Some algebraic surfaces with canonical map of degree 10, 12, 14Nguyen, Bin
doi: 10.1080/00927872.2023.2232869pmid: N/A
Abstract Surfaces of general type with canonical map of degree d bigger than 8 have bounded geometric genus and irregularity. In particular the irregularity is at most 2 if d ≥ 10 . In the present paper, the existence of surfaces with d = 10 and all possible irregularities, surfaces with d = 12 and irregularity 1 and 2, and surfaces with d = 14 and irregularity 0 and 1 is proven, by constructing these surfaces as Z 2 3 -covers of certain rational surfaces. These results together with the construction by C. Rito of a surface with d = 12 and irregularity 0 show that all the possibilities for the irregularity in the cases d = 10, d = 12 can occur, whilst the existence of a surface with d = 14 and irregularity 2 is still an open problem.
Generalized skew-derivations acting on multilinear polynomial in prime ringsGupta, Pallavee; De Filippis, Vincenzo; Tiwari, S. K.
doi: 10.1080/00927872.2023.2233019pmid: N/A
Abstract Let R be a noncommutative prime ring of characteristic different from 2, Q r be the right Martindale quotient ring of R and C = Z ( Q r ) be the extended centroid of R . Suppose that π ( x 1 , … , x n ) is a noncentral multilinear polynomial over C , S = { π ( r 1 , … , r n ) | r 1 , … , r n ∈ R } , F , G and H are three generalized skew-derivations of R associated to the same automorphism α. Let h , f , g be the associated skew derivations respectively of H , F and G , such that h, f, g are commuting with α. We will provide the complete description of H , F and G , in the case F ( X ) G ( X ) = H ( X 2 ) , for all X ∈ S .
Normal nearness subgroupsÖztürk, Mehmet Ali; Tekin, Özlem; Jun, Young Bae
doi: 10.1080/00927872.2023.2234037pmid: N/A
Abstract In 2022, Öztürk defined the nearness equivalence classes and nearness cosets of the nearness groups (see [10]). Furthermore, he showed a nearness group G induced by a nearness subgroup H can not be written two different decompositions of G by separate left (right) cosets [10]. In other words, if H is a nearness subgroup of a nearness group G, then G may be shown as a union of different non-discrete left (right) cosets of H in G. Also, it is given that Lagrange’s theorem does not work in the nearness subgroups as usual subgroups. Our purpose in this paper is to introduce normal nearness subgroups and quotient nearness groups. Besides which, it is given an example of a nearness group that has nearness subgroup but not normal nearness subgroup. Also, a criterion that satisfies the condition of being a normal subgroup is investigated. It is shown that the multiplication of the two right near-cosets (left near-cosets) is again a right near-coset (left near-coset) is valid in normal nearness subgroups under certain conditions. Moreover, examples of normal nearness subgroups and quotient nearness groups are given.
On radicals of Novikov algebrasPanasenko, Alexander Sergeevich
doi: 10.1080/00927872.2023.2235420pmid: N/A
Abstract We show that in a prime nonassociative Novikov algebra every nonzero ideal is non-associative. We prove that Baer (and Andrunakievich) radical and the largest left quasiregular ideal coincide in finite dimensional Novikov algebras over a field of characteristic 0 or algebraically closed field of odd characteristic. We show non-existence of right quasiregular radical in finite dimensional Novikov algebras.