Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2026 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

This site is protected by VikingCloud's Trusted Commerce program
      Home

    British Journal of Surgery

    Subject:
    Surgery
    Publisher:
    BJS Society — Oxford University Press
    ISSN:
    0007-1323
    Scimago Journal Rank:
    210

    2026

    Volume 113
    Supplement 6 (Jul)Supplement 5 (Jun)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2025

    Volume 113
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 112
    Supplement 17 (Dec)Supplement 16 (Dec)Supplement 15 (Dec)Supplement 14 (Nov)Supplement 13 (Aug)Supplement 12 (Aug)Supplement 11 (Aug)Supplement 10 (Jun)Supplement 9 (May)Supplement 8 (May)Supplement 7 (May)Supplement 6 (Mar)Supplement 5 (Feb)Supplement 4 (Feb)Supplement 3 (Jan)Supplement 2 (Jan)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2024

    Volume 112
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 111
    Supplement 9 (Nov)Supplement 8 (Sep)Supplement 7 (Aug)Supplement 6 (Jul)Supplement 5 (May)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2023

    Volume 111
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 110
    Supplement 10 (Dec)Supplement 9 (Dec)Supplement 8 (Nov)Supplement 7 (Aug)Supplement 6 (Aug)Supplement 5 (Jun)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)

    2022

    Volume 110
    Issue 9 (Dec)Issue 8 (Dec)Issue 7 (Nov)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 109
    Supplement 9 (Dec)Supplement 8 (Nov)Supplement 7 (Oct)Supplement 6 (Aug)Supplement 5 (Aug)Supplement 4 (Jul)Supplement 3 (Jun)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Jun)Issue 9 (May)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)

    2021

    Volume 109
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 108
    Supplement 9 (Dec)Supplement 8 (Nov)Supplement 7 (Oct)Supplement 6 (Oct)Supplement 5 (Jul)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Apr)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (May)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Mar)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2020

    Volume 108
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 107
    Supplement 3 (Jun)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 13 (Sep)Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Jul)Issue 9 (Jun)Issue 8 (Apr)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Feb)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2019

    Volume 106
    Supplement 7 (Nov)Supplement 6 (Sep)Supplement 5 (Sep)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (Mar)Supplement 2 (Feb)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Jul)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2018

    Volume 105
    Supplement 6 (Nov)Supplement 5 (Aug)Supplement 4 (Jul)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2017

    Volume 104
    Supplement 7 (Sep)Supplement 6 (Jul)Supplement 5 (Jun)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (Apr)Supplement 2 (Jan)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2016

    Volume 103
    Supplement 7 (Sep)Supplement 6 (Aug)Supplement 5 (Jul)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (Apr)Supplement 2 (Feb)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Aug)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2015

    Volume 102
    Supplement 7 (Sep)Supplement 6 (May)Supplement 5 (Apr)Supplement 4 (Mar)Supplement 3 (Jan)Supplement 2 (Feb)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2014

    Volume 102
    Supplement 1 (Dec)
    Volume 101
    Supplement 6 (Nov)Supplement 5 (May)Supplement 4 (Apr)Supplement 3 (Feb)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2013

    Volume 100
    Supplement 8 (Sep)Supplement 7 (Jul)Supplement 6 (Jun)Supplement 5 (May)Supplement 4 (Apr)Supplement 3 (Mar)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 13 (Nov)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2012

    Volume 99
    Supplement 7 (Jul)Supplement 6 (Jun)Supplement 5 (May)Supplement 4 (Apr)Supplement 3 (Feb)Supplement 2 (Feb)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2011

    Volume 99
    Supplement 1 (Dec)
    Volume 98
    Supplement 8 (Nov)Supplement 7 (Oct)Supplement 6 (Jun)Supplement 5 (May)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (Jun)Supplement 2 (Apr)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2010

    Volume 98
    Supplement 1 (Dec)
    Volume 97
    Supplement 6 (Nov)Supplement 5 (Dec)Supplement 4 (Jun)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2009

    Volume 96
    Supplement 6 (Oct)Supplement 5 (May)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (Apr)Supplement 2 (Nov)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2008

    Volume 95
    Supplement 7 (Aug)Supplement 6 (May)Supplement 4 (Jul)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2007

    Volume 94
    Supplement 5 (Aug)Supplement 3 (Jul)Supplement 2 (Apr)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2006

    Volume 93
    Supplement 3 (Sep)Supplement 2 (Jan)Supplement 1 (May)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 4
    Issue 14 (Mar)

    2005

    Volume 92
    Supplement 1 (Apr)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 80
    Issue 3 (Dec)
    Volume 68
    Issue 10 (Dec)
    Volume 67
    Issue 6 (Dec)
    Volume 66
    Issue 4 (Dec)
    Volume 64
    Issue 7 (Dec)
    Volume 61
    Issue 6 (Dec)
    Volume 60
    Issue 5 (Dec)

    2004

    Volume 91
    Supplement 1 (Jun)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2003

    Volume 90
    Supplement 1 (May)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2002

    Volume 89
    Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Dec)Issue 10 (Nov)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Nov)Issue 7 (Nov)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 88
    Issue 3 (Dec)

    2001

    Volume 88
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2000

    Volume 87
    Supplement 1 (Jun)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1999

    Volume 86
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1998

    Volume 85
    Supplement 2 (Jul)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1997

    Volume 84
    Supplement 2 (Jun)Supplement 1 (May)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1996

    Volume 83
    Supplement 2 (Nov)Supplement 1 (Jun)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1995

    Volume 82
    Supplement 1 (Nov)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1994

    Volume 81
    Supplement 1 (Oct)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1993

    Volume 80
    Supplement 1 (Sep)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1992

    Volume 79
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1991

    Volume 78
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1990

    Volume 77
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1989

    Volume 76
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1988

    Volume 75
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1987

    Volume 74
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1986

    Volume 73
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1985

    Volume 72
    Supplement 1 (Sep)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1984

    Volume 71
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1983

    Volume 70
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1982

    Volume 69
    Supplement 6 (Dec)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1981

    Volume 68
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1980

    Volume 67
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1979

    Volume 66
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1978

    Volume 65
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1977

    Volume 64
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1976

    Volume 63
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1975

    Volume 62
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1974

    Volume 61
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1973

    Volume 60
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1972

    Volume 59
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1971

    Volume 58
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1970

    Volume 57
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1969

    Volume 56
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1968

    Volume 55
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1967

    Volume 54
    Issue 13 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1966

    Volume 53
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1965

    Volume 52
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1964

    Volume 51
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1963

    Volume 50
    Issue 227 (Nov)Issue 226 (Sep)Issue 225 (Jul)Issue 224 (May)Issue 223 (Mar)Issue 222 (Jan)

    1962

    Volume 50
    Issue 221 (Nov)Issue 220 (Sep)Issue 219 (Jul)
    Volume 49
    Issue 218 (May)Issue 217 (Mar)

    1961

    Volume 49
    Issue 216 (Dec)Issue 215 (Nov)Issue 214 (Sep)Issue 213 (Jul)
    Volume 48
    Issue 212 (May)Issue 211 (Mar)Issue 210 (Jan)

    1960

    Volume 48
    Issue 209 (Nov)Issue 208 (Sep)Issue 207 (Jul)
    Volume 47
    Issue 206 (May)Issue 205 (Mar)Issue 204 (Jan)

    1959

    Volume 47
    Issue 203 (Nov)Issue 202 (Sep)Issue 201 (Jul)
    Volume 46
    Issue 200 (May)Issue 199 (Mar)Issue 198 (Jan)

    1958

    Volume 46
    Issue 197 (Nov)Issue 196 (Sep)Issue 195 (Jul)
    Volume 45
    Issue 194 (May)Issue 193 (Mar)Issue 192 (Jan)

    1957

    Volume 45
    Issue 191 (Nov)Issue 190 (Sep)Issue 189 (Jul)
    Volume 44
    Issue 188 (May)Issue 187 (Mar)Issue 186 (Jan)

    1956

    Volume 44
    Issue 185 (Nov)Issue 184 (Sep)Issue 183 (Jul)
    Volume 43
    Issue 182 (May)Issue 181 (Mar)Issue 180 (Jan)

    1955

    Volume 43
    Issue 179 (Nov)Issue 178 (Sep)Issue 177 (Jul)
    Volume 42
    Issue 176 (May)Issue 175 (Mar)Issue 174 (Jan)

    1954

    Volume 42
    Issue 173 (Nov)Issue 172 (Sep)Issue 171 (Jul)
    Volume 41
    Issue 170 (May)Issue 169 (Mar)Issue 168 (Jan)

    1953

    Volume 41
    Issue 167 (Nov)Issue 166 (Sep)Issue 165 (Jul)
    Volume 40
    Issue 164 (May)Issue 163 (Mar)Issue 162 (Jan)

    1952

    Volume 40
    Issue 161 (Nov)Issue 160 (Sep)Issue 159 (Jul)
    Volume 39
    Issue 158 (May)Issue 157 (Mar)Issue 156 (Jan)

    1951

    Volume 39
    Issue 155 (Nov)Issue 154 (Sep)Issue 153 (Jul)
    Volume 38
    Issue 152 (Apr)Issue 151 (Jan)

    1950

    Volume 38
    Issue 150 (Oct)Issue 149 (Jul)
    Volume 37
    Issue 148 (Apr)Issue 147 (Jan)

    1949

    Volume 37
    Issue 146 (Oct)Issue 145 (Jul)
    Volume 36
    Issue 144 (Apr)Issue 143 (Jan)

    1948

    Volume 36
    Issue 142 (Oct)Issue 141 (Jul)
    Volume 35
    Issue 140 (Apr)Issue 139 (Jan)

    1947

    Volume 35
    Issue 138 (Oct)Issue 137 (Jul)
    Volume 34
    Issue 136 (Apr)Issue 135 (Jan)

    1946

    Volume 34
    Issue 134 (Oct)Issue 133 (Jul)
    Volume 33
    Issue 132 (Apr)Issue 131 (Jan)

    1945

    Volume 33
    Issue 130 (Oct)Issue 129 (Jul)
    Volume 32
    Issue 128 (Apr)Issue 127 (Jan)

    1944

    Volume 32
    Issue 126 (Oct)Issue 125 (Jul)
    Volume 31
    Issue 124 (Apr)Issue 123 (Jan)

    1943

    Volume 31
    Issue 122 (Oct)Issue 121 (Jul)
    Volume 30
    Issue 120 (Apr)Issue 119 (Jan)

    1942

    Volume 30
    Issue 118 (Oct)Issue 117 (Jul)
    Volume 29
    Issue 116 (Apr)Issue 115 (Jan)

    1941

    Volume 29
    Issue 114 (Oct)Issue 113 (Jul)
    Volume 28
    Issue 112 (Apr)Issue 111 (Jan)

    1940

    Volume 28
    Issue 110 (Oct)Issue 109 (Jul)
    Volume 27
    Issue 108 (Apr)Issue 107 (Jan)

    1939

    Volume 27
    Issue 106 (Oct)Issue 105 (Jul)
    Volume 26
    Issue 104 (Apr)Issue 103 (Jan)

    1938

    Volume 26
    Issue 102 (Oct)Issue 101 (Jul)
    Volume 25
    Issue 100 (Apr)Issue 99 (Jan)

    1937

    Volume 25
    Issue 98 (Oct)Issue 97 (Jul)
    Volume 24
    Issue 96 (Apr)Issue 95 (Jan)

    1936

    Volume 24
    Issue 94 (Oct)Issue 93 (Jul)
    Volume 23
    Issue 92 (Apr)Issue 91 (Jan)

    1935

    Volume 23
    Issue 90 (Oct)Issue 89 (Jul)
    Volume 22
    Supplement 1 (Jun)Issue 88 (Apr)Issue 87 (Jan)

    1934

    Volume 22
    Issue 86 (Oct)Issue 85 (Jul)
    Volume 21
    Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 84 (Apr)Issue 83 (Jan)

    1933

    Volume 21
    Issue 82 (Oct)Issue 81 (Jul)
    Volume 20
    Supplement 32 (Apr)Supplement 31 (Apr)Supplement 30 (Apr)Supplement 29 (Apr)Issue 80 (Apr)Issue 79 (Jan)

    1932

    Volume 20
    Issue 78 (Oct)Issue 77 (Jul)
    Volume 19
    Issue 76 (Apr)Issue 75 (Jan)

    1931

    Volume 19
    Supplement 28 (Jan)Supplement 27 (Jan)Supplement 26 (Jan)Supplement 25 (Jan)Issue 74 (Oct)Issue 73 (Jul)
    Volume 18
    Supplement 24 (Jan)Supplement 23 (Jan)Supplement 22 (Jan)Supplement 21 (Jan)Issue 72 (Apr)Issue 71 (Jan)

    1930

    Volume 18
    Issue 70 (Oct)Issue 69 (Jul)
    Volume 17
    Supplement 20 (Jan)Supplement 19 (Jan)Issue 68 (Apr)Issue 67 (Jan)

    1929

    Volume 17
    Supplement 18 (Oct)Supplement 17 (Jan)Issue 66 (Oct)Issue 65 (Jul)
    Volume 16
    Supplement 16 (Jan)Supplement 15 (Jan)Supplement 14 (Jan)Supplement 13 (Jul)Issue 64 (Apr)Issue 63 (Jan)

    1928

    Volume 16
    Issue 62 (Oct)Issue 61 (Jul)
    Volume 15
    Issue 60 (Apr)Issue 59 (Jan)

    1927

    Volume 15
    Issue 58 (Oct)Issue 57 (Jul)
    Volume 14
    Supplement 8 (Apr)Supplement 7 (Apr)Supplement 6 (Apr)Supplement 5 (Apr)Issue 56 (Apr)Issue 55 (Jan)

    1926

    Volume 14
    Issue 54 (Oct)Issue 53 (Jul)
    Volume 13
    Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 52 (Apr)Issue 51 (Jan)

    1925

    Volume 13
    Issue 50 (Oct)Issue 49 (Jul)
    Volume 12
    Issue 48 (Apr)Issue 47 (Jan)

    1924

    Volume 12
    Issue 46 (Oct)Issue 45 (Jul)
    Volume 11
    Issue 44 (Apr)Issue 43 (Jan)

    1923

    Volume 11
    Issue 42 (Oct)Issue 41 (Jul)
    Volume 10
    Issue 40 (Apr)Issue 39 (Jan)

    1922

    Volume 10
    Issue 38 (Oct)Issue 37 (Jul)
    Volume 9
    Issue 36 (Jan)Issue 35 (Jul)

    1921

    Volume 9
    Issue 34 (Jan)Issue 33 (Jul)

    1920

    Volume 8
    Issue 32 (Jan)Issue 31 (Jan)Issue 30 (Jan)Issue 29 (Jul)

    1919

    Volume 7
    Issue 28 (Jan)Issue 27 (Jan)Issue 26 (Jan)Issue 25 (Jul)

    1918

    Volume 6
    Issue 24 (Jan)Issue 23 (Jan)Issue 22 (Jan)Issue 21 (Jul)

    1917

    Volume 5
    Issue 20 (Jan)Issue 19 (Jan)Issue 18 (Jan)Issue 17 (Jul)

    1916

    Volume 4
    Issue 16 (Jan)Issue 15 (Jan)Issue 14 (Jan)Issue 13 (Jan)

    1915

    Volume 3
    Issue 12 (Jan)Issue 11 (Jan)Issue 10 (Jan)Issue 9 (Jan)

    1914

    Volume 2
    Issue 8 (Jan)Issue 7 (Jan)Issue 6 (Jan)Issue 5 (Jul)

    1913

    Volume 1
    Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jul)

    0020

    Volume 106
    January
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    772 Assessing the Impact of Gaming Skills on Robotic Surgical Skill Acquisition and Learning Curves

    Ike, D I; Asemota, N; Jacob, A; Okorocha, C; Stamenkovic, S

    2024 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae163.048pmid: N/A

    Robotic surgery has rapidly advanced across various medical specialties over the past decade. Extensive research has confirmed the benefits of robotic surgery, leading to improved surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Historically, only highly experienced consultants in laparoscopic and open surgery received training in robotic surgery to the detriment of junior surgical trainees.Virtual reality simulators have introduced gamification to enhance surgical skills. Studies have shown that individuals with gaming experience, musical aptitude, and sports backgrounds exhibit improved psychomotor skills relevant to surgery, including hand-eye coordination, reaction time, and visuospatial awareness. Despite this, there is a lack of research on how gaming and musical abilities impact robotic surgical skill acquisition and learning curves.This prospective, observational, and comparative study involved 15 novice surgeons with no prior robotic experience recruited from various UK medical institutions. Participants were divided into two groups based on their video game experience.While statistical significance was not reached (p 0.26), an observed trend favoured the gaming cohort's performance (M 56.29, SD 57.85) on the robotic surgical simulator compared to the non-gamer group (M 38.41, SD 46.77) possibly due to the limited sample size. Gamers exhibited notably superior reaction time scores (p 0.037) Additionally, gamers demonstrated enhanced overall performance in spatial reasoning and the Beat Saber game, assessing hand-eye coordination, though these differences did not reach statistical significance.This study suggests that video gaming experience may provide novice surgeons with certain advantages when beginning training on the high-fidelity dVSS robotic surgical simulator. Further research with larger participant groups may confirm these findings.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    392 Artificial Intelligence Approach in Hip Prosthesis Identification and Assessing Radiographic Outcome Measures

    Soteriou, I; Hadjixenophontos, S; Musbahi, O; Jones, G; Pouris, K; Cobb, J

    2024 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae163.447pmid: N/A

    AimRadiographic assessment is crucial for the success of a hip replacement procedure as an accurately positioned prosthesis indicates favourable long-term outcomes. This project aims to develop a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based method that can: (1) automatically identify the presence of a hip resurfacing prosthesis in radiographs and (2) calculate the radiographic neck-shaft angle (NSA) of the prosthesis from two-dimensional plane images using both anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral x-rays with high accuracy.MethodUsing a computer vision and pattern recognition algorithm, the femur shaft and prosthesis regions were identified, and their respective angles were extracted for NSA calculation. A neural network (NN) was then trained using clinician-generated AP radiograph NSAs as ground truths and AI-generated AP and lateral NSAs as features. Spearman's correlation and Kruskal-Wallis tests were calculated to explore any significant association between the final AI-generated and clinician-generated AP x-ray NSAs. Mean absolute error (MAE) and R-squared values were calculated with and without the NN model to identify the model's accuracy and variability.ResultsThere was a statistically significant correlation between the final AI-generated AP x-ray NSAs and the clinician-generated AP x-ray NSAs (rs=0.83,p=0.00). MAE and R2 without the NN were 3.09 and 0.37 respectively. MAE and R2 with the NN were 1.94 and 0.53 respectively.ConclusionsThe results of this study demonstrate that the identification of hip resurfacing prostheses using artificial intelligence is feasible. By incorporating additional features such as the lateral NSA, the model can provide an accurate prediction of the AP radiographic NSA, closely approximating the ground truth.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    294 Does the Initial Antibiotic Choice Affect the Incidence of Post-Operative Collections in Paediatric Appendicitis?

    Manoharan, M; Alrasad, R; Chatterjee-Woolman, S; Peeraully, R; Shepherd, G; Shenoy, M

    2024 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae163.160pmid: N/A

    IntroductionIn appendicitis, antibiotics are routinely commenced prior to consideration of operative management. The choice of initial regimen depends on local antimicrobial guidelines. The presence of resistant organisms risks development of post-operative collections.In our tertiary paediatric surgery unit, antimicrobial guidelines were changed in September 2022 to recommend co-amoxiclav instead of cefuroxime/metronidazole. This study compares incidence of post-operative collections before and after the policy change.MethodPatients who underwent appendicectomy between September 2021 and October 2023 were identified and contemporaneous data collected. Patients who had initial surgery elsewhere, interval/incidental appendicectomies or penicillin allergy were excluded. Comparison was made between patients receiving cefuroxime/metronidazole (Group 1) or co-amoxiclav (Group 2).ResultsOver the 26-month period, there were 104 patients in Group 1 (after excluding 47) and 104 in Group 2 (after excluding 46). 4 (3.8%) developed collections in Group 1 versus 13 (12.5%) in Group 2. In Group 1, 2 (50%) were treated with antibiotics alone, 1 (25%) required drain insertion and 1 (25%) had a laparotomy. In Group 2, 7 (54%) were treated with antibiotics alone, 5 (38%) required drain insertion and 1 (8%) had a laparotomy. The relative risk of developing a post-operative collection was 3.3 (p=0.023) in Group 2 versus Group 1.ConclusionsThe change in antimicrobial policy resulted in a significant increase in post-operative collections in our unit. This provides evidence that a regimen of cefuroxime/metronidazole is more effective at preventing collections and we are liaising with our Microbiology department with a view to amend the guidelines.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    163 Laparoscopic Surgery: Good for the Patient, Bad for the Surgeon. A Systematic Narrative Review

    Abimbola, A; Quiney, G; Colucci, G

    2024 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae163.137pmid: N/A

    BackgroundMusculoskeletal (MSK) injuries are very common among laparoscopic surgeons. These injuries can result in physician burnout, early retirement, and medical/surgical treatment. The aims of this study are to identify the causes of MSK injuries in laparoscopic surgeons, the most common injuries, and strategies to prevent them.MethodFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, Medline, Embase and PubMed databases were systematically searched for relevant articles using the predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data was extracted by two independent reviewers.ResultsA total of 321 papers were found, after screening 41 papers were selected for inclusion. Many study designs involved the use of biomechanical methods, surveys, and quality of life questionnaires. Studies varied drastically in their sample sizes. Results show that long periods of static postures held in non-ergonomic positions are a significant contributing factor to MSK injuries. This is more likely in laparoscopic surgery, as surgeons hold more fixed positions with more physical demand when compared with open surgery. Studies show that the most common sites for injury are the neck, back and shoulder.ConclusionsMSK injuries are an ongoing problem which is often underestimated and poorly reported. There was clear evidence in the literature that microbreaks and strength training is beneficial, and that ergonomic training should be a standard element of surgical training.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    260 Barriers to the Delivery of Obstetric Care Within Primary Health Centres (PHC) in India- a Scoping Review

    Veerappan, V; Kundu, S; Arora, H; Virk, S; Goshal, R; Gadgil, A; Raykar, M

    2024 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae163.126pmid: N/A

    AimThis scoping review aimed aims to identify challenges in delivering obstetrics care within PHCs in India, using the 6 WHO healthcare building blocks.MethodA literature search covered PubMed, MEDLINE databases, and Google Scholar. Studies published from 2012 to 2022, discussing PHC-based obstetrics care in India, were included based on predefined criteria. Title, and full-text screenings were conducted using Covidence, involving 2 reviewers for screening and 1-2 reviewers for conflict resolution. Data extraction on the 6 WHO building blocks was performed by 4 reviewers.ResultsTwenty-two studies were included for final review, mostly cross-sectional (59%), mainly from the state of Bihar (23%). Service delivery (77%) and health workforce (73%) were the most extensively discussed building blocks. Leadership and governance were the least discussed (14%). Challenges in service delivery encompassed limited antenatal care uptake, inadequate emergency obstetrics care and adjunct services, inadequate infrastructure, equipment and space and poor transport, and onward referral services. Health workforce issues included staffing levels and competency and training deficiencies in existing staff.ConclusionsThis review highlights significant challenges in obstetrics care delivery within Indian PHCs in India, primarily related to service delivery and health workforce. Our scoping review identified literature gaps within the four building blocks outside service delivery and health workforce, and geographical literature gaps from the Northeast of India. PHCs play a crucial role in the equitable delivery of obstetrics services that can reach the most underserved population across India. It is imperative that surgical and obstetrics plan strategies include primary care within them.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    1224 Signs & Symptoms Predictive of CSF Shunt Dysfunction in Children & Young People Presenting to ED

    Aldabbagh, Y; Riaz, S; Wiffin, R; Hollingworth, M

    2024 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae163.487pmid: N/A

    AimTo investigate signs and symptoms in children and young people (CYP), with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts, presenting to a CYP emergency department (ED) with onsite paediatric neurosurgical facilities; and assess their association with 30-day shunt revision rate.MethodRetrospective analysis of CYP (<17 years old) with CSF shunts presenting to the CYP ED. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the relationship between patient characteristics, presenting signs and symptoms, and 30-day shunt revision rate.ResultsWe analysed 107 presentations between 03/11/2021 and 25/10/2022. 42% of patients were female with a mean age of 5.64 years. The most common shunt aetiologies included tumour (30%) and intraventricular haemorrhage (30%). Vomiting (37%), reduced alertness (27%), and behaviour change (27%) were the most common symptoms. 13% of patients underwent shunt revision within 30 days of presentation. No individual sign or symptom was highly sensitive, with the most sensitive being headache (64%) and vomiting (64%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that ≥2 (two or more) previous shunt revisions, fever, pallor, headache, and surgical site swelling, were significantly more common in those who underwent shunt revision (p<0.05). However, only headache and shunt site swelling were independently predictive using multivariate analysis (p<0.05).ConclusionsCYP with CSF shunts present with complex symptomatology. Number of shunt revisions, headache, and shunt site swelling were predictive of shunt revision at 30 days. Understanding and integrating key predictors of CSF shunt failure into the diagnostic pathway is essential for improving efficiency and minimising the impact on CYP and their families.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    1292 Surgical Immersion in Endoscopy with a Clinical and Leadership Fellow

    Babikir, A; Banerjee, S; Boulton, R

    2024 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae163.654pmid: N/A

    AimThe effectiveness of immersion training in endoscopy for surgical trainees has not been documented previously and we aimed to assess the impact at a busy gastrointestinal surgical unit within London. This involved providing the surgical registrars with a week of endoscopy training every month, during which time their clinical duties would be covered by an appointed clinical leadership fellow – externally funded by HEE.MethodSurgical trainees currently rotating at Queen’s Hospital Surgical unit are each enrolled in endoscopy immersion and assigned a week per month with prior notice to hand over their clinical duties to the clinical fellow. During the immersion week, the surgical registrar is exposed to hands-on training, simulator access, and interactive sessions with experienced endoscopists.ResultsThree surgical trainees were enabled access since September 2023 to immersion training. Another trainee mentioned performing around 6-7 colonoscopies per day during immersion to a total of 65 in two weeks. A third trainee has attended a total of 8 endoscopy lists in 1 week. He competed 28 colonoscopies and 2 OGD’s, achieving TI intubation in 4, caecal intubation in 18.ConclusionsThe feedback supports the efficacy of immersion week as a valuable adjunct to traditional surgical training. Integration of immersion weeks into the curriculum can potentially optimize the training pathway for surgical registrars allowing them to achieve the required numbers for CCT and building competencies. Study leave blocks for endoscopy training could also be an alternate option.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    131 Acute Injury of The Ulnar Collateral Ligament: Does Ultrasound Get a Thumbs Up?

    Burton, H; Goodarzi, M; Chalmers, R

    2024 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae163.495pmid: N/A

    Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries of the thumb constitute frequent trauma presentations. While clinical assessment proves valuable, instances arise in equivocal cases where imaging aids in determining optimal management. This project aims to assess the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound in identifying UCL injuries.A retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing online medical records system. Patients from the last five years who underwent thumb ultrasounds were identified and inclusion criteria encompassed: acute thumb injuries accompanied by ultrasounds indicative of full-thickness UCL tears and/or Stener lesions.Fifty patients who underwent ultrasounds for acute thumb injuries with UCL concerns were identified. 31 were excluded with normal results or incomplete data. The remaining 19 patients had ultrasound reported complete UCL tears and/or Stener lesions and subsequently underwent operative intervention. The average age was 38.7 years; 58% were female. The median duration from presentation to ultrasound scan was 2 days, and from presentation to surgery was 4.5 days. Eleven patients (63%) exhibited a confirmed complete UCL tear during surgery; 6 patients (37%) had a normal intact UCL. Consequently, the positive predictive value of ultrasound in detecting acute UCL tears within this cohort was 63%.It is known that accuracy of US is operator dependent and with over a third of patients in our cohort being identified as having false positive result following surgery, relying on US findings to proceed to surgery must be cautioned. It remains a valuable non-invasive investigation. For cases where the clinical picture is indeterminate, MRI is now our modality of choice.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    165 Schools Engagement Will Improve Equality and Diversity Within Orthopaedics and Surgery

    Schenk, E; Maggs, R; Franklin, M

    2024 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae163.035pmid: N/A

    AimInclusivity and diversity of individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds is unequal within surgery. Diversification of the workforce is a requirement for the future of surgery to ensure high quality patient care is provided (Hassan, 2023). The School’s Engagement Session, originating with the British Hip Society and replicated with British Orthopaedic Association (BOA), aimed to introduce the idea of a career in medicine or surgery to children from non-selective state schools.MethodThree school groups, twenty-four students and three staff members, attended day three of the annual BOA conference. Highly engaging medical student presentations, industry stand activities, and hands-on consultant led surgical based stations sparked interest and provided ‘work-experience’ opportunities; an increasingly challenging pre-requisite for applicants to acquire. Resources, lunch, and room availability were all supported by the BOA.ResultsDirectly addressing students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds about a career in surgery, which many had not previously considered, stimulated their interest in this as a career. Feedback from accompanying educators, acknowledged their lack of insight regarding accessibility, and students explicitly demonstrated the positive impact of these in-person engagement events. Many students explained how this newly acquired knowledge had empowered the possibility of pursuing a medical career.ConclusionsReplication of this highly successful event demonstrated the impact of engagement with individuals from diverse backgrounds upon future surgical diversity. Nationwide reproducible events are therefore warranted to reduce inequality in medicine and surgery. Medical student through to consultant involvement with future engagement work will diversify and sustain the surgical workforce within the UK.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    221 A Ward-Based Intervention to Improve Understanding of ‘Enhanced Recovery After Surgery’, and Improve Compliance with Early Post-Operative Mobilisation: A Prospective Audit

    Babu, S; Lee, R E; Allen, S; Dowson, H

    2024 British Journal of Surgery

    doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae163.210pmid: N/A

    AimEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) improves short-term post-operative outcomes by maintaining pre-operative function and reducing the stress response associated with surgery. Early post-operative mobilisation is a key component. This study sought to assess achievement of early mobilisation goals, identify barriers to mobilisation, and improve awareness of ERAS.MethodEye-catching posters were placed within view of each surgical bedspace and on the door of each bathroom. These emphasised the benefits of early mobilisation and simple steps a patient may take to improve their post-operative outcomes. Between May to July 2023 (Baseline; n=47), and August to September 2023, (Post-intervention; n=46) data were prospectively collected on adult patients who were day one post-elective or emergency general surgery.ResultsUnfamiliarity with the concept of ERAS, as well as inadequate post-operative analgesia were identified as barriers to early post-operative mobilisation. Following the implementation of ward-based educational posters, there was a 36% increase in the number of patients who were aware of the concept of ERAS (10% to 46%). 31% of patients were able to recall at least two benefits of early mobilisation as highlighted by the posters. Requests for analgesia increased by 29%. There was a 24% increase in the number of patients sitting out of bed for meals. Furthermore, completion of the recommended 4 x 60m walks also improved (77% to 87%).ConclusionsA simple ward-based intervention resulted in heightened awareness of Enhanced Recovery and the importance of early post-operative mobilisation as well as improved compliance to the local post-operative mobility goals.

    Showing 1 to 10 of 774 Articles

    Previous12345…78Next
    Articles per page
    Browse All Journals

    Related Journals:

    Annals of SurgeryPlastic and Reconstructive SurgeryJAMA SurgerySurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional TechniquesWorld Journal of SurgeryAnnals of Plastic SurgeryLangenbeck's Archives of SurgeryAesthetic Plastic SurgeryFacial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic MedicineMicrosurgery