Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2026 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

This site is protected by VikingCloud's Trusted Commerce program
      Home

    Journal of Animal Science

    Subject:
    Animal Science and Zoology
    Publisher:
    Oxford University Press
    ISSN:
    0021-8812
    Scimago Journal Rank:
    164

    2026

    Volume 104
    Supplement 4 (Jul)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (Apr)JuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary

    2025

    Volume 104
    Supplement 1 (Dec)DecemberNovember
    October
    September
    August
    June
    Volume 103
    Supplement 3 (Oct)Supplement 2 (Jun)Supplement 1 (May)DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary

    2024

    Volume 103
    DecemberNovemberSeptemberAugust
    Volume 102
    Supplement 3 (Sep)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Mar)DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary
    Volume 101
    Supplement 3 (Jan)December

    2023

    Volume 102
    DecemberNovember
    Volume 101
    Supplement 3 (Nov)Supplement 2 (Oct)Supplement 1 (May)DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruaryJanuary

    2022

    Volume 101
    DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptember
    Volume 100
    Supplement 4 (Oct)Supplement 3 (Sep)Supplement 2 (Apr)Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jun)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2021

    Volume Advance Article
    NovemberOctoberSeptemberSeptemberAugustJulyJuneMayAprilMarchFebruary
    Volume 100
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 99
    Supplement 3 (Oct)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (May)Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2020

    Volume Advance Article
    JuneAprilMarchMarchFebruary
    Volume 2020
    March
    Volume 99
    Issue 2 (Dec)
    Volume 98
    Supplement 4 (Nov)Supplement 3 (Nov)Supplement 2 (Nov)Supplement 1 (Aug)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2019

    Volume Advance Article
    DecemberDecemberNovemberOctoberMayApril
    Volume 97
    Supplement 3 (Dec)Supplement 2 (Jul)Supplement 1 (Jul)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2018

    Volume Advance Article
    Issue 7 (May)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 5 (Feb)
    Volume 96
    Supplement 3 (Dec)Supplement 2 (Apr)Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2017

    Volume 95
    Supplement 4 (Aug)Supplement 2 (Mar)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2016

    Volume 95
    Supplement 1 (Dec)
    Volume 94
    Supplement 6 (Nov)Supplement 5 (Oct)Supplement 4 (Sep)Supplement 3 (Sep)Supplement 2 (Apr)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2015

    Volume 93
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2014

    Volume 92
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2013

    Volume 91
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 88
    Issue 2 (Feb)

    2012

    Volume 90
    Supplement 4 (Dec)Issue 13 (Dec)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2011

    Volume 89
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2010

    Volume 88
    Supplement 13 (Apr)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2009

    Volume 87
    Supplement 14 (Apr)Supplement 13 (Apr)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2008

    Volume 86
    Supplement 14 (Apr)Supplement 13 (Mar)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2007

    Volume 85
    Supplement 13 (Mar)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2006

    Volume 84
    Supplement 13 (Apr)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2005

    Volume 83
    Supplement 13 (Jun)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2004

    Volume Advance Article
    March
    Volume 82
    Supplement 13 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2003

    Volume 81
    Issue 15_suppl_3 (Mar)Issue 14_suppl_2 (Feb)Issue 13_suppl_1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2002

    Volume Advance Article
    June
    Volume 80
    E-suppl_1 (Jan)E (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2001

    Volume 79
    Supplement E (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2000

    Volume 79
    E (Dec)
    Volume 78
    Supplement 3 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 77
    Supplement E (Jan)

    1999

    Volume 77
    Supplement 3 (Jan)Supplement 2 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1998

    Volume 76
    Supplement 3 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1997

    Volume 75
    Supplement 2 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1996

    Volume 74
    Supplement 3 (Jan)Supplement 2 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1995

    Volume 73
    Supplement 2 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1994

    Volume 72
    Supplement 3 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1993

    Volume 71
    Supplement 3 (Jan)Supplement 2 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1992

    Volume 70
    Supplement 2 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1991

    Volume 69
    Supplement 3 (Jan)Supplement 2 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1990

    Volume 68
    Supplement 2 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1989

    Volume 67
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1988

    Volume 66
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1987

    Volume 65
    Supplement 2 (Jan)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 64
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1986

    Volume 63
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 62
    Supplement 2 (Jan)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1985

    Volume 61
    Supplement 3 (Jan)Supplement 2 (Jan)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 60
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1984

    Volume 59
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 58
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1983

    Volume 57
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 56
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1982

    Volume 55
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 54
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1981

    Volume 53
    Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)
    Volume 52
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1980

    Volume 51
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 50
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1979

    Volume 49
    Supplement II (Jan)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 48
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1978

    Volume 1978
    Symposium (Sep)
    Volume 47
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 46
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1977

    Volume 45
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 44
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1976

    Volume 43
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 42
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1975

    Volume 41
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 40
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1974

    Volume 39
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 38
    Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1973

    Volume 1973
    Symposium (Jan)
    Volume 37
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 36
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1972

    Volume 35
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 34
    Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1971

    Volume 1971
    Symposium (Jan)
    Volume 33
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 32
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1970

    Volume 31
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 30
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1969

    Volume 29
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 28
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1968

    Volume 27
    Symposium (Aug)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1967

    Volume 26
    Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)

    1966

    Volume 25
    Supplement (Jan)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1965

    Volume 24
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1964

    Volume 23
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1963

    Volume 22
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1962

    Volume 21
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)

    1961

    Volume 20
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1960

    Volume 19
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1959

    Volume 18
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1958

    Volume 17
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1957

    Volume 16
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1956

    Volume 15
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1955

    Volume 14
    Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1954

    Volume 13
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1953

    Volume 12
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1952

    Volume 11
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1951

    Volume 10
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)

    1950

    Volume 9
    Issue 1 (Feb)

    1949

    Volume 8
    Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1948

    Volume 7
    Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)

    1947

    Volume 6
    Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (May)

    1946

    Volume 5
    Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1945

    Volume 4
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1944

    Volume 3
    Issue 3 (Aug)

    1943

    Volume 2
    Issue 1 (Feb)

    1942

    Volume 1
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Aug)

    1940

    Volume 1940
    Issue 1 (Dec)

    1931

    Volume 1931
    Issue 1 (Jan)

    1930

    Volume 1930
    Issue 1 (Jan)

    1929

    Volume 1929
    Issue 1 (Jan)
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    GAMETOGENIC PROCESSES AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO NORMAL AND ABNORMAL CONCEPTUS DEVELOPMENT

    SCHUETZ, ALLEN, W.

    1979 Journal of Animal Science

    doi: 10.1093/ansci/49.Supplement_II.1pmid: 400775

    Summary THE relationship between gametogenesis and conceptus development has been described in relation to recent experiments concerning selected aspects of the cellular and molecular basis of differentiation of female and male gametes. Evidence suggests that a variety of hormonal and nonhormonal mechanisms or combinations thereof have evolved and control distinct stages of oocyte maturation process. Analyses of the meiotic maturation process with particular emphasis on amphibians, indicate that distinct cytoplasmic factors are produced or activated in response to a hormonal stimulus which initiates germinal vesicle breakdown and reinitiates the meiotic maturation process. Evidence suggests that certain cytoplasmic factors originate in the nucleus and (or) cytoplasm and that considerable cytoplasmic maturation proceeds in the absence of the nucleus, or as a result of nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions. Cytoplasmic factor(s) or activities affect many aspects of oocyte function and structure, including the cell membrane, chromosomes, nucleus and meiotic spindle. Ions also play a crucial role in gamete differentiation either alone or in combination with hormones or these cytoplasmic factors. The relevance of these findings to oocyte maturation and fertilization, activation and embryonic development is discussed. In many cases, similar types of biological activities exist in widely separated species and (or) are effective in widely different species. The importance of synchronization of normal gametes to the development of the embryos is discussed. It is proposed, and the evidence suggests, that hormones, ions and cytoplasmic factors play a fundamental and variable role in the differentiation and function of “fully” mature oocytes of many species including mammals. Significantly, the data suggest that a “fully” mature oocyte occurs as a result of the expression of an underlying developmental program. Variations in these substances or the processes involved in their formation or actions appear to be relevant to understanding a wide variety of developmental abnormalities as well as to assessing the normality or abnormality of in vivo or in vitro maturation and differentiation. This content is only available as a PDF. Author notes 2 Department of Population Dynamics. 1979 by American Society of Animal Science
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    REQUIREMENTS FOR BLASTOCYST DEVELOPMENT IN VITRO

    BRINSTER, R., L.;TROIKE, D., E.

    1979 Journal of Animal Science

    doi: 10.1093/ansci/49.Supplement_II.26pmid: 45481

    Summary FOUR characteristics of culture medium that are important to embryo development and nutrition of the blastocyst have been discussed. An examination of several of the most commonly used media for embryo culture demonstrates many similarities among them. The milliosmolarities of the media range from the hypoosmotic optimums (256 milliosmols) demonstrated in several in vitro studies to the physiologic range (308 to 315 milliosmols). Media between these extremes generally allow good development. Low oxygen concentrations (5%) in the culture environment allow somewhat better development of early cleavage stages, but recent studies suggest the difference between development in 5 and 20% oxygen to be less than originally thought. The media most commonly employed for early embryo culture contain bicarbonate as the buffer, but maintenance of pH is probably not the most crucial role of the CO2-bicarbonate content of the media. Likewise, since 1965 almost all media used to culture embryos have used pyruvate as the primary energy source. This is particularly important when early stages, before blastocyst development, are cultured. The concentration used generally falls within the optimum range of 2.5 to 5.0 × 10−4 M first reported. Although glucose is not oxidized well by the early cleavage stages, it is an important energy source for all blastocysts. Furthermore, glucose contributes more than any other carbon source, including amino acids, to protein formation. Much is yet to be learned concerning the nutrition of the blastocyst, but our knowledge has increased immensely during the last 15 years. Hopefully our progress will be at least as rapid in the coming decade. This content is only available as a PDF. Author notes 1 Financial support for the authors’ research has been from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 12384, HD 08539), The National Cancer Institute (CA 14676) and the Population Council. D. E. Troike was a trainee on NICHHD grant HD 00239. 2 We thank Eleanor Lang for assistance in preparation of this manuscript. 4 Laboratory of Reproductive Physiology. 1979 by American Society of Animal Science
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    ACTIONS OF HORMONES ON THE UTERUS AND EFFECT ON CONCEPTUS DEVELOPMENT

    BAZER, FULLER, W.;ROBERTS, R., MICHAEL;THATCHER, WILLIAM, W.

    1979 Journal of Animal Science

    doi: 10.1093/ansci/49.Supplement_II.35pmid: 400776

    Summary THE process of reproduction in the mammalian female involves interactions between gonadal and placental steroids and, possibly, protein hormones such as placental lactogen, and the uterine endometrium. These interactions are discussed relative to available data from pigs and with the understanding that the concepts presented may not be directly applicable to other species. Swine embryos enter the uterus for continued development beyond the early blastocyst stage and, within the uterus, the spherical blastocyst, of about 2 mm diameter on day 12, undergoes rapid elongation to an organism of about 1 m in length by day 15 of pregnancy. During this period of elongation, the blastocyst appears to provide the chemical signal, presumably unconjugated estrogens, that allows for corpora lutea (CL) maintenance (luteostatic effect) and, therefore, continued production of progesterone by the CL which is essential for pregnancy. Estrogens from the blastocyst may exert their luteostatic effect on the uterus by causing prostaglandin F2α, the presumed porcine uterine luteolysin, to be secreted in an exocrine (toward the uterine lumen) rather than an endocrine (toward the endometrial stroma and vasculature) direction during pregnancy. Consequently, prostaglandin F2α is sequestered in the uterine lumen and does not become available, via the utero-ovarian vasculature, to exert its luteolytic effect. The potential steroid precursor(s) available to the trophoblast for estrogen synthesis appear to be produced through endometrial conversion of progesterone to unconjugated androgens, e.g., androstenedione and testosterone, and conjugated estrogens, e.g., estrone-sulfate and estradiol-sulfate. The estrogens may, in concert with progesterone and possibly other hormones, placental lactogen for example, act locally, i.e., at the site of placentation to: (1) result in a luteostatic effect; (2) increase uterine blood flow; (3) enhance water, electrolyte and substrate (carbohydrate and amino acid) transport to the site of placentation and across the placenta; (4) affect synthesis and secretion of macro-molecules (histotroph) by the uterine glands that serve as enzymes and (or) carrier molecules and (5) control or modulate physiological and (or) biochemical events essential to placental and fetal development that are not understood. This content is only available as a PDF. Author notes 2 Department of Animal Science. 3 Department of Biochemistry. 4 Department of Dairy Science. 1979 by American Society of Animal Science
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    MECHANISM OF ACTION OF ESTROGEN AGONISTS AND ANTAGONISTS

    CLARK, J., H.;HARDIN, J., W.;McCORMACK, S., A.

    1979 Journal of Animal Science

    doi: 10.1093/ansci/49.Supplement_II.46pmid: 400777

    Summary THE relationship between estrogen agonists and antagonists and the nuclear binding of the estrogen receptor was investigated in the immature rat uterus. Estriol (and other short acting estrogens) are antagonistic when administered as a single injection due to the inability of the receptor-estriol complex to be retained by uterine nuclei for a critical period necessary to stimulate true uterine growth. This failure of the receptor-estriol complex to be retained appears to be due to rapid clearance of estriol from uterine tissue following a single injection of the hormone. When estriol is present in a chronic fashion, it acts as an agonist because receptor estriol complex is retained at nuclear sites for long periods of time. Nonsteroid estrogen antagonists, such as Nafoxidine, also cause long term nuclear retention of the estrogen receptor and act as estrogen agonists after a single injection. However, after multiple injections these drugs are antagonistic and this effect is correlated with decrease availability of cytoplasmic estrogen receptors. In addition, these compounds appear to specifically stimulate the growth of uterine epithelial cells while minimally affecting other cell types which results in hyperestrogenization of the epithelium. This content is only available as a PDF. Author notes 1 Department of Cell Biology. 1979 by American Society of Animal Science
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    GENETIC VARIATION IN PRENATAL SURVIVAL AND LITTER SIZE

    BRADFORD, G., E.

    1979 Journal of Animal Science

    doi: 10.1093/ansci/49.Supplement_II.66pmid: 400778

    Summary THE nature of genetic variation in litter size and its components was examined using results of long term selection and of crossing selected lines of mice. Selection for small and for large litters produced strains with mean litter size of approximately 6 and 15, respectively. The large litter size line showed a period of renewed response after 45 generations of selection, following a period of 15 generations with no response. The relative contribution of genotype of the dam and of the embryo to prenatal survival was examined using results of selection, crossing and embryo transfer. Genotype of female carrying the litter was responsible for most of the observed differences. Genes for poor survival expressed by the embryo were present in some strains, but accounted for less variation than did maternal genotype. Information from the selected lines and from crosses among them provided evidence for dominance of genes affecting fertility and prenatal survival and additivity of genes affecting ovulation rate and body weight. The information was used to suggest a model for more effective exploitation of heterosis using breeds or strains of animals of known performance for different components. The extent of genetic variation for prenatal survival suggests that natural selection in this species may not always be for maximum survival. It is suggested that the ability to reduce litter size after conception, in response to nutritional or other stress, may at times be of selective advantage, contributing to maintenance of genetic variation in survival rate. This content is only available as a PDF. Author notes 1 The author expresses his sincere appreciation to Gary Anderson, Terry Moler, Roberto Neira, Sandra Soga and Jimmy Spearow for their contributions to the results included in this paper. The animal colony was under the able supervision of Oskar Lang. 3 Department of Animal Science. 1979 by American Society of Animal Science

    Showing 1 to 5 of 5 Articles

    Articles per page
    Browse All Journals

    Related Journals:

    World's Poultry Science JournalAnimal Health Research ReviewsPrimatesZoological StudiesInvertebrate BiologyCurrent ZoologyItalian Journal of Animal ScienceEuropean Zoological JournalNew Zealand Journal of ZoologyAfrican Zoology