Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2026 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

This site is protected by VikingCloud's Trusted Commerce program
      Home

    Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

    Subject:
    Infectious Diseases
    Publisher:
    Oxford University Press — Oxford University Press
    ISSN:
    0305-7453
    Scimago Journal Rank:
    203

    2026

    Volume 81
    Supplement 1 (Jun)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (Apr)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2025

    Volume 81
    Supplement 1 (Nov)Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 80
    Supplement 4 (Oct)
    Supplement 3 (Nov)
    Supplement 2 (Aug)
    Supplement 1 (Mar)
    Issue 12 (Oct)
    Issue 11 (Oct)
    Issue 10 (Aug)
    Issue 9 (Aug)
    Issue 8 (Jul)
    Issue 7 (May)
    Issue 6 (May)
    Issue 5 (Feb)
    Issue 4 (Feb)
    Issue 3 (Jan)

    2024

    Volume 80
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 79
    Supplement 1 (Sep)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Jul)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)

    2023

    Volume 79
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 78
    Supplement 2 (Nov)Supplement 1 (May)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Sep)Issue 10 (Aug)Issue 9 (Aug)Issue 8 (Jun)Issue 7 (May)Issue 6 (May)Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Feb)

    2022

    Volume 78
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 77
    Supplement 2 (Nov)Supplement 1 (Sep)Issue 12 (Oct)Issue 11 (Jul)Issue 10 (Jul)Issue 9 (Jun)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Feb)

    2021

    Volume Advance Article
    AugustJulyJulyJuneMayMayAprilAprilMarchMarchFebruary
    Volume 77
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 76
    Supplement 4 (Nov)Supplement 3 (Sep)Supplement 2 (Aug)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Sep)Issue 9 (Jun)Issue 8 (Jul)Issue 7 (Jun)Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 5 (Jan)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Feb)Issue 2 (Jan)

    2020

    Volume Advance Article
    JulyMayMayAprilApril
    Volume 2020
    JulyJuneMayAprilMarch
    Volume 76
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Dec)
    Volume 75
    Supplement 2 (Dec)Supplement 1 (Apr)Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 11 (Aug)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2019

    Volume Advance Article
    DecemberJulyJune
    Volume 2019
    August
    Volume 75
    Issue 12 (Sep)Issue 3 (Dec)
    Volume 74
    Supplement 5 (Nov)Supplement 4 (Aug)Supplement 3 (Apr)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2018

    Volume Advance Article
    Supplement 7 (Jul)Supplement 6 (Jun)JulyJulyJuneJuneMayAprilMarchIssue 8 (May)Issue 8 (May)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Mar)Issue 6 (Mar)
    Volume 73
    Supplement 6 (Jun)Supplement 5 (Apr)Supplement 4 (Mar)Supplement 3 (Mar)Supplement 2 (Feb)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)

    2017

    Volume Advance Article
    Issue 6 (Dec)
    Volume 73
    Issue 3 (Nov)
    Volume 72
    Supplement 2 (Sep)Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2016

    Volume 2016
    October
    Volume 71
    Supplement 2 (Nov)Supplement 1 (May)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2015

    Volume 70
    Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Apr)Issue 7 (Apr)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (Feb)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2014

    Volume 70
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 2 (Oct)
    Volume 69
    Supplement 1 (Sep)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2013

    Volume 68
    Supplement 3 (Nov)Supplement 2 (Jul)Supplement 1 (May)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2012

    Volume 67
    Supplement 1 (Jul)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2011

    Volume Advance Article
    August
    Volume 66
    Supplement 6 (Dec)Supplement 5 (Jun)Supplement 4 (May)Supplement 3 (Apr)Supplement 2 (Apr)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2010

    Volume 65
    Supplement 4 (Nov)Supplement 3 (Nov)Supplement 2 (Apr)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 12 (Dec)Issue 11 (Nov)Issue 10 (Oct)Issue 9 (Sep)Issue 8 (Aug)Issue 7 (Jul)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2009

    Volume 2009
    February
    Volume 64
    Supplement 1 (Sep)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 63
    Supplement 1 (May)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2008

    Volume Advance Article
    April
    Volume 2008
    December
    Volume 62
    Supplement 3 (Nov)Supplement 2 (Nov)Supplement 1 (Sep)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 61
    Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2007

    Volume 60
    Supplement 1 (Aug)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 59
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2006

    Volume Advance Article
    September
    Volume 2006
    November
    Volume 59
    Issue 2 (Nov)
    Volume 58
    Supplement 1 (Sep)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 57
    Issue 6 (Apr)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2005

    Volume 56
    Supplement 1 (Sep)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 55
    Supplement 2 (Mar)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2004

    Volume Advance Article
    September
    Volume 2004
    September
    Volume 54
    Supplement 1 (Aug)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 53
    Supplement 2 (May)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2003

    Volume Advance Article
    OctoberSeptember
    Volume 2003
    JuneMarch
    Volume 52
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 51
    Supplement 3 (Jun)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (May)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2002

    Volume Advance Article
    NovemberSeptember
    Volume 2002
    OctoberApril
    Volume 50
    Supplement 3 (Dec)Supplement 2 (Sep)Supplement 1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 49
    Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2001

    Volume Advance Article
    December
    Volume 2001
    July
    Volume 48
    Supplement 2 (Sep)Supplement 1 (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 47
    Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2000

    Volume Advance Article
    March
    Volume 46
    Supplement 3 (Jul)Supplement 2 (Aug)Supplement 1 (Aug)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 45
    Supplement 4 (Apr)Supplement 3 (Apr)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1999

    Volume 44
    Supplement 2 (Nov)Supplement 1 (Sep)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 43
    Supplement 3 (Jun)Supplement 2 (May)Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1998

    Volume 42
    Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 41
    Supplement 4 (Jun)Supplement 3 (May)Supplement 2 (Mar)Supplement 1 (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1997

    Volume 40
    Supplement 2 (Dec)Supplement 1 (Dec)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 39
    Supplement 2 (Jun)Supplement 1 (May)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1996

    Volume 38
    Supplement A (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 37
    Supplement C (Jun)Supplement B (May)Supplement A (May)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1995

    Volume 36
    Supplement B (Oct)Supplement A (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 35
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1994

    Volume 34
    Supplement A (Aug)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 33
    Supplement A (May)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1993

    Volume 32
    Supplement B (Nov)Supplement A (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 31
    Supplement E (Jan)Supplement D (Jan)Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1992

    Volume 30
    Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 29
    Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1991

    Volume 28
    Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 27
    Supplement D (Jan)Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1990

    Volume 26
    Supplement F (Jan)Supplement E (Jan)Supplement D (Jan)Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 25
    Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1989

    Volume 24
    Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 23
    Supplement E (Jan)Supplement D (Jan)Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1988

    Volume 22
    Supplement D (Oct)Supplement C (Jul)Supplement B (Jul)Supplement A (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 21
    Supplement D (Jan)Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1987

    Volume 20
    Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 19
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1986

    Volume 18
    Supplement E (Jul)Supplement D (Nov)Supplement C (Oct)Supplement B (Oct)Supplement A (Jul)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 17
    Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 16
    Issue 6 (Dec)

    1985

    Volume 16
    Supplement A (Jan)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 15
    Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1984

    Volume 14
    Supplement D (Jan)Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 13
    Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1983

    Volume 12
    Supplement D (Jan)Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 11
    Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1982

    Volume 10
    Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 9
    Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1981

    Volume 8
    Supplement D (Jan)Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Dec)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 7
    Issue 6 (Jun)Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Mar)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1980

    Volume 6
    Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1979

    Volume 5
    Supplement B (Nov)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1978

    Volume 4
    Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1977

    Volume 3
    Supplement C (Jan)Supplement B (Jan)Supplement A (Jan)Issue 6 (Nov)Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1976

    Volume 2
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1975

    Volume 1
    Supplement 4 (Dec)Supplement 3 (Sep)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    0031

    Volume 0031
    December

    0024

    Volume Advance Article
    May

    0018

    Volume 0018
    January

    0016

    Volume 0016
    January
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Preface

    1998 Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

    doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.iiipmid: N/A

    This content is only available as a PDF. © 1998 The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Roxithromycin: review of its antimicrobial activity.

    Bryskier,, A

    1998 Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

    doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.1pmid: 9579708

    Abstract Roxithromycin is a semi-synthetic 14-membered-ring macrolide antibiotic in which the erythronolide A lactone ring has been altered to prevent inactivation in the gastric milieu. The in-vitro activity of roxithromycin is well documented and similar to that of other macrolide antibiotics. Roxithromycin is active against gram-positive and gram-negative cocci, gram-positive bacilli and some gram-negative bacilli, but has no significant effect on the predominant faecal flora. It also displays good activity against atypical pathogens, such as Mycobacterium avium complex, Helicobacter pylori and Borrelia spp. It penetrates and accumulates within cells, such as macrophages and polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), where it is distributed between the cytosol and cellular granules. Once inside the cells, it is active against intracellular pathogens, such as Legionella, Chlamydia, Mycobacterium, Rickettsia and Borrelia spp. Like other macrolides, roxithromycin displays a significant post-antibiotic effect which is dependent on the pathogens under study, the concentration of roxithromycin and the duration of exposure. In vivo, roxithromycin is as effective or more effective than other macrolides in a wide range of infections. This content is only available as a PDF.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    The comparative in-vitro activity of roxithromycin and other antibiotics against Bordetella pertussis.

    Brett,, M;Short,, P;Beatson,, S

    1998 Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

    doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.23pmid: 9579709

    Abstract In spite of vaccination programmes, whooping cough epidemics continue to occur. The disease affects all age groups, although its severity is greatest in the young, with infants being particularly vulnerable. Erythromycin is generally accepted as the drug of choice both for treatment and for prophylaxis during epidemics. Roxithromycin is a macrolide with pharmacokinetic advantages over erythromycin; it is well absorbed, produces high serum concentrations, has a long half-life and penetrates respiratory secretions well. There are no accepted standards for testing the sensitivity of Bordetella pertussis to antibiotics, and reports of the activity of roxithromycin and erythromycin are variable. Using Isosensitest agar supplemented with 5% horse blood and an inoculum of 10(4) cfu, 88 strains of B. pertussis were tested for their sensitivity to roxithromycin, erythromycin, rifampicin and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole. The range of MICs was 0.12-0.5 mg/L for both roxithromycin and erythromycin. Roxithromycin was bactericidal, with an MBC of 1 mg/L (as compared with 0.5 mg/L for erythromycin). Since roxithromycin is well tolerated by children when used for respiratory tract infections, the good in-vitro activity against B. pertussis, combined with its favourable pharmacokinetics, suggest it may be a good candidate for use in the treatment and prophylaxis of whooping cough. This content is only available as a PDF.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Synergic interactions of macrolides and proton-pump inhibitors against Helicobacter pylori: a comparative in-vitro study.

    Malizia,, T;Tejada,, M;Marchetti,, F;Favini,, P;Pizzarelli,, G;Campa,, M;Senesi,, S

    1998 Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

    doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.29pmid: 9579710

    Abstract Thirty-eight clinical strains of Helicobacter pylori were isolated from patients with chronic gastritis and gastroduodenal ulceration, and their susceptibility to macrolide antibiotics (roxithromycin, flurithromycin, azithromycin, erythromycin) in combination with proton-pump inhibitors (lansoprazole and omeprazole) and bismuth subcitrate was assayed. Chequerboard titration was used to analyse the results of antimicrobial interactions and showed that the activity of macrolides was enhanced by combining them with lansoprazole, omeprazole or, to a lesser extent, bismuth subcitrate. While the interactions between erythromycin and the proton-pump inhibitors or bismuth subcitrate were always additive, the combinations of roxithromycin-lansoprazole, flurithromycin-omeprazole and azithromycin-lansoprazole acted synergically on 82%, 60% and 60% of H. pylori strains, respectively. These results may, in part, account for the enhanced clinical efficacy of macrolides administered with proton-pump inhibitors in the treatment of H. pylori-associated diseases. This content is only available as a PDF.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Anti-inflammatory activity of macrolides: a new therapeutic potential?

    Labro, M, T

    1998 Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

    doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.37pmid: 9579711

    Abstract The important role played by macrolides in the chemotherapy of infectious diseases is well established, but there is still much speculation about their anti-inflammatory potential. A review of in-vitro and ex-vivo studies reported in the literature shows that macrolides have potentially relevant immunomodulatory effects. In-vitro data suggest that erythromycin A derivatives have a direct effect on neutrophil function and the production of cytokines involved in the inflammation cascade. The ex-vivo results indicate that short-term administration of macrolides may enhance the immune response while long-term administration results in immunosuppression. Further research is required to improve our understanding of the therapeutic activity of macrolides. This content is only available as a PDF.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Comparative anti-inflammatory effects of roxithromycin, azithromycin and clarithromycin.

    Scaglione,, F;Rossoni,, G

    1998 Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

    doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.47pmid: 9579712

    Abstract There are many published reports on the anti-inflammatory effects of macrolides, some dating back to the introduction of erythromycin. Macrolides have been shown to affect a number of the processes involved in inflammation, including the migration of neutrophils, the oxidative burst in phagocytes and the production of various cytokines, although the precise mechanisms are not clear. These effects have been linked to the ability of macrolides to accumulate in mammalian cells. Roxithromycin, a macrolide with better plasma concentrations and higher tissue concentrations than erythromycin, has been tested in a standard animal model used for evaluating anti-inflammatory drugs. When rats were given a prophylactic dose (20 mg/kg), roxithromycin suppressed the oedema produced by injecting carrageenin into the paw with effects almost equal to that seen with the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug nimesulide. Azithromycin and clarithromycin, macrolides with better pharmacokinetics than erythromycin, only showed slight anti-inflammatory effects. These results confirm that roxithromycin has anti-inflammatory properties in vivo and encourage the investigation of its mode of action. This content is only available as a PDF.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Inhibitory effect of roxithromycin on adhesion of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains 3051, CF504 and LM21.

    Favre-Bonté,, S;Forestier,, C;Joly,, B

    1998 Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

    doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.51pmid: 9579713

    Abstract The effect of subinhibitory concentrations of roxithromycin on the adhesion of three strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae to Int-407 cells was studied. Adherence was markedly inhibited and the effect was increased when roxithromycin was added to the cell culture medium rather than to the bacterial growth medium. Several assays were performed in order to understand the mechanism by which roxithromycin exerted this inhibitory effect. The greatest effect was obtained when roxithromycin was concentrated in the extracellular compartment; when roxithromycin was concentrated in the intracellular compartment, the inhibitory effect was reduced. The analysis of adhesion factors of bacteria showed that exposure to roxithromycin did not alter their apparent structure or quantity. Roxithromycin appears to interfere in the interaction between bacteria and eukaryotic receptors. This content is only available as a PDF.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Experimental evaluation of roxithromycin combined with dapsone or sulphamethoxazole on Pneumocystis carinii and Toxoplasma gondii dual infections in a rat model.

    Brun-Pascaud,, M;Chau,, F;Derouin,, F;Girard, P, M

    1998 Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

    doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.57pmid: 9579714

    Abstract We have developed a dual infection model in immunosuppressed rats for evaluating drugs against Pneumocystis carinii and Toxoplasma gondii, two important opportunistic pathogens in patients with AIDS. Using this model, we reported that the macrolide roxithromycin was effective at a daily dose of 400 mg/kg in preventing the development of T. gondii infection but did not have a prophylactic effect against P. carinii in the same rats. A lower dose (200 mg/kg/day) had only marginal effects. Extending these experiments, we have now shown that roxithromycin at doses of 400 or 200 mg/kg/day combined with dapsone at doses of 5, 25 or 50 mg/kg/day completely prevented the development of T. gondii infection, with no parasites being detected in any of the tissues sampled. Roxithromycin at either dose combined with dapsone at 25 or 50 mg/kg/day was also effective in preventing the development of P. carinii infection in the lungs. The lowest dose of dapsone (5 mg/kg/day) was not fully effective. Pyrimethamine-dapsone, a combination used clinically, was tested in the same experiment, and gave results comparable to those with roxithromycin-dapsone combinations. In a further experiment combining roxithromycin with sulphamethoxazole, roxithromycin was effective in preventing the T. gondii infection, even when given at only 200 mg/kg/day with 20 mg/kg/day of sulphamethoxazole. When the dose of sulphamethoxazole was reduced to 2 mg/kg/day and given with roxithromycin 200 mg/kg/day, T. gondii infection developed in two of the five rats treated. P. carinii infection was prevented by sulphamethoxazole at 20 mg/kg/day but not completely by 2 mg/kg/day. Roxithromycin also has activity against Mycobacterium avium, another important cause of opportunistic infections in AIDS patients, and the compound penetrates mammalian cells well. Taken together with the favourable pharmacokinetic profile of roxithromycin, these results suggest that it may have a clinical utility, when used with other agents, in controlling the development of opportunistic infections caused by M. avium complex, T. gondii and P. carinii in HIV-infected individuals. This content is only available as a PDF.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Computer-aided prediction of macrolide antibiotic concentrations in human circulating polymorphonuclear leucocytes.

    Bouvier d'Yvoire, M, J;Dresco, I, A;Tulkens, P, M

    1998 Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

    doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.63pmid: 9579715

    Abstract The relative in-vivo intracellular concentration of various macrolides in phagocytes cannot be directly extrapolated from in-vitro experiments that use a fixed and constant extracellular concentration for all compounds, since this fails to consider different rates of intracellular penetration, dosage regimens and pharmacokinetic data. In the proposed model, which takes into account the free plasma concentrations and accumulation characteristics of three antibiotics, roxithromycin, azithromycin and erythromycin, we show that roxithromycin and azithromycin may reach similar concentrations in human polymorphonuclear leucocytes when conditions mimic clinical administration of these drugs, while erythromycin concentrations are lower. This approach may be useful to predict the behaviour of other drugs or other cells, and to assist in the design of rational treatment schemes. This content is only available as a PDF.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Efficacy and tolerance of roxithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.

    Tatsis,, G;Tsoukalas,, G;Boulbasakos,, G;Platsouka,, E;Anagnostopoulou,, M;Pirounaki,, M;Paniara,, O;Sioula,, E;Raptis,, J;Saroglou,, G

    1998 Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

    doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.69pmid: 9579716

    Showing 1 to 10 of 14 Articles

    Previous12Next
    Articles per page
    Browse All Journals

    Related Journals:

    BMC Infectious DiseasesCurrent Infectious Disease ReportsCurrent Fungal Infection ReportsInfectious Disease Reports
    Issue 1 (Jan)
    Issue 3 (Mar)
    Issue 2 (Feb)
    Issue 1 (Jan)
    Abstract In an open, randomized, parallel group study, the efficacy and tolerance of roxithromycin 300 mg po od was compared with clarithromycin 500 mg po bd in the treatment of 60 patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). The two groups were well-matched demographically. Fifty patients (25 per group) were clinically evaluable at the end of the study and a satisfactory response was found in 88% of those given roxithromycin and 80% of those given clarithromycin. All had received treatment for a minimum of 3 days. Only one (3.3%) of 30 patients in the roxithromycin group reported adverse events compared with seven (23.3%) of 30 in the clarithromycin group. Thus both roxithromycin and clarithromycin are effective in the treatment of LRTI but roxithromycin is better tolerated (P < 0.05) with the advantage of a once-daily dose. This content is only available as a PDF.