A Career Life-Cycle Perspective on Women's Health and SafetyKaplan, Robert S.; Chukwura, Chizoba L.; Gorman, Gregory H.; Lee, Vivian S.; Good, Chester B.; Martin, Kathleen L.; Ator, Gregory A.; Parkinson, Michael D.
doi: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002504pmid: 35121690
Objective:Women's health has demanded more attention from employers as women integrated into the workforce. Traditionally male-dominant fields and occupations require special attention to workplace design, physical standards for entry, employment practices, equipment, and health monitoring. This editorial summarizes the Defense Health Board's (DHB) review of Active Duty Women's Health and its recommendations grounded in a woman's career life-cycle.Methods:The DHB reviewed the Department of Defense and foreign militaries’ current women's health services, relevant policies and practices, peer-reviewed scientific literature, and subject matter expert interviews.Results:The DHB's recommendations centered on a comprehensive approach to education, health care access and treatment, professional workforce development, workplace standards and equipment, and accountable outcomes metrics to guide improvement.Conclusions:Employers can learn how to reduce morbidity, leading to a healthier and more productive female workforce.
OSHA Workplace Violence EnforcementArbury, Sheila; Collins, Natasha R.; Magtahas, Janette; Holmes, Mikki; Hodgson, Michael J.
doi: 10.1097/jom.0000000000002482pmid: 35019893
OSHA inspections represent represent a “passive” surveillance system, with outcomes, citations or hazard alert letters, ie, recommendations, an indirect indicator of problem severity suggesting some recent improvement. Criteria statements developed from OSHA program recommendations represent a simplified self-assessment tool and support the distinction between OSHA citations and recommendations.