Clarifying the Content of Intellectual Humility: A Systematic Review and Integrative FrameworkPorter, Tenelle; Baldwin, Chayce R.; Warren, Michael T.; Murray, Elise D.; Cotton Bronk, Kendall; Forgeard, Marie J.C; Snow, Nancy E.; Jayawickreme, Eranda
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1975725pmid: 34569872
Abstract During the last decade, intellectual humility has gone from a topic of philosophical inquiry to one of serious scientific investigation. It has been variously described as a remedy for political polarization, a tool for advancing scientific credibility, and a disposition that promotes learning. However, less attention has been paid to how intellectual humility has been defined and measured or how well psychologists’ definitions and measures align with one another or with philosophers’ accounts. Through a systematic review of empirical intellectual humility research, we identified 18 separate definitions and 20 measures including16 unique questionnaires. We then synthesized this research to advance a new framework of intellectual humility. Implications of this framework for measurement and future research on intellectual humility are discussed.
Dimensionality, Item Response Theory, Effect Size Attenuation, and Test Bias Analyses of the Self-Importance of Moral Identity Scale (SIMIS)Lutz, Paul K.; O’Connor, Brian P.; Folk, Dunigan
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1991359pmid: 34704515
Abstract The extent to which morality and being a moral person are important to one’s identity is most commonly assessed using Aquino and Reed’s (2002) Self-Importance of Moral Identity Scale (SIMIS). This study provided detailed psychometric examinations of the structure and discrimination levels of the SIMIS in a large (N = 2108) and heterogeneous sample. Results indicated that the SIMIS is clearly 2-dimensional, as expected. The Internalization and Symbolization subscales provided sufficient, and sometimes high levels of test information across the latent trait continuums. There were no redundant items and no bias based on gender. The most notable, albeit minor, shortcomings were that there are too many response options and that test information (discrimination power) was diminished at high levels of the Internalization latent trait continuum, apparently due to skewness. The fluctuating levels of measurement precision resulted in slightly greater attenuations in effect sizes for Internalization than for Symbolization across data for 31 other measures. The present findings from a large dataset and a variety of modern, revealing statistical methods provided relatively consistent, favorable findings for the measure.
Norwegian Clinicians’ Experiences of Learnability and Usability of SCID-II, SCID-5-PD and SCID-5-AMPD-I Interviews: A Sequential Multi-Group Qualitative ApproachHeltne, Aleksander; Bode, Christina; Hummelen, Benjamin; Falkum, Erik; Selvik, Sara Germans; Paap, Muirne C. S.
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1975726pmid: 34546142
Abstract The DSM-5 presents two competing diagnostic frameworks for personality disorders: the standard categorical model and the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD). The AMPD was initially criticized for being too complex and theory laden for clinical implementation. Though inter-rater reliability studies have contested initial claims of the model’s complexity, little attention has been paid to how clinicians experience the usability and learnability of either model. We interviewed twenty Norwegian clinicians about their experiences with either the SCID-II/5-PD (n = 9), SCID-5-AMPD-I (n = 8), or both (n = 3). Separate thematic analyses were conducted for SCID-II/5-PD and SCID-5-AMPD-I groups, and group themes were compared. We identified four themes for each group, relating to required skills, training, challenges and information gained through the interview. We found that training and clinical experience were considered to be important for both interviews. Moreover, the SCID-5-AMPD-I was considered to rely more explicitly on theory specific to the development and content of the AMPD model in general and the LPFS specifically We also identified shared and unique challenges and shortcomings of each interview. We comment on how our findings relate to the debate surrounding the AMPD, and recommend development of clear training guidelines for both interviews.
A Critical Evaluation of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ)Müller, Sascha; Wendt, Leon P.; Spitzer, Carsten; Masuhr, Oliver; Back, Sarah N.; Zimmermann, Johannes
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1981346pmid: 34597256
Abstract The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ) is an 8-item self-report measure of reflective functioning that is presumed to capture individual differences in hypo- and hypermentalizing. Despite its broad acceptance by the field, we argue that the validity of the measure is not well-established. The current research elaborates on problems of the RFQ related to its item content, scoring procedure, dimensionality, and associations with psychopathology. We tested these considerations across three large clinical and non-clinical samples from Germany and the US (total N = 2289). In a first study, we found that the RFQ may assess a single latent dimension related to hypomentalizing but is rather unlikely to capture maladaptive forms of hypermentalizing. Moreover, the RFQ exhibited very strong associations with measures of personality pathology, while associations with measures of symptom distress were less strong. In a second preregistered study focused on convergent and discriminant validity, however, a commonality analysis indicated that associations with indicators of personality pathology are inflated because some of the RFQ items tap into emotional lability and impulsivity rather than mentalizing. Our findings demonstrate limitations of the RFQ. We discuss key challenges in assessing mentalizing via self-report.
Psychometric Properties of the Italian Mentalization Questionnaire: Assessing Structural Invariance and Construct ValidityRaimondi, Giulia; Samela, Tonia; Lester, David; Imperatori, Claudio; Carlucci, Leonardo; Contardi, Anna; Balsamo, Michela; Innamorati, Marco
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1991362pmid: 34694942
Abstract Mentalization is an important interpersonal ability, necessary for adaptive interpersonal relationships and emotion regulation. Deficits in mentalization have been associated with poor psychological outcomes and have been observed in patients with Borderline Personality Disorder. The Mentalization Questionnaire (MZQ) has been developed as self-report measure of mentalization deficit. The aim of the study was to investigate the dimensionality of the MZQ in a nonclinical sample composed of Italian adults from the general population and to analyze its performance in categorizing individuals with higher risk of borderline symptoms. A non-clinical sample of 1,015 adults (709 women and 306 men) was administered the Italian versions of the MZQ, the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ), and a measure of borderline psychopathology. A revised single-factor solution fitted the data well and demonstrated metric invariance across gender. The internal consistency (Ordinal α = 0.87) and stability (r = 0.84) were satisfactory. The MZQ was moderately associated with the RFQ dimensions. The ROC curve analysis showed that the MZQ was able to discriminate satisfactorily people with higher risk for borderline symptomatology from those with lower risk. The MZQ may, therefore, be considered a reliable and valid measure of mentalization for categorizing people at higher risk for borderline pathology.
Psychometric Evaluation of the Action Control Scale in Turkish Samples and the Relationship of Action–State Orientation with Emotional LaborPeker, Mehmet; Meşe, Gülgün
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1981344pmid: 34605745
Abstract The Action Control Scale (ACS-90) measures action–state orientation (ASO), which describes individual differences in volitional processes such as goal initiation and maintenance. In this study, we examine psychometric properties of a Turkish translation of the ACS-90 (ACS-T). Moreover, we extend past research by investigating the relationship between ASO and emotional labor measured as a trait and a state construct. We conducted four studies to address our aims. Study 1 (N = 569) shows that the revised 23-item ACS-T with three factors (preoccupation, hesitation, and volatility) provides a good fit to the data and displays acceptable reliability. Study 2 (N = 377) confirms the factor structure of the 23-item ACS-T and provides evidence for construct validity. Study 3 (N = 159) shows that the hesitation subscale negatively predicts trait surface acting. Study 4 (N = 74, daily responses = 231) indicates that the preoccupation and hesitation subscales negatively predict state surface acting. Altogether, the results show that the 23-item three-factor ACS-T displays good psychometric qualities in Turkish samples and that ASO is relevant to emotional labor research.
Moving Toward, Moving Against, and Moving Away: An Interpersonal Approach to Construct Validation of the Horney–Coolidge Type InventoryCarlson, Steven E.; Smith, Timothy W.; Parkhurst, Kimberly A.; Tinajero, Ruben; Grove, Jeremy L.; Goans, Christian; Hirai, Michiyo; Ruiz, John M.
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1991358pmid: 34748442
Abstract Karen Horney’s interpersonal theory of adjustment defined three different neurotic trends involving characteristic social behavior and motives: compliant (moving toward people), aggressive (moving against people), and detached (moving away from people). The Horney–Coolidge Type Inventory (HCTI) was developed to assess these trends, but has not been validated using standard methods in the interpersonal perspective. The studies reported here refined the structure of the HCTI, and utilized the structural summary method (SSM) to identify relationships of the three shortened HCTI trend scales with the interpersonal circumplex (IPC) in single university (n = 514) and multisite university (n = 3,283) samples. Results across both studies confirmed predicted interpersonal characteristics of each trend: Compliance was associated with warm submissiveness, aggression was associated with hostile dominance, and detachment was associated with hostile or cold submissiveness. However, analyses of facets within the three HCTI trend domains revealed significant differences. Results are discussed as a potential guide to further refinement of assessments of the Horney maladaptive trends, and support inclusion of Horney’s model in current interpersonal theory.
Measuring the Dark Core of Personality in German: Psychometric Properties, Measurement Invariance, Predictive Validity, and Self-Other AgreementBader, Martina; Horsten, Luisa K.; Hilbig, Benjamin E.; Zettler, Ingo; Moshagen, Morten
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1984931pmid: 34643456
Abstract The Dark Factor of Personality (D)—the underlying disposition of aversive traits—has been shown to account for various ethically and socially aversive behaviors. Whereas previous findings support the reliability and validity of the original English item sets suggested to measure D, a thorough psychometric examination of their German translation is still pending. Using data from four different samples (total N > 33,000), this study comprehensively evaluates the German version of the D70, D35, and D16 with respect to (a) their factor structure, (b) measurement invariance across gender, (c) measurement equivalence with the original English item sets, (d) predictive validity for relevant outcomes across a six-month period, and (e) self-observer agreement. Results confirm the bifactor structure of the D70 and single-factor models for the D35 and the D16. Measurement invariance testing shows partial strict invariance across gender and language versions. Furthermore, predictive validity and a moderate degree of self-other agreement are supported. The German version of the D70 and its shorter versions thus allow for a psychometrically sound assessment of D.
Measurement of Eating Pathology Using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3)Marek, Ryan J.; Anderson, Jaime L.
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1991361pmid: 34678090
Abstract Eating disorders are prevalent among college student populations. Although previous iterations of the instrument did not include specific measurement of eating pathology, the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-3 (MMPI-3) now includes a specific scale (i.e., Eating Concerns [EAT]) to assess problematic eating behaviors. The current study examined the MMPI-3 assessment of eating pathology among 249 undergraduate women. A pattern emerged where symptoms of internalizing psychopathology on the MMPI-3 were generally associated with symptoms of eating disorder. However, the newly included EAT scale demonstrated the strongest associations with most areas of eating dysfunction. Further, hierarchical regression analyses suggested that the EAT scale added substantial incremental predictive utility (up to 23%) over other MMPI-3 scales combined in assessing eating pathology. Classification accuracy statistics yielded high sensitivity and specificity coefficients when predicting eating disorder risk at an EAT scale score cutoff of 75 T or higher. These findings support the use of the MMPI-3 in assessing eating pathology in college women, although its performance with men and with women not of college age remains to be studied.
The Two-Factor Perfectionism Model and Heavy Work Investment in Italy and the U.S.Spagnoli, Paola; Rice, Kenneth; Scafuri Kovalchuk, Liliya; Rice, Fredrick; Molinaro, Danila; Carpentieri, Salvatore
doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1975724pmid: 34533435
Abstract Research is needed to understand the effects that perfectionism may have in the occupational sector and whether its implications vary cross-nationally. In the current study the relationship of perfectionism on workaholism and work engagement was assessed through multiple groups structural equations models to compare strengths of association in the two countries after measurement invariance was examined for the measures in a sample of 804 U.S. and Italian participants. Evidence of similarities but also some differences were found between the countries. In particular, perfectionistic strivings was similarly related to workaholism in both the countries, whereas it was more strongly related to work engagement in Italy than in U.S. A statistically significant difference for work engagement (Italians more engaged that Americans) was also found, whereas no differences were found for workaholism. Cross-sectional nature of the study and culture used as a proxy is the main limitations. However, the cross-cultural approach adopted in the current study allowed us to report that evidence provided in a country might not be directly applied to another country, even if cultures are quite similar.