S55 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 140
    S54 (Apr)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1998

    Volume 139
    S53 (Dec)S52 (Sep)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 138
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1997

    Volume 137
    S50 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 136
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1996

    Volume 135
    S49 (Oct)S48 (Sep)S47 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 134
    S46 (Jun)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1995

    Volume 133
    S45 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 132
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1994

    Volume 131
    S44 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 130
    S43 (Apr)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1993

    Volume 129
    S42 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 128
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1992

    Volume 127
    S41 (Sep)S40 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 126
    S39 (Feb)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1991

    Volume 125
    S38 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 124
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1990

    Volume 123
    S37 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 122
    S36 (Jun)S35 (Apr)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1989

    Volume 121
    S34 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 120
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1988

    Volume 119
    S33 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 118
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1987

    Volume 117
    S32 (Jun)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 116
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1986

    Volume 115
    S31 (Aug)S30 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 114
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1985

    Volume 113
    S29 (Jul)S28 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 112
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1984

    Volume 111
    S27 (Jul)S26 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 110
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1983

    Volume 109
    S25 (Jul)S24 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 108
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1982

    Volume 107
    S23 (Nov)S22 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 106
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1981

    Volume 105
    S21 (Sep)S20 (Aug)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 104
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1980

    Volume 103
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 102
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1979

    Volume 101
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 100
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1978

    Volume 99
    S16 (Dec)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 98
    S16 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1977

    Volume 97
    S15 (Dec)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 96
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1976

    Volume 95
    S14 (Dec)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 94
    S13 (Jul)S12 (Mar)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1975

    Volume 93
    S11 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 92
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1974

    Volume 91
    S10 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 90
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1973

    Volume 89
    S9 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 88
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1972

    Volume 87
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 86
    S8 (Jun)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1971

    Volume 85
    S7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 84
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1970

    Volume 83
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 82
    S6 (Jun)S5 (May)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1969

    Volume 81
    S4 (Aug)S3 (Jun)S2 (Mar)S1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1968

    Volume 80
    S5 (Sep)S4 (Aug)S3 (May)S2 (Mar)S1 (Feb)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1967

    Volume 79
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1966

    Volume 78
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1965

    Volume 77
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1964

    Volume 76
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1963

    Volume 75
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1962

    Volume 74
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1961

    Volume 73
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1960

    Volume 72
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1959

    Volume 71
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1958

    Volume 70
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1957

    Volume 69
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 7-8 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1956

    Volume 68
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 7-8 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1955

    Volume 67
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1954

    Volume 66
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1953

    Volume 65
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 7-8 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1952

    Volume 64
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 7-8 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1951

    Volume 63
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1950

    Volume 62
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 7-8 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1949

    Volume 61
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1948

    Volume 60
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 7-8 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1947

    Volume 59
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 4-5 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1946

    Volume 58
    Issue 11-12 (Nov)Issue 9-10 (Sep)Issue 7-8 (Jul)Issue 5-6 (May)Issue 3-4 (Mar)Issue 1-2 (Jan)

    1945

    Volume 57
    Issue 11-12 (Nov)Issue 9-10 (Sep)Issue 7-8 (Jul)Issue 5-6 (May)Issue 3-4 (Mar)Issue 1-2 (Jan)

    1944

    Volume 56
    Issue 11-12 (Nov)Issue 9-10 (Sep)Issue 7-8 (Jul)Issue 5-6 (May)Issue 3-4 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1943

    Volume 55
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1942

    Volume 54
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1941

    Volume 53
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1940

    Volume 52
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1939

    Volume 51
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1938

    Volume 50
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1937

    Volume 49
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1936

    Volume 48
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1935

    Volume 47
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1934

    Volume 46
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1933

    Volume 45
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1932

    Volume 44
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1931

    Volume 43
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1930

    Volume 42
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1929

    Volume 41
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1928

    Volume 40
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1927

    Volume 39
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1926

    Volume 38
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1925

    Volume 37
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1924

    Volume 36
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1923

    Volume 35
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1922

    Volume 34
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1921

    Volume 33
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1920

    Volume 32
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1919

    Volume 31
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1918

    Volume 30
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1917

    Volume 29
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1916

    Volume 28
    Issue 7-9 (Jul)Issue 4-6 (Apr)Issue 1-3 (Jan)

    1912

    Volume 24
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1911

    Volume 23
    Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1910

    Volume 22
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1908

    Volume 20
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1903

    Volume 15
    Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)

    1902

    Volume 14
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1901

    Volume 13
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)

    1898

    Volume 10
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)

    1896

    Volume 8
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1895

    Volume 7
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1892

    Volume 4
    Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)

    0001

    Volume 0001
    January
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    FC21 Sexual dimorphism in keratinocyte response to IL-36 cytokines

    2024 British Journal of Dermatology

    doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae360.021pmid: N/A

    Pustular psoriasis is a devastating subtype of psoriasis associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Pustular psoriasis is the only form of psoriasis that shows prominent sex bias, with the majority of cases found in women. Pustular psoriasis, and to a lesser extent plaque psoriasis, is characterized by the prominent involvement of the IL-36 family of cytokines, which consists of three pro-inflammatory cytokines: IL-36A, IL-36B and IL-36G, and the IL-36 receptor antagonist (IL-36RA/IL36RN). All three IL-36 members and the IL-36 receptor antagonist are increased (5- to 10-fold) in psoriatic skin. Single-cell and spatial-seq data demonstrated that IL-36 responses are primarily localized to the supraspinous compartment of the epidermis and strongly correlate with and act downstream of both IL-17A and TNF responses. CRISPR/Cas9 targeted knocking out of each IL-36 family member in keratinocytes demonstrates that both IL36G and IL36R KOs, but not IL36A KO, suppress both IL-17A and TNF responses (P < 0.001). Notably, the suppressive role of IL36G KO occurred in the absence of neutrophil proteases, which have been considered primary activators of the IL-36 axis in the skin. Bulk RNA-seq data from primary keratinocytes (n = 47) showed marked sex bias in IL-36G response, with female keratinocytes having a more robust pro-inflammatory response to IL-36G compared with male keratinocytes (P < 0.001). Furthermore, female keratinocytes showed higher expression of the type I IFN, IFNK (P < 0.001; FC-3.84), and IFN signature genes, such as MX1 (P < 0.001; FC-4.78), indicating an association between IFN-κ and the IL-36 axis in female keratinocytes. These data provide novel insights into IL-36 biology, demonstrate its role in amplifying IL-17 and TNF responses in the epidermis, and suggest that the sex bias of IL-36 response may contribute to the marked female bias of pustular forms of psoriasis.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    P98 Blood-based biomarkers of extracellular matrix turnover are elevated in patients with psoriasis compared with healthy controls

    2024 British Journal of Dermatology

    doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae360.128pmid: N/A

    The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a non-cellular network in all tissues and organs. Collagens are the most abundant proteins in the ECM, and their role is to maintain the tissue architecture of the different layers of the skin. Blood-based biomarkers of ECM fragments have previously been shown to be diagnostic and pharmacodynamic in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and spondylarthritis. This study aimed to investigate whether ECM biomarkers can differentiate between patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PSO) and healthy controls (HCs) and to determine the potential of ECM biomarkers as pharmacodynamic biomarkers in patients with PSO. This was a case–control study of patients with moderate-to-severe PSO, defined as psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) ≥8, not receiving systemic anti-psoriatic treatment at inclusion, and age-, sex- and body mass index-matched HCs. From each participant, EDTA plasma was collected at inclusion and 3–6 months after successful treatment response (defined as PASI ≤ 2 after treatment) with adalimumab. A panel of 11 ECM biomarkers was measured in EDTA plasma using validated ELISAs and Immunodiagnostic systems automated chemiluminescent assays. A P-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The differences in biomarker levels between patients with PSO and HC were analysed using an unpaired t-test. The pharmacodynamic effect in patients with PSO with successful treatment response (PASI ≤ 2), was analysed using a paired t-test. Pearson correlation was used to detect any potential association between biomarkers and PASI severity. The study comprised 59 patients with PSO and 52 HC. The median PASI among patients with PSO was 10.0 (8.0–36.8), and 15% (9 patients) had physician-diagnosed PsA. We observed significantly elevated levels of PRO-C3, assessing tissue fibrosis (P = 0.028), and PRO-C4, assessing epidermal basement membrane turnover (P = 0.014), in patients with PSO compared with HC. No differences were observed in the remaining biomarker levels between patients with PSO and HC. Furthermore, no correlations were identified between PASI and biomarker levels. A significantly elevated level of ELP-3 (P = 0.024), indicative of neutrophil activity and elastin degradation, was observed in the nine patients with PSO having PsA compared with HC. Notably, the successful treatment of nine patients with PSO using adalimumab did not significantly change PRO-C3 and PRO-C4 levels. The results demonstrated that the levels of PRO-C3 and PRO-C4 were elevated in patients with PSO compared with HC. However, treatment of psoriasis did not modulate these biomarkers. Our findings underline the need for further research to explore the potential of ECM biomarkers in psoriasis.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    P77 Bimekizumab in psoriatic disease: Exploring the fast onset, high level and durable clinical and molecular responses: design and rationale behind the exploratory, multicentre, open-label Phase 3b BE UNIQUE study

    2024 British Journal of Dermatology

    doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae360.107pmid: N/A

    Bimekizumab (BKZ) has shown rapid normalization of the psoriatic skin transcriptome and tissue-resident memory T-cell (Trm) signatures by Week (Wk)8, which may promote clinical response durability. Questions remain on the very early/longer-term effects of BKZ on key inflammatory pathways/mechanisms behind observed rapid, high, durable clinical responses in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We describe a study designed to investigate molecular/cellular changes associated with BKZ responses; we hypothesize that fast, durable, complete normalization of inflammatory biomarkers correlates with rapid, high, long-term clinical responses. BE UNIQUE is an ongoing multicentre Phase 3b study enrolling adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis [psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) ≥12, body surface area (BSA) ≥10%, IGA ≥3]: 40 without concomitant PsA (Cohort A), 40 with concomitant active PsA (Cohort B). Active PsA is defined as disease meeting Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis, ≥1 tender joint count and ≥1 swollen joint count (SJC). In Part 1, patients will receive BKZ 320 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) to Wk16, then Q8W to Wk48. In Part 2 (Wks48–96), patients with PASI = 0 [and low PsA activity for Cohort B (SJC≤1 and no increase in concomitant medications for PsA symptom treatment vs. baseline)] will be randomized 1:1 to BKZ Q8W or Q12W; patients with PASI >0 and/or without low PsA activity will continue on BKZ Q8W. Lesional skin biopsies will be taken at baseline/Wk1/48/96 and non-lesional skin biopsies at baseline/Wk48, with optional synovial tissue biopsy at baseline/Wk48 for Cohort B. Randomized patients with a PASI >3 during Part 2 will enter an escape period and receive BKZ Q8W to study end; a lesional skin biopsy will be taken on escape period entry, rather than Wk96. Biopsies will undergo transcriptomics. Blood samples will be collected. Baseline skin biopsies/blood samples will be taken from a matching Control Cohort (10 healthy individuals). Primary objective: assess gene expression score changes using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of skin biopsies, using preselected genes based on BKZ mechanism of action/psoriatic disease pathways, including CCL20/CXCL1/CXCL8/IL12B/IL17A/IL17C/IL17F/IL23A/IL36A/IL36G/KRT16/S100A7, alongside markers of tissue-specific T-cell populations, for example, Trms. Secondary objective: evaluate BKZ safety/tolerability. Exploratory objectives include investigating BKZ effect on skin and blood bulk/single cell/spatial transcriptomics, BKZ systemic effects on gene/protein expression and BKZ clinical response. BE UNIQUE will enable the exploration of mechanisms underlying rapid, high, durable clinical responses observed with BKZ treatment and whether clinical response durability is associated with molecular/cellular changes in skin, blood and joints in psoriatic disease.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    P31 Global epidemiology of psoriasis: Global Psoriasis Atlas 2024 update

    2024 British Journal of Dermatology

    doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae360.061pmid: N/A

    The WHO has highlighted the necessity of gaining a deeper understanding of the global burden of psoriasis. In response to this need, the Global Psoriasis Atlas was established to conduct comprehensive research into the global prevalence and incidence of psoriasis. We aimed to systematically review and present up-to-date data on the incidence of psoriasis, as well as to quantify its prevalence at global, regional, and country-specific levels. Literature searches were updated from 2019 to January 2024, resulting in 48 new studies. Among these, 13 studies reported incidence data, 7 reported only incidence, 6 reported both prevalence and incidence, and the remaining 35 studies reported only prevalence. In total, our updated prevalence analysis included 170 population-based epidemiological studies. A Bayesian hierarchical linear mixed model was employed to estimate the global, regional, and country-specific prevalence of psoriasis. Countries were mapped according to the global burden of disease (GBD) classification, considering geography and income. The data were fitted to a statistical model using Bayesian inference, sampling from a posterior distribution through a Hamiltonian Markov chain Monte Carlo method implemented in the RStanArm package in R (version 4.4.0). The updated review incorporated data from eight new countries and expanded to cover two additional GBD global regions. We observed a global increase in the prevalence of psoriasis, with some variations attributed to the significant expansion with the update of certain very sparse datasets. The crude lifetime prevalence for adults in high-income countries increased from 1.12% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39, 2.79] to 1.40% (95% CI: 0.52, 3.25). In the Latin America and Caribbean super-region, prevalence rates appear to have slightly decreased, but this finding is based on a very low evidence base, with no studies on psoriasis prevalence included from Caribbean countries. Most of the newly added studies were from high-income countries, with 70% originating from Western Europe, North America, and high-income Asian countries. The incidence of psoriasis varied from 23.14 per 100 000 person years in Taiwan to 321.0 per 100 000 person years in Italy. The incidence of psoriasis was higher in adults than in children. Seventy-six per cent of countries worldwide lack data on the epidemiology of psoriasis. The prevalence of psoriasis is higher in adults compared with children. Additionally, the distribution of psoriasis varies geographically, with higher frequency observed in high-income countries and regions with older populations. These estimates can assist countries and the international community in making informed public health decisions regarding the appropriate management of psoriasis and in monitoring changes over time.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    FC05 Circulating monocytes in psoriasis patients treated with apremilast reveal potential cardioprotective effects

    2024 British Journal of Dermatology

    doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae360.005pmid: N/A

    Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory condition characterized by inflamed plaques on the skin that is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) including myocardial infarction, hypercholesterolaemia, and hypertension. It is hypothesized that the systemic inflammation associated with psoriasis contributes to the development of CVD; however, the precise mechanism(s) and the impact of systemic therapy remain unknown. We previously demonstrated that circulating monocytes from individuals with psoriasis exhibit a hyperactivated adhesive transcriptional gene expression endotype. Additionally, patients with elevated monocyte doublets at baseline had normalization of these levels following treatment with apremilast. This suggests that aberrant adhesive monocytes contribute to CVD in psoriasis and that apremilast may not only be effective at treating cutaneous disease but may also have cardioprotective effects via monocyte modulation. Our goals were to (i) identify the top differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and associated pathways in psoriasis patients circulating CD14+ monocytes following treatment with apremilast through a prospective cohort study, and (ii) determine if psoriasis patients treated with apremilast have a lower relative risk of CVD vs. those treated with topical corticosteroid (TCS) alone through a retrospective cohort analysis. First, we conducted a prospective cohort study of 14 individuals with psoriasis where CD14+ monocytes were negatively selected from whole blood for transcriptome analysis at baseline and 16 weeks post-treatment. Next, a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX was utilized to determine if apremilast treatment in psoriasis is associated with a lower relative risk (RR) for developing CVD within 5 years compared with those receiving TCS. The top DEGs post-treatment included KCNS1, WNT4, and CASS4 (increased) and ID1, ENKUR, and PIM1 (decreased). Key pathways identified were macrophage differentiation, NADPH oxidase complex activation, and lipoprotein clearance. In the retrospective analysis, 9269 individuals in each group (apremilast vs. TCS) were matched for age, sex, body mass index, race, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, nicotine dependence, alcohol-related disorders, chronic kidney disease, aspirin, antilipemic agents and anticoagulation. Comparisons between individuals treated with apremilast vs. TCS revealed that apremilast treatment was associated with a lower RR of new-onset myocardial infarction (0.754; 0.606–0.939), cerebral infarction (0.667; 0.542–0.820), deep vein thrombosis (0.812; 0.662–0.997), and hypertension (0.702; 0.633–0.778). Concordant with the finding that apremilast modified monocytes lipoprotein clearance, apremilast treatment resulted in reduced risk of hypercholesterolaemia (0.671; 0.610–0.738) and elevated low-density lipoprotein (0.628; 0.532–0.742) relative to those receiving TCS alone. In conclusion, apremilast therapy reduces the risk of new-onset CVD, hypertension, and thrombotic events in individuals with psoriasis, which may be mediated by alteration of circulating monocyte reactive oxygen species and lipoprotein clearance.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    P52 Efficacy of guselkumab in bionaive psoriatic arthritis patients with severe disease activity: post hoc analysis of Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    2024 British Journal of Dermatology

    doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae360.082pmid: N/A

    The efficacy and safety of guselkumab, a fully human IL-23p19-subunit inhibitor, has been established in DISCOVER-1 and -2 studies. This post hoc analysis evaluates guselkumab efficacy through Week (W)100 in Bionaive psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients with severe disease activity (DA) based on a range of composite and patient-reported outcomes. In DISCOVER-2, Bionaive adults with active PsA (≥5 swollen and ≥5 tender joints, CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL) received (1:1:1) guselkumab 100 mg every 4W (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at W0, W4, Q8W; or placebo with crossover to guselkumab Q4W at W24. Severe DA was defined by clinical DA Index for PsA (cDAPSA >27), PsA DA Score (PASDAS ≥5.4), and patient global assessment (PtGA ≥80 mm) criteria. Least square mean (LSM) changes from baseline were estimated with mixed models for repeated measures, adjusted for treatment group, baseline outcome levels, and study stratification factors (baseline csDMARD use, high-sensitivity serum CRP). Among 739 DISCOVER-2 patients, 648 (88%), 639 (86%), and 218 (29%) met cDAPSA (mean = 49.5), PASDAS (mean = 6.8), and PtGA (mean = 89.0) criteria for severe DA. Baseline characteristics and treatment groups were generally consistent across severe DA cohorts, except guselkumab Q4W group had a higher proportion of males and dactylitis than placebo. In multivariate analyses, irrespective of the severe DA cohort, significantly greater improvements were observed in guselkumab-treated patients vs. placebo in all evaluated endpoints (largest effect observed in severe PtGA cohort). Guselkumab showed clinically meaningful improvements at W2 for cDAPSA (guselkumab Q4W: −5.9; Q8W: −7.2; placebo: −5.0) and W8 for PASDAS (guselkumab Q4W: −1.5; Q8W: −1.5; placebo: −0.9) and PtGA (guselkumab Q4W: −30.0; Q8W: −32.1; placebo: −17.4). The LSM differences between guselkumab Q4W/Q8W and placebo were enhanced through W24 across severe DA cohorts, at which time further improvements with guselkumab occurred, resulting in significant (P < 0.001) differences of −9.8/−9.0 for cDAPSA, −1.1/−1.1 for PASDAS, and −24.0/−20.2 for PtGA. Further improvements were observed through 2 years of guselkumab treatment in all evaluated outcomes (LSM difference from BL: ΔcDAPSA, ∼−36; ΔPASDAS, ∼−3.6; ΔPtGA, ∼−56) representing ∼73%, ∼53%, and ∼63% improvements in joint DA, PsA activity across domains, and patient-reported overall DA. Guselkumab demonstrated rapid (W2 for joint and W8 for overall DA) and clinically meaningful improvements in DA in Bionaive PsA patients with severe DA in a range of joint-focused and multi-domain outcomes; these improvements were further enhanced by W24 and sustained through 2 years. Overall, findings support the use of guselkumab in PsA patients with severe DA.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    P16 Journey of psoriasis registry in Nigeria (prince study)

    2024 British Journal of Dermatology

    doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae360.046pmid: N/A

    The prevalence of Psoriasis in African populations ranges from 0.05 to 1%, compared with 2–3% reported in Caucasian populations.1,2 Some postulate that the low prevalence in African studies may be due to missed or misdiagnoses as tinea corporis or non-specific dermatitis by non-dermatologists due to a scarcity of dermatologists and dermatopathologists.1,2 Information on psoriasis in Nigerians is needed, being the most populous dark-skinned nation in the world, as clinical and genetic variations could influence therapeutic approaches to its management. This project was to develop a psoriasis registry, the first in Nigeria, that will document psoriasis patients’ clinical, epidemiological and biochemical characteristics. Our Roadmap included developing the Psoriasis Registry team, writing the proposal, and seeking ethics clearance from the National Human Research and Ethics Committee of Nigeria and the committees at the participating centres. Investigators were trained on diagnosis, assessment, and instruments, including PASI, DLQI, and body surface area, as well as datasheets and protocols and data entry into the website https://psoriasis.org.ng. Bimonthly meetings are held to assess the challenges and progress. This collaborative effort comprised the principal investigator (PI), three co-PIs, and over 60 co-investigators from Dermatology clinics across Nigeria’s six geopolitical regions. The proposal and protocols have received approval from the National Human Research and Ethics Committee of Nigeria (NHREC/01/01/2007 – 08/11/202333). Data entry started in January, and we are about 6 months into the project. Preliminary results show about equal frequencies of psoriasis in both males and females. Chronic plaque psoriasis is the most common clinical type, and all the clinical types have been documented. This study, with the cohort developed, will form the foundation for further studies of psoriasis in Nigeria, particularly genetic studies. It will potentially improve the understanding and management of psoriasis across Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones and the skin of colour population.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    FC20 Automating psoriasis area and severity index assessment from real-world images using Vision Transformers

    2024 British Journal of Dermatology

    doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae360.020pmid: N/A

    The psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) is the gold standard for assessing psoriasis severity but is time-consuming, subjective, poorly reproducible, and requires face-to-face interaction between clinician and patient. Automating PASI assessments using deep learning-based image analysis may provide a more objective, efficient measure of disease severity in trial and real-world settings. Most studies have used Convolutional Neural Networks.1 However, Vision Transformers (ViTs) are sophisticated deep learning models that have shown unprecedented capabilities in image analysis, including classifying skin lesions from dermoscopic images and 3D image (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging scan) analysis. We sought to develop and evaluate a ViT model for automated PASI using images. Following consent, adults with chronic plaque psoriasis were recruited via a UK national specialized psoriasis service (04/2021–05/2024). Professional studio photographs (five standardized views) and self-taken photographs (three views) were captured. Two blinded, independent face-to-face physician PASI measures were recorded, with the first rater used as the primary reference value. Fitzpatrick Skin Type and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) were also noted. We trained our ‘MultiViT’ model over 300 epochs and tested using an 80:20 split of the participants. MultiViT advances beyond standard ViTs by handling multiple images and resolutions simultaneously. Mean absolute error (MAE) was used to assess prediction accuracy and compare the standard ViT models with the MultiViT. We captured 1109 images from 152 participants; 63% were male, median age of 45.5 years [interquartile range (IQR) 33.75–57.0], median body mass index of 29.68, 84% Fitzpatrick Skin Types I–IV, and 16% V and VI. The majority (76%) had mild-to-moderate disease (PGA ≤3); median PASI was 8.2 (IQR 5.7–12.7). The MultiViT model demonstrated an MAE of 3.88 for predicting PASI from skin images vs. 5.13 for the standard ViT. When stratified by skin type, I–IV performed better than V and VI (MAE of 2.80 and 8.17, respectively), and by disease severity, PGA ≤3 performed better than PGA >3 (MAE of 1.97 and 9.13, respectively). Our findings suggest the MultiViT model offers potential for automated psoriasis severity assessments from skin images, with favourable prediction accuracy despite a small dataset. An expanded and more diverse (Fitzpatrick Skin Type, severity) dataset will enable further refinement, validation and testing of the MultiViT model in trial and real-world settings. Future integration into a smartphone application will facilitate self-monitoring of psoriasis and healthcare efficiency for improved health and cost outcomes in psoriasis.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    P70 The 1-year all-cause drug survival of bimekizumab compared with other biologics in psoriasis: a nationwide real-world cohort study

    2024 British Journal of Dermatology

    doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae360.100pmid: N/A

    Bimekizumab was approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in August 2021. Bimekizumab is the only biologic that exerts specific inhibition of interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F. Few real-world studies have assessed the drug survival of bimekizumab. We assessed the 1-year all-cause drug survival of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor adalimumab, the IL-12/23 inhibitor ustekinumab, the IL-17 inhibitors secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, and bimekizumab, and the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab. We used data on adult patients with psoriasis that were extracted from a nationwide prospective psoriasis database in February 2024. Survival functions were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for the a priori-defined covariates age, sex, body weight, psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and previous number of biologics. Proportional hazards and linearity were assessed using the cumulative residuals. If the proportionality assumption was violated, we explored the time-varying effects of covariates. We included 4165 patients with 6554 treatment series. There were 3064 treatment series with adalimumab, 1498 with ustekinumab, 856 with secukinumab, 555 with ixekizumab, 195 with brodalumab, 192 with bimekizumab, and 194 with guselkumab. The crude 1-year all-cause drug survival was highest for bimekizumab (83.7%) followed by ustekinumab (79.2%), guselkumab (76.5%), ixekizumab (73.9%), adalimumab (71.4%), secukinumab (70.1%), and brodalumab (60.3%). In the Cox proportional hazards model, we found that bimekizumab had a significantly lower discontinuation hazard than all the other investigated biologics except guselkumab [HR, 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76–2.09]. Compared with bimekizumab, the HR was 1.55 (95% CI, 1.00–2.39) for ixekizumab, 1.56 (95% CI, 1.03–2.38) for ustekinumab, 2.25 (95% CI, 1.48–3.43) for secukinumab, 2.61 (95% CI, 1.65–4.13) for brodalumab, and 2.65 (95% CI, 1.75–4.01) for adalimumab. The analysis found that sex and PsA had time-varying effects. The hazard was 135% higher for females compared with males (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.95–2.84) in the first 100 days and, among those still on treatment after 100 days, the HR decreased to 1.57 (95% CI, 1.40–1.78). In the first 100 days, PsA was protective (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56–0.86) but PsA had no protective effect for those still on treatment after 100 days (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.86–1.11). In conclusion, bimekizumab had the highest 1-year all-cause drug survival compared with adalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab but not guselkumab. Data on the long-term drug survival of bimekizumab, as well as the drug survival associated with effectiveness and safety, are needed.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    FC30 Precision biologic dosing in psoriasis: development, validation and beta-testing of a therapeutic drug monitoring dashboard

    2024 British Journal of Dermatology

    doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae360.030pmid: N/A

    Following the advent of biologic therapies for chronic plaque psoriasis, achieving clear/nearly clear skin (disease control) has become a realistic goal. Patients currently continue high-cost biologic therapy indefinitely once they have achieved disease control, which leads to a long-term drug and healthcare burden. Clinical trial data indicate that some individuals can maintain disease control with less frequent doses, especially those who have higher serum drug concentrations, indicating a role for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in guiding dosing decisions. To enable real-world implementation of TDM-guided precision dosing of biologics, we developed, validated, and beta-tested an online interactive TDM dashboard, powered by a pharmacokinetic (PK) model. We searched for population PK models of the exemplar psoriasis biologic risankizumab in PKPDAI and PubMed databases. We externally validated the PK model using an independent multicentre real-world UK psoriasis dataset (n = 50 patients, BSTOP study) prior to embedding it within an online R Shiny interactive dashboard. Two rounds of beta-testing of the TDM dashboard were performed with healthcare professionals to assess usability. A two-compartment PK model with first-order absorption and elimination processes was identified. The PK model was based on Phase I–III trial data and adopted a nonlinear mixed effects approach (13 123 observations from 1899 patients; 71% male; median age, 47; median weight, 97 kg; Suleiman et al., Clin Pharmacokinet 2019). We integrated the model into an online R Shiny interactive dashboard, which generates a personalized dosing interval for risankizumab. The model is used as a Bayesian prior, to predict individual patient parameters using their serum drug concentrations, dose history and other covariates (weight, serum concentrations of anti-drug antibody, albumin and creatinine). Individual predictions were externally validated (mean absolute error 0.95 mg/L; mean percentage error 17.6%; root mean square error 1.7 mg/L; R2 0.8). Beta-testing sessions with 29 clinicians (58% female; mean age 41; 33% doctor; 42% nurse) from 8 UK dermatology centres showed above-average usability of the dashboard (mean System Usability Scale score 72/100, rating ‘good’). All participants evaluated the dashboard as user-friendly and rated it acceptable or completely acceptable. Mean time to generate a dosing interval using the dashboard was 1.9 min (SD 1.2). Mean time to generate a dosing interval using the dashboard was 1.9 min (SD 1.2). Our study provides a novel pipeline for the implementation of TDM-enabled precision dosing of biologics in real-world practice. Our user-friendly online TDM dashboard has the potential to incorporate other biologic therapies and can be extended across disease contexts (including non-response and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases) for maximal real-world health benefits and cost saving.

    Showing 1 to 10 of 162 Articles

    Previous12345…17Next
    Articles per page
    Browse All Journals

    Related Journals:

    DermatologyInternational Journal of DermatologyClinical and Experimental DermatologyEuropean Journal of DermatologyJDDG - Journal of the German Society of DermatologyJournal of Dermatological TreatmentJournal of Cosmetic DermatologyBMC DermatologyDermatology Research and PracticeCase Reports in Dermatology