Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2026 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

This site is protected by VikingCloud's Trusted Commerce program
      Home

    Immunogenetics

    Subject:
    Genetics
    Publisher:
    Springer-Verlag — Springer Journals
    ISSN:
    0093-7711
    Scimago Journal Rank:
    95

    2026

    Volume 78
    Issue 1 (Jul)

    2025

    Volume 78
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 77
    Issue 1 (Dec)

    2024

    Volume 77
    Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 76
    Issue 5-6 (Dec)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2023

    Volume 75
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2022

    Volume 74
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2021

    Volume 73
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2020

    Volume 73
    Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 72
    Issue 9-10 (Nov)Issue 8 (Oct)Issue 6-7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 1-2 (Feb)

    2019

    Volume OnlineFirst
    December
    Volume 71
    Issue 10 (Nov)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Sep)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2018

    Volume 71
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 70
    Issue 10 (Jul)Issue 9 (Jun)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (Mar)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2017

    Volume 70
    Issue 7 (Dec)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 69
    Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8-9 (Aug)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Jan)

    2016

    Volume 69
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 68
    Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jun)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jan)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)

    2015

    Volume 68
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 67
    Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (May)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Jan)

    2014

    Volume 67
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 66
    Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Jun)Issue 9 (Oct)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 53
    Issue 9 (Feb)

    2013

    Volume 66
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 65
    Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 2 (Feb)

    2012

    Volume 65
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 64
    Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Jul)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Feb)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Feb)

    2011

    Volume 64
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 63
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Jun)Issue 10 (Jun)Issue 9 (Jun)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (Mar)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)

    2010

    Volume 63
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 62
    Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 61
    Issue 12 (Jan)

    2009

    Volume 62
    Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 61
    Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)

    2008

    Volume 61
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 60
    Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2007

    Volume 60
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 59
    Issue 12 (Nov)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)
    Volume 44
    Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Apr)

    2006

    Volume 59
    Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 58
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Oct)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)
    Volume 57
    Issue 12 (Jan)
    Volume 43
    Issue 5 (Jun)
    Volume 30
    Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 29
    Issue 1 (Feb)

    2005

    Volume 57
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Dec)Issue 10 (Nov)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 56
    Issue 12 (Jan)Issue 11 (Feb)Issue 10 (Jan)
    Volume 43
    Issue 6 (Sep)
    Volume 40
    Issue 5 (Feb)
    Volume 34
    Issue 6 (May)
    Volume 33
    Issue 3 (May)
    Volume 32
    Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 31
    Issue 6 (Aug)
    Volume 12
    Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 11
    Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 10
    Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Apr)
    Volume 9
    Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 8
    Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 7
    Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 6
    Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 5
    Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 4
    Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 3
    Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 2
    Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 1
    Issue 1 (Apr)

    2004

    Volume 56
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Dec)Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Oct)Issue 7 (Sep)Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 55
    Issue 12 (Feb)Issue 11 (Jan)Issue 10 (Jan)
    Volume 43
    Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)
    Volume 42
    Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 41
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 40
    Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 39
    Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 38
    Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 37
    Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 36
    Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 35
    Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 34
    Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 33
    Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 32
    Issue 6 (Jul)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jul)
    Volume 31
    Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 29
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)
    Volume 28
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 27
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 26
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)
    Volume 25
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 24
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 23
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 22
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 21
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 20
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 19
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 18
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 17
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 16
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 15
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 14
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 2 (Sep)
    Volume 13
    Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Oct)

    2003

    Volume 55
    Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Nov)Issue 8 (Oct)Issue 7 (Aug)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 54
    Issue 12 (Feb)Issue 11 (Feb)Issue 10 (Jan)

    2002

    Volume 54
    Issue 10 (Dec)Issue 9 (Dec)Issue 8 (Nov)Issue 7 (Oct)Issue 6 (Sep)Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (May)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 53
    Issue 12 (Feb)Issue 11 (Feb)Issue 10 (Feb)

    2001

    Volume 53
    Issue 9 (Dec)Issue 8 (Oct)Issue 7 (Sep)Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Feb)
    Volume 52
    Issue 4 (Jan)

    2000

    Volume 52
    Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 51
    Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1999

    Volume 50
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 49
    Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 11-12 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7-8 (Jun)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1998

    Volume 48
    Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 47
    Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)

    1997

    Volume 47
    Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 46
    Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (May)
    Volume 45
    Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)

    1996

    Volume 45
    Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 44
    Issue 6 (Oct)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Apr)
    Volume 43
    Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Mar)

    1995

    Volume 42
    Issue 5 (Sep)
    Volume 41
    Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)

    1994

    Volume 39
    Issue 2 (Jan)

    1993

    Volume 38
    Issue 4 (Jun)

    1992

    Volume 36
    Issue 5 (Aug)
    Volume 35
    Issue 3 (Feb)

    1990

    Volume 32
    Issue 1 (Jan)

    1989

    Volume 30
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 29
    Issue 3 (Mar)

    1987

    Volume 26
    Issue 4-5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jul)

    1986

    Volume 24
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 23
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1985

    Volume 22
    Issue 6 (Dec)
    Volume 21
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)

    1984

    Volume 20
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 19
    Issue 5 (May)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1983

    Volume 18
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (May)
    Volume 17
    Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1982

    Volume 16
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)
    Volume 15
    Issue 1 (Jan)

    1981

    Volume 14
    Issue 3-4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)
    Volume 13
    Issue 6 (Aug)Issue 3 (May)
    Volume 12
    Issue 1 (Dec)

    1980

    Volume 11
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 10
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 1-4 (Feb)

    1979

    Volume 9
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 8
    Issue 1 (Dec)

    1978

    Volume 7
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 6
    Issue 1 (Dec)

    1977

    Volume 5
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 4
    Issue 1 (Dec)

    1976

    Volume 3
    Issue 1 (Dec)

    1975

    Volume 2
    Issue 1 (Dec)

    1974

    Volume 1
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    In Memoriam John Guardiola (1947–2004)

    Del Pozzo, Giovanna; Maffei, Antonella

    2005 Immunogenetics

    doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0762-2pmid: N/A

    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    HLA polymorphisms are associated with Helicobacter pylori infected gastric cancer in a high risk population, China

    Li, Zhaohui; Chen, Dafang; Zhang, Chunfeng; Li, Yong; Cao, Bangwei; Ning, Tao; Zhao, Yiming; You, Weicheng; Ke, Yang

    2005 Immunogenetics

    doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0723-9pmid: 15650879

    Helicobacter pylori is one of the most common bacterial infections associated with an increased risk of gastric cancer, but its association with host factors, particularly polymorphisms of the immune response genes, such as human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, is still unclear. To investigate the role of HLA polymorphisms in the risk of gastric cancer among subjects with H. pylori infection, a case-control study involving 52 gastric cancer patients and 139 non-cancer controls was conducted in Linqu County, China, an area with a high incidence of gastric cancer. Polymorphisms of HLA class I and class II alleles were determined by PCR with sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP). The information about H. pylori infection was obtained from previous records. Among 48 class I and 19 class II HLA alleles detected in this study, two alleles, CW*03 and DRB1*01, were found to be distributed significantly differently between patients and controls [odds ratio(OR)=1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.13–3.35, P=0.017 and OR=4.39, 95% CI=1.39–13.84, P=0.012, respectively). The OR of gastric cancer risk in individuals carrying CW*03/CW*03 or CW*03/CW*N was 2.06, 95% CI=1.05–4.02, P=0.035, while the OR was 3.49, 95% CI=1.0–12.4, P=0.04 for DRB1*01/DRB1*01 or DRB1*01/DRB1*N carriers. The analysis of the interaction between H. pylori infection and HLA risk genotypes of CW*03 or DRB1*01 revealed that the effect of CW*03 and DRB1*01 genotypes on gastric cancer risk was manifested stronger in H. pylori-positive individuals (OR=5.30, 95% CI=1.73–16.29, P=0.004 and OR=13.38, 95% CI=2.52–70.98, P=0.002, respectively) than in H. pylori-negative ones (OR=1.25, 95% CI=0.25–6.12, P=0.785 and OR=2.26, 95% CI=0.18–28.88, P=0.531, respectively). The combined effect of the two risk HLA genotypes on gastric cancer risk was also analysed. The result showed that the individuals carrying both the CW*03 and DRB1*01 alleles could only be found in cancer patients (5/52), and not in controls (0/139), further suggesting that CW*03 and DRB1*01 are risk alleles advancing the progression of tumorigenesis. These observations demonstrate that host HLA genotypes may play an important role in the risk of gastric cancer, especially among persons with H. pylori infection.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Evolutionary conservation and characterization of the bare lymphocyte syndrome transcription factor RFX-B and its paralogue ANKRA2

    Long, Alyssa; Boss, Jeremy

    2005 Immunogenetics

    doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0738-2pmid: 15655668

    The extraordinary homology between major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) proteins across species from human to bony fish suggests that transcription factors that regulate these proteins might be conserved as well. Deficiencies in four proteins that regulate MHC II genes in humans (RFX-B, RFX5, RFXAP, and CIITA) cause an inherited immunodeficiency disorder known as the bare lymphocyte syndrome (BLS). To understand the structure and mechanism of function of the BLS transcription factors, we analyzed the evolutionary history of RFX-B, the factor deficient in the majority of patients with BLS. Sequence comparison and analysis of the RFX-B proteins showed that RFX-B and a closely related protein, ANKRA2, are present in humans to bony fish and that specific domains are highly conserved. In addition to sequence conservation, functional conservation exists, as mouse and Xenopus RFX-B orthologues, but not the paralogous protein ANKRA2, were able to complement the MHC II deficiency in a BLS-patient-derived cell line deficient in RFX-B. The remarkable conservation of the RFX-B lineage attests to the conservation of the regulation mechanism for this gene system and its importance to precisely regulate MHC class II molecules in both the developing and active immune response.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    HLA class II alleles and measles virus-specific cytokine immune response following two doses of measles vaccine

    Ovsyannikova, Inna; Jacobson, Robert; Ryan, Jenna; Vierkant, Robert; Pankratz, V.; Jacobsen, Steven; Poland, Gregory

    2005 Immunogenetics

    doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0756-0pmid: 15712014

    Measles virus-specific T cells and the production of cytokines play a critical role in the immune response following measles immunization. To understand the genetic factors that influence variation in IFN-γ and IL-4 responses following measles immunization and to provide insight into the factors influencing both cellular and humoral immunity to measles, we assessed associations between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II genes and measles-specific Th1 and Th2-type cytokine responses in peripheral blood lymphocytes from 339 children previously vaccinated with two doses of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR-II). Median values for measles-specific IFN-γ and IL-4 secretion levels were 40.73 and 9.71 pg/ml, respectively. The global tests suggested associations between measles-specific IFN-γ response and alleles of the DRB1 and DQB1 loci (P=0.07 and P=0.02, respectively). Specifically, DRB1*0301, *0901, and *1501 alleles were significantly associated with IFN-γ secretion. The alleles that suggested evidence of an HLA association with IL-4 secretion were DRB1*0103, *0701, and *1101. Th1 cytokine responses and DQB1 allele associations revealed that the alleles with the strongest association with IFN-γ secretion were DQB1*0201, *0303, *0402, and *0602. Specific alleles with a suggestive association with low measles-specific Th2 cytokine responses were DQB1*0202 and *0503. In addition, DPB1*0101, *0201, and *0601 alleles provided suggestive evidence of an HLA association with measles-induced IFN-γ response, while DPB1*0501 was associated with an IL-4 response. These data suggest that IFN-γ and IL-4 cytokine responses to measles may be genetically restricted in part by HLA class II genes, which in turn can restrict the cellular immune response to measles vaccine.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Effects of common atopy-associated amino acid substitutions in the IL-4 receptor alpha chain on IL-4 induced phenotypes

    Franjkovic, Izolda; Gessner, Andre; König, Inke; Kissel, Karin; Bohnert, Anette; Hartung, Anne; Ohly, Astrid; Ziegler, Andreas; Hackstein, Holger; Bein, Gregor

    2005 Immunogenetics

    doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0763-1pmid: 15712015

    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    MHC class I genes in the owl monkey: mosaic organisation, convergence and loci diversity

    Cardenas, Paula P.; Suarez, Carlos F.; Martinez, Pilar; Patarroyo, Manuel E.; Patarroyo, Manuel A.

    2005 Immunogenetics

    doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0751-5pmid: 15654599

    The MHC class I molecule plays an important role in immune response, pathogen recognition and response against vaccines and self- versus non-self-recognition. Studying MHC class I characteristics thus became a priority when dealing with Aotus to ensure its use as an animal model for biomedical research. Isolation, cloning and sequencing of exons 1–8 from 27 MHC class I alleles obtained from 13 individuals classified as belonging to three owl monkey species (A. nancymaae, A. nigriceps and A. vociferans) were carried out to establish similarities between Aotus MHC class I genes and those expressed by other New and Old World primates. Six Aotus MHC class I sequence groups (Ao-g1, Ao-g2, Ao-g3, Ao-g4, Ao-g5 and Ao-g6) weakly related to non-classical Catarrhini MHC were identified. An allelic lineage was also identified in one A. nancymaae and two A. vociferans monkeys, exhibiting a high degree of conservation, negative selection along the molecule and premature termination of the open reading frame at exon 5 (Ao-g5). These sequences’ high conservation suggests that they more likely correspond to a soluble form of Aotus MHC class I molecules than to a new group of processed pseudogenes. Another group, named Ao-g6, exhibited a strong relationship with Catarrhini’s classical MHC-B-C loci. Sequence evolution and variability analysis indicated that Aotus MHC class I molecules experience inter-locus gene conversion phenomena, contributing towards their high variability.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Molecular cloning of KLRI1 and KLRI2, a novel pair of lectin-like natural killer-cell receptors with opposing signalling motifs

    Saether, Per; Westgaard, Ingunn; Flornes, Line; Hoelsbrekken, Sigurd; Ryan, James; Fossum, Sigbjørn; Dissen, Erik

    2005 Immunogenetics

    doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0759-xpmid: 15650876

    We here report the molecular cloning of a novel family of killer-cell lectin-like (KLR) receptors in the rat and the mouse, termed KLRI. In both species, there are two members, KLRI1 and KLRI2. While the extracellular lectin-like domains of KLRI1 and KLRI2 are similar [74% (rat) and 83% (mouse) amino acid identity], they differ intracellularly. KLRI1 has two immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motifs (ITIMs) in the cytoplasmic domain, suggesting an inhibitory function. KLRI2 has no ITIM, but a positively charged lysine residue in the transmembrane region, suggesting association with activating adapter molecules. Klri1 and Klri2 are localized within the natural killer (NK) cell gene complex on rat chromosome 4 and mouse chromosome 6. By RT-PCR and Northern blot analysis KLRI1 and KLRI2 were selectively expressed by NK cells in both rat and mouse. Epitope-tagged expression constructs of rat KLRI1 and rat KLRI2 induced surface expression of a nondisulphide-linked protein of M r 36,000/39,000 and M r 34,000, respectively.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    The mutation spectrum of purified AID is similar to the mutability index in Ramos cells and in ung −/− msh2 −/− mice

    Larijani, Mani; Frieder, Darina; Basit, Wajiha; Martin, Alberto

    2005 Immunogenetics

    doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0748-0pmid: 15650878

    Somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination are initiated by the enzyme activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID). Although other models exist for AID function, one model suggests that AID initiates these processes by deaminating cytidines within DNA, thereby initiating mutagenic repair pathways that involve either UNG or Msh2. Recent work shows that GST-hAID prefers to mutate WRC motifs, a motif frequently mutated in vivo. Because this is a strong argument in favor of the DNA deamination model, we sought to extend this analysis by examining the activity of purified AID with a small polyhistidine tag (His-hAID) on all 16 trinucleotide combinations (i.e., NNC). Here we show that purified His-hAID preferentially mutated cytidines within WRC (i.e., A/T, A/G, C) motifs, but poorly mutated cytidines within GYC (G, C/T, C) motifs. We next compared this mutability preference with those in hypermutating Ramos cells and in msh2 −/− ung −/− mice, since both are reduced or deficient in UNG- and/or Msh2-induced mutations and are thus likely to reflect the sequence specificity of the mutator in vivo. Indeed, the mutation spectrums of purified His-hAID and GST-hAID matched the trinucleotide mutability indexes in Ramos cells and in msh2 −/− ung −/− mice. Thus, the activity of AID on single-stranded DNA produces the same mutation pattern as double-stranded DNA in hypermutating cells. These data lend support to the DNA deamination model and indicate that AID does not require co-factors for its WRC specificity.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    An immunogenetic basis for the high prevalence of urogenital cancer in a free-ranging population of California sea lions (Zalophus californianus)

    Bowen, Lizabeth; Aldridge, Brian; DeLong, Robert; Melin, Sharon; Buckles, Elizabeth; Gulland, Frances; Lowenstine, Linda; Stott, Jeffrey; Johnson, Michael

    2005 Immunogenetics

    doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0757-zpmid: 15650877

    In response to an unprecedented prevalence of cancer recently identified in free-ranging populations of California sea lions [(CSL) (Zalophus californianus], we examined the role of the immunologically important major histocompatibility (MHC) genes in this disease epidemic. Associations between MHC genes and cancer have been well established in humans, but have never before been investigated in wildlife. Using a previously developed technique employing sequence-specific primer-based PCR with intercalating dye technology, MHC genotypes were examined from 27 cancer-positive and 22 cancer-negative CSL stranded along the California coastline. Analyses elucidated an underlying immunogenetic component to the high prevalence of urogenital cancer in sea lions. Furthermore, these results demonstrate the functional relevance of CSL class II MHC by revealing a non-random nature of cancer susceptibility associated with the presence of specific genes.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Identification of peptides associated with chicken major histocompatibility complex class II molecules of B21 and B19 haplotypes

    Haeri, Mehran; Read, Leah; Wilkie, Bruce; Sharif, Shayan

    2005 Immunogenetics

    doi: 10.1007/s00251-004-0760-4pmid: 15650875

    Chicken major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules present peptides to T cells to initiate immune response. Some variants of the chicken MHC, such as B19 and B21 haplotypes, are strongly associated with susceptibility and resistance to Marek’s disease, respectively. The objective of the present study was to characterize the repertoire and origin of self-peptides presented by chicken MHC class II (B-L) molecules of B19 and B21 haplotypes. Following immunoaffinity purification of B21 and B19 B-L molecules from transformed B cell lines, their associated peptides were eluted, high performance liquid chromatography-fractionated, and sequenced by tandem mass spectrometry. Four peptides were identified associated with B21 B-L molecules. These ranged from 16 to 21 residues in length and had originated from membrane-bound, cytosolic, and mitochondrial proteins. Two of these peptides were present in form of an overlapping set, which is a common characteristic of MHC II-associated peptides. The single B19-associated peptide was 17 residues long and had originated from a cytosolic source. Presentation of endogenous peptides, such as those derived from cytosolic and mitochondrial proteins, by B-L molecules is indicative of cross-sampling between MHC class I and II antigen presentation pathways. These findings facilitate future studies aimed at elucidating mechanisms of chicken MHC association with disease resistance.

    Showing 1 to 10 of 10 Articles

    Articles per page
    Browse All Journals

    Related Journals:

    Nature GeneticsNucleic Acids ResearchGeneticsAnnual Review of GeneticsGenomicsMammalian GenomeChromosome ResearchJournal of GeneticsRussian Journal of Genetics
    The human IL-4 receptor alpha chain gene (IL4R) is highly polymorphic and controversial reports have been published with respect to the association of different single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with atopy markers. Here we analyzed the functional and associational relevance of common IL4R coding SNPs. Transfection of B cell lines expressing the IL-4R variant V75+R576 did not result in enhanced IL-4 induced CD23 expression compared to cell lines expressing the wild type IL-4R alpha chain. Transfection of the IL-4R variant P503 into a murine T cell line did not influence IL-4 induced T-cell proliferation compared to wild type constructs. Analysis of six IL4R coding SNPs (I75V, E400A, C431R, S436L, S503P, Q576R) and common haplotypes (frequency ≥0.05%) in blood donors (n =300) did not indicate a significant association with elevated serum IgE level. Moreover, the most informative IL4R coding SNPs (I75V, C431R, Q576R) and related two- and three-point haplotypes (frequency ≥0.05%) were analyzed in a second, extended group of blood donors (n =689). Again, no significant association with elevated serum IgE was detectable. We conclude that common coding SNPs in the IL4R gene are unlikely to contribute significantly to increased IgE levels and variations outside the coding region may influence atopy susceptibility.