journal article
LitStream Collection
Home
Sonnino, Roberta E; Sonnino, Victor G
doi: 10.1097/acm.0000000000005752pmid: 38691838
Left-handedness in a world of right lateral bias can be an invisible barrier both in everyday life as well as in medical career development, and throughout a medical career. Common everyday life actions, including screwing in lightbulbs, inserting a screw, or any action that requires a clockwise rotation, is designed for “righties,” making life for “lefties” a challenge. Other examples include writing without a slant or without smudging. In medicine, the physical examination of a patient is taught using the right hand and standing on the right side of the patient, an awkward situation for left handers. Another major concern in medicine specifically, is handwriting—notoriously poor in lefties—impacting legibility in progress notes, prescriptions, and medical records. In surgery and other procedural specialties in particular, using instruments intended for right-handed individuals, including suturing and positioning at the operating room table, presents left-handed individuals with particular challenges. Left-handed medical students and residents are especially vulnerable, as they may feel uncomfortable requesting special accommodations for their “handedness.” The significance and impact of handedness often go unrecognized, yet may play a substantial role in career choices: the difficulties of being left-handed may dissuade students from pursuing their desired career. Solutions are available, including using instruments designed for left-handers (or learning to use “righty” instruments), and positioning at the operating room or procedure table as preferred by the left-handed individual. These solutions often require a cooperative attitude by colleagues. The authors describe the significance of handedness, including their own personal experiences, and offer some solutions for left-handed individuals who struggle to adapt to a right-handed world.
Hafferty, Frederic W; Hamstra, Stanley J
doi: 10.1097/acm.0000000000005735pmid: 38602892
Over the past decade, entrustable professional activities (EPAs) have become an important element in the competency-based medical education movement. In this Commentary, the authors explore informed consent as an EPA within resident surgical training. In doing so, they foreground the concept of culture and reexamine the nature of trust and entrustment decisions from within a cultural framework. The authors identify role modeling and professional identity formation as core elements in the training process and suggest that faculty are sometimes better off using these tools than uncritically adopting a formal EPA framework for what is, in essence, a professionally oriented and values-based moral enterprise. They conclude that EPAs work best when they are developed at a local level, stressing the unique culture of specialty and program as well as the care that must be taken when attempting to transfer notions of entrustment from the undergraduate medical education level to graduate medical education settings.
Brown-Young, Diane; Papich, Theresa A; Jhaveri, Stacie; Nielsen, Craig; Pardee, Marcy; Betchkal, Rylee; Porter, Eboni; Meeks, Lisa M
doi: 10.1097/acm.0000000000005743pmid: 38639603
Students with physical disabilities are underrepresented in medicine, driven in part by ableist beliefs about the ability of individuals with disabilities to complete procedure-based or surgically oriented clerkships, including obstetrics and gynecology (Ob/Gyn). There is a growing commitment to disability inclusion by medical and specialty training associations. Yet published case studies and accommodation protocols for medical student wheelchair users navigating an Ob/Gyn clerkship are absent in the literature. This article describes successful disability inclusion for an Ob/Gyn clerkship, including accommodations for medical student wheelchair users. The authors share mechanisms to address and combat ableist assumptions and facilitate access for future medical students by working collaboratively with student and key stakeholders to develop an inclusive and accessible training experience.These recommendations are shared through the story of a third-year medical student who rotated through the longitudinal clerkships at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine. The student, an individual with osteogenesis imperfecta who uses a power wheelchair with a seat elevator, completed third-year rotations and thrived in her clinical experiences. The authors describe her journey through a robust 4-week Ob/Gyn clerkship, in which she fulfilled the required clinical core conditions and observation skills with reasonable accommodation. Given the high acuity, surgery, and outpatient demands in Ob/Gyn—and the transferrable skills to other clerkships—the student’s experience is an excellent exemplar for demonstrating disability inclusion and reasonable accommodation.Ob/Gyn clerkship directors and clinical faculty can broadly use the recommended timelines and communication protocols to create accessible training environments. With student input, minor scheduling adjustments, ongoing communication, reasonable accommodations, and an open mind, medical students on the clinical wards who are wheelchair users can successfully navigate the required expectations of medical training.
Handorf, Anna; Healy, Michael G; Klouda, Anna; Lu, Alice; Moawad, Iman; Tan, Weizhen; Park, Yoon Soo; Frey-Vogel, Ariel
doi: 10.1097/acm.0000000000005718pmid: 38527049
In busy clinical environments, educational opportunities must be designed to accommodate learner-specific needs. Many adult learners prefer short, relevant, technology-enhanced learning. As such, electronic learning (e-learning) experiences have become a prominent part of medical education. Yet, there remain challenges to e-learning experiences in the current educational landscape. To address these challenges, the authors developed the TinyTalks paradigm, which serves as the educational foundation for the TinyTalks curriculum.The TinyTalks paradigm was developed using the existing e-learning literature and foundational principles of adult learning and related theories. The TinyTalks paradigm includes 3 ground rules: (1) all TinyTalks videos must identify a category (approach to, explanation of, or application of) to clarify the focus of the topic, (2) all TinyTalks videos must be less than 7 minutes with all material presented on one virtual chalkboard screen, and (3) all TinyTalks videos must use the hook, frame, and delivery model, which guides the creation of the video. The resulting TinyTalks curriculum is an online repository of short, chalk talk–style educational videos, developed by interdisciplinary health professionals and targeted to the level of trainees, that is available to be used flexibly by learners for just-in-time learning, flipped classroom sessions, and/or self-study.The authors used Kern’s 6-step approach to curriculum development as the conceptual framework for the development and implementation of the TinyTalks curriculum at Mass General for Children (June 2021–January 2023). While developing and implementing the curriculum, the authors focused on topic selection, stakeholder recruitment, establishing a process flow, and creating a virtual home.The authors believe the TinyTalks paradigm outlines an effective educational strategy that accommodates the unique needs of both learners and teachers in the medical education setting. The next steps are to scale the TinyTalks curriculum up by expanding the content library and to evaluate its efficacy.
Ellaway, Rachel H; O’Brien, Bridget C; Sherbino, Jonathan; Maggio, Lauren A; Artino, Anthony R; Nimmon, Laura; Park, Yoon Soo; Young, Meredith; Thomas, Aliki
doi: 10.1097/acm.0000000000005730pmid: 38574241
What constitutes evidence, what value evidence has, and how the needs of knowledge producers and those who consume this knowledge might be better aligned are questions that continue to challenge the health sciences. In health professions education (HPE), debates on these questions have ebbed and flowed with little sense of resolution or progress. In this article, the authors explore whether there is a problem with evidence in HPE using thought experiments anchored in Argyris’ learning loops framework.From a single-loop perspective (“How are we doing?”), there may be many problems with evidence in HPE, but little is known about how research evidence is being used in practice and policy. A double-loop perspective (“Could we do better?”) suggests expectations of knowledge producers and knowledge consumers might be too high, which suggests more system-wide approaches to evidence-informed practice in HPE are needed. A triple-loop perspective (“Are we asking the right questions?”) highlights misalignments between the dynamics of research and decision-making, such that scholarly inquiry may be better approached as a way of advancing broader conversations, rather than contributing to specific decision-making processes.The authors ask knowledge producers and consumers to be more attentive to the translation from knowledge to evidence. They also argue for more systematic tracking and audit of how research knowledge is used as evidence. Given that research does not always have to serve practical purposes or address the problems of a particular program or institution, the relationship between knowledge and evidence should be understood in terms of changing conversations and influencing decisions.
Showing 1 to 10 of 23 Articles