Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2026 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

This site is protected by VikingCloud's Trusted Commerce program
      Home

    Phytoparasitica

    Subject:
    Insect Science
    Publisher:
    Springer Netherlands — Springer Journals
    ISSN:
    0334-2123
    Scimago Journal Rank:
    47

    2026

    Volume 54
    Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Feb)

    2025

    Volume 54
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 53
    Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2024

    Volume 52
    Issue 5 (Nov)
    Issue 4 (Sep)
    Issue 3 (Jul)
    Issue 2 (Apr)
    Issue 1 (Mar)

    2023

    Volume 51
    Supplement 1 (Nov)Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2022

    Volume OnlineFirst
    January
    Volume 50
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2021

    Volume 49
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2020

    Volume 49
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 48
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2019

    Volume 47
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2018

    Volume 47
    Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 46
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2017

    Volume 46
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 45
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Mar)

    2016

    Volume 45
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 44
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2015

    Volume 44
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 43
    Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Feb)

    2014

    Volume 43
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 42
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Feb)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Mar)

    2013

    Volume 42
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 41
    Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)

    2012

    Volume 41
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 40
    Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jan)

    2011

    Volume 40
    Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 39
    Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (May)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2010

    Volume 39
    Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 38
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 5
    Issue 1 (Jan)

    2009

    Volume 38
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 37
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 33
    Issue 2 (Feb)
    Volume 30
    Issue 3 (May)
    Volume 22
    Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 18
    Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 16
    Issue 3 (Sep)
    Volume 10
    Issue 4 (Jan)
    Volume 9
    Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 1 (Aug)
    Volume 8
    Issue 3 (Aug)
    Volume 3
    Issue 2 (Aug)

    2008

    Volume 37
    Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 36
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 35
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 34
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 33
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 32
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 31
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 30
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 29
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 28
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 27
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 26
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 25
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 24
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 23
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 22
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)
    Volume 21
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 20
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 19
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 18
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)
    Volume 17
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 16
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 15
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 14
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 13
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 12
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 11
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 10
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 8
    Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 7
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 6
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 5
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 4
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 3
    Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 2
    Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 1
    Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Oct)

    2006

    Volume 34
    Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2005

    Volume 33
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Mar)

    2004

    Volume 32
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2003

    Volume 31
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2002

    Volume 30
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2001

    Volume 29
    Supplement 1 (Feb)Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2000

    Volume 28
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1999

    Volume 27
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1998

    Volume 26
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1997

    Volume 25
    Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1996

    Volume 24
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1995

    Volume 23
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1994

    Volume 22
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1993

    Volume 21
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1992

    Volume 20
    Supplement 1 (Mar)Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1991

    Volume 19
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1990

    Volume 18
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1989

    Volume 17
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 16
    Issue 3 (Sep)

    1988

    Volume 16
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1987

    Volume 15
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1986

    Volume 14
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1985

    Volume 13
    Issue 3-4 (Dec)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1984

    Volume 12
    Issue 3-4 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1983

    Volume 11
    Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)

    1982

    Volume 10
    Issue 4 (Dec)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1981

    Volume 9
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1980

    Volume 8
    Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1979

    Volume 7
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)

    1978

    Volume 6
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Feb)

    1977

    Volume 5
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Oct)

    1976

    Volume 4
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Aug)Issue 1 (Apr)

    1975

    Volume 3
    Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Jun)

    1974

    Volume 2
    Issue 2 (Dec)

    1973

    Volume 1
    Issue 2 (Dec)
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Pesticide Application: Current status and further developments

    Matthews, G. A.

    1997 Phytoparasitica

    doi: 10.1007/bf02980327pmid: N/A

    Pesticides are applied principally as water-based sprays through hydraulic nozzles, often with large volumes of water. Such treatment is usually effective, but inefficient. Improvements are needed to reduce contamination of users and the environment; achieve better integration with biological factors; and minimize selection of resistant pest populations. Nozzle selection is aimed at improving application with less environmental contamination. Other new developments, including closed transfer systems, air assistance and use of rotary atomization and electrostatics, are discussed.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Harry FrankelIn Memoriam

    Grinstein, Avi; Katan, Jaacov

    1997 Phytoparasitica

    doi: 10.1007/bf02980325pmid: N/A

    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Preface

    Grinstein, A.; Matthews, G. A.

    1997 Phytoparasitica

    doi: 10.1007/bf02980326pmid: N/A

    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Improved chemical control of botrytis blight in roses

    Grinstein, A.; Riven, Y.; Elad, Y.

    1997 Phytoparasitica

    doi: 10.1007/bf02980335pmid: N/A

    Botrytis cinerea causes latent infections of rose flowers, which can develop into aggressive rot (botrytis blight) at pre- and postharvest stages. Botrytis blight is the cause of major rose flower losses. The effect of deposit and cover density of fungicides (pyrimethanil or prochloraz-Zn—folpet) on the development of botrytis blight was tested. For pyrimethanil drop size and cover density (ranging between 80 and 1000μm drops/cm2) had no effect on disease rate, if the pesticide deposit was sufficient for disease control. For prochloraz-Zn— folpet, however, control efficacy (for equal deposit) increased with cover density. Secondary distribution of pyrimethanil was by the vapor phase. Effective control was obtained when rose petals were exposed only to pyrimethanil vapors, while any direct contact with the fungicide was prevented; no control was recorded for prochloraz-Zn—folpet under these conditions. Botrytis blight was delayed in cut flowers when bunches of 20 flowers were wrapped in packing paper strips or cellophane bags which had been sprayed previously with pyrimethanil and packed (20 bunches) in cardboard boxes. No pesticide stains could be seen on the flowers.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Improvement of soil solarization with volatile compounds generated from organic Amendments

    Gamliel, A.; Stapleton, J. J.

    1997 Phytoparasitica

    doi: 10.1007/bf02980329pmid: N/A

    Combining organic amendments with soil solarization is a nonchemical approach to improvement of the control of soilborne plant diseases. Pathogen control in solarized— amended soil is attributed to a combination of thermal killing and enhanced generation of biotoxic volatile compounds. Apparently, pathogen sensitivity to biotoxic volatile compounds is enhanced with an increase of soil temperature and acts in combination with antagonistic microbial activity. Enhanced biocontrol also may be involved with some amendments. Toxic volatile compounds including alcohols, aldehydes, sulfides, isothiocyanates, and others were detected in soil amended with cruciferous residues during heating. Field solarization of soil amended with composted chicken manure gave better control of pathogens and higher yield of lettuce and tomato than either treatment alone.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Inert components: Are they really so?

    Stanghellini, M.

    1997 Phytoparasitica

    doi: 10.1007/bf02980334pmid: N/A

    Zoosporic plant pathogens are associated with destructive root and foliar diseases of numerous crops. This paper describes events which led to the discovery, specificity, and potential significance of surfactants (which are commonly considered the ‘inert’ components of many fungicides) in the control of zoosporic pathogens. The latter include certain downy mildews and numerous species in the generaPythiwn andPhytophthora. Zoospores are the weak link in the life cycle of these pathogens because they have no cell wall. The absence of a cell wall imparts a high degree of vulnerability to this spore stage and surfactants were demonstrated to rupture selectively the plasma membrane which encases the zoospore, thereby resulting in the rapid death of the zoospore.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Oil and emulsion formulations of a microbial control agent increase the potency against a wider range of pest life stages

    Smith, Penelope Ann

    1997 Phytoparasitica

    doi: 10.1007/bf02980336pmid: N/A

    Integrated pest control of the whitefly,Bemisia argentifolii (Bellows & Perring), depends heavily on biological control. The insect pathogenic fungusPaecilomyces fumosoroseus (Wise) Brown & Smith is being developed for control of this pest. Oil and emulsion formulations of fungal conidia are known to enable infection at low field humidities. These formulations also increase the infectivity to a wider range of whitefly instars as compared to aqueous formulations.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Automatic pesticide application in greenhouses

    Austerweil, Miriam; Grinstein, A.

    1997 Phytoparasitica

    doi: 10.1007/bf02980333pmid: N/A

    Three automatic pesticide application systems are presented: an automatic thermal vaporimeter; a cold fogger (low volume mist applicator or mechanical aerosol generator); and an automatic air-assisted sprayer for controlled droplet application (CDA). The automatic thermal vaporimeter is thermally regulated to prevent spontaneous ignition of the evaporated pesticide, and is equipped with an automatic quantity-control system. One vaporimeter is capable of treating an area of 0.4 ha when an air circulation system is operated. The efficacy of some commercially available cold foggers for pest control was evaluated in various crops (rose, gerbera, gypsophila, tomato) and under different application conditions in plastic houses in Israel. Uniform spray distribution and good penetration into the foliage, with a high ratio of the deposits on upper: lower leaf surfaces and lower: upper parts of the plants, were obtained when assisted by indoor air movement (e.g. by horizontal air blowers). There was a high correlation between the deposition patterns produced by cold foggers and their biological efficacy against pests and disease agents. The third system—the automatic CDA air-assisted sprayer—was designed with the purpose to benefit from the advantages of the knapsack mist blower, at the same time avoiding operator mistakes. It consists of an air-assisted sprayer, self-propelled along a monorail, which revolves on its axis during its forward movement, applying drops in the 100 μm volume median diameter size range and leaving an even deposit within a 14–18-m-wide swath. The advantages of automatic pesticide application systems are: no exposure of the operator to toxic materials; increased efficiency and effectiveness; optimal timing; and reduced error by the operator. Reduced pesticide dosages make them of increasing importance in modern agriculture.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Spray deposits: Opportunities for improved efficiency of utilizationvia quality, quantity and formulation

    Hall, Franklin R.

    1997 Phytoparasitica

    doi: 10.1007/bf02980330pmid: N/A

    Pesticides are under an increasing array of criticism by the public and policy makers as being excessively hazardous to the environment. This has resulted in a wide variety of pesticide use reduction programs for agriculture worldwide. These include less active ingredient per unit area, safer products, and new delivery systems. As a result of these policies, and regulatory thrusts, there are numerous opportunities for improved efficiency of utilization with a better understanding of droplet placement criteria, including spray droplet quality,e.g. size/density parameters, formulation interactions, and a better educated user. This minireview revisits some recent trends in our efforts to improve the dose-transfer efficiency of the modern crop protection agents.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Improving spray penetration and reducing drift with the winglet boom

    Hirsch, I.

    1997 Phytoparasitica

    doi: 10.1007/bf02980331pmid: N/A

    Trials were conducted to study spray deposition in the cotton canopy and downwind drift using a conventional boom and nozzle arrangement, in comparison with an experimental boom onto which 15 airfoil-shaped ‘winglets’ were attached. The aircraft used was an Ayres Turbo Thrush. Spray deposition was assessed by analysis of the fluorescent tracer distributed over cotton string placed in a cotton field, inside the canopy and on both sides of cotton leaves collected from the top and inside the canopy. Drift was compared by flying two aircraft simultaneously, each with its respective boom, flying 1 km apart at 90° to the wind direction, spraying water over horizontal and vertical water-sensitive card samplers. Droplet count was recorded from card sampler lines, located downwind at a distance of 50 m up to 200 m. Results have shown that the winglet boom, when operated 1 m above the canopy, produces a better deposit than the conventional boom and nozzle at various levels in the canopy, on the upper sides of the leaves; the deposit on the underside of leaves in the upper part of the cotton plant is also increased. More drift was detected with the conventional boom and nozzle arrangement on both vertical and horizontal targets.

    Showing 1 to 10 of 13 Articles

    Previous12Next
    Articles per page
    Browse All Journals

    Related Journals:

    ApidologieAnnals of the Entomological Society of AmericaJournal of Apicultural ResearchNeotropical EntomologyApplied Entomology and ZoologyInsectsFlyInternational Journal of AcarologyEntomological ResearchNew Zealand Entomologist