Select data courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.

© 2026 DeepDyve, Inc. All rights reserved.

This site is protected by VikingCloud's Trusted Commerce program
      Home

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)

    Subject:
    Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
    Publisher:
    Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company — Oxford University Press
    ISSN:
    1369-7412
    Scimago Journal Rank:
    133

    2026

    Volume 88
    Issue 2 (Mar)

    2025

    Volume 88
    Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 87
    Issue 5 (Jun)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Mar)

    2024

    Volume 87
    Issue 3 (Nov)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 86
    Issue 5 (May)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)
    Volume 85
    Issue 5 (Feb)

    2023

    Volume 86
    Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Sep)
    Volume 85
    Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2022

    Volume 84
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2021

    Volume 84
    Issue 5 (Aug)
    Volume 83
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2020

    Volume 82
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Feb)

    2019

    Volume 2019
    Issue 1910 (Oct)
    Volume 81
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2018

    Volume 80
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 34
    Issue 2 (Dec)

    2017

    Volume 2021
    Issue 1711 (Nov)
    Volume 80
    Issue 3 (Dec)
    Volume 79
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2016

    Volume 78
    Issue 5 (Jan)Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2015

    Volume 77
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2014

    Volume 76
    Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (May)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2013

    Volume 76
    Issue 5 (Dec)Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Sep)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 75
    Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Jan)

    2012

    Volume 75
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Oct)Issue 1 (Jul)
    Volume 74
    Issue 5 (Mar)Issue 4 (Mar)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2011

    Volume 74
    Issue 2 (Nov)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 73
    Issue 5 (Aug)Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2010

    Volume 72
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2009

    Volume 71
    Issue 5 (Jul)Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 3 (Jun)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 64
    Issue 3 (Dec)

    2008

    Volume 71
    Issue 3 (Dec)Issue 2 (Dec)Issue 1 (Oct)
    Volume 70
    Issue 5 (Sep)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Feb)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 66
    Issue 3 (Jun)
    Volume 65
    Issue 4 (Jun)
    Volume 64
    Issue 3 (Jun)
    Volume 62
    Issue 4 (Oct)
    Volume 61
    Issue 4 (Jun)
    Volume 60
    Issue 4 (Jun)Issue 1 (Jun)
    Volume 59
    Issue 4 (Jun)

    2007

    Volume 70
    Issue 1 (Nov)
    Volume 69
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2006

    Volume 68
    Issue 5 (Oct)Issue 4 (Jul)Issue 3 (Apr)Issue 2 (Mar)

    2005

    Volume 68
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 67
    Issue 5 (Nov)Issue 4 (Aug)Issue 3 (May)Issue 2 (Mar)

    2004

    Volume 67
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 66
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)

    2003

    Volume 66
    Issue 1 (Dec)
    Volume 65
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Apr)Issue 1 (Jan)

    2002

    Volume 64
    Issue 4 (Oct)Issue 3 (Aug)Issue 2 (Jun)Issue 1 (Mar)
    Volume 63
    Issue 4 (Apr)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 62
    Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 61
    Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 60
    Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)
    Volume 59
    Issue 4 (Jan)Issue 3 (Jan)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1996

    Volume 58
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1995

    Volume 57
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1994

    Volume 56
    Issue 4 (Nov)Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1993

    Volume 55
    Issue 4 (Sep)Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1992

    Volume 54
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1991

    Volume 53
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1990

    Volume 52
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1989

    Volume 51
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1988

    Volume 50
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1987

    Volume 49
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1986

    Volume 48
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1985

    Volume 47
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1984

    Volume 46
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1983

    Volume 45
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1982

    Volume 44
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1981

    Volume 43
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1980

    Volume 42
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1979

    Volume 41
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1978

    Volume 40
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1977

    Volume 39
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1976

    Volume 38
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1975

    Volume 37
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1974

    Volume 36
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1973

    Volume 35
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 2 (Jan)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1972

    Volume 34
    Issue 3 (Jul)Issue 1 (Sep)

    1971

    Volume 33
    Issue 3 (Oct)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1970

    Volume 32
    Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1969

    Volume 31
    Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1968

    Volume 30
    Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1967

    Volume 29
    Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1966

    Volume 28
    Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1965

    Volume 27
    Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1964

    Volume 26
    Issue 3 (Sep)Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1963

    Volume 25
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1962

    Volume 24
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1961

    Volume 23
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1960

    Volume 22
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1959

    Volume 21
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1958

    Volume 20
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1957

    Volume 19
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1956

    Volume 18
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1955

    Volume 17
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1954

    Volume 16
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1953

    Volume 15
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1952

    Volume 14
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1951

    Volume 13
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1950

    Volume 12
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1949

    Volume 11
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1948

    Volume 10
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1947

    Volume 9
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1946

    Volume 8
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1941

    Volume 7
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1939

    Volume 6
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1938

    Volume 5
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1937

    Volume 4
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1936

    Volume 3
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1935

    Volume 2
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)

    1934

    Volume 1
    Issue 2 (Jul)Issue 1 (Jan)
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Stochastic Models for Earthquake Occurrence

    Vere‐Jones, D.

    1970 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)

    doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00814.xpmid: N/A

    This paper attempts to survey some of the stochastic models which have been proposed for the sequence of energies and origin times of earthquakes from a given region, and to describe some examples of their application. to a good approximation in a regional study, each earthquake may be regarded as a point event, and consequently the main emphasis is on stochastic point processes. The theory of such processes is developed in a form suitable for this context, with particular emphasis being given to the clustering models of Neymann–Scott and Bartlett–Lewis. The use of these models is illustrated with reference to earthquake data from New Zealand. A final Section is concerned with stochastic models for aftershock sequences—the trains of smaller shocks which frequently follow the occurrence of large shallow earthquakes.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Discussion on Professor Vere‐Jones's Paper

    1970 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)

    doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00815.xpmid: N/A

    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    The Measurement of Association of Rows and Columns for an r × s Contingency Table

    Altham, Patricia M. E.

    1970 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)

    doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00816.xpmid: N/A

    The generalization of Edwards's argument for the measure of association of the rows and columns of 2 times 2 table, to that of an r x s table whose rows and columns are assumed unordered, shows, not surprisingly, that association ought to be measured by some function of the (r — 1)(s — 1) cross‐ratios. Such a function is suggested by the introduction of a metric on certain equivalence classes. The properties of such metrics are examined, and in particular comparisons are made with Good's suggestion of the use of the algebraic rank of the contingency table, and with Lindley's significance test for association in the r x s table.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    A Bivariate Non‐Parametric C‐Sample Test

    Mardia, K. V.

    1970 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)

    doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00817.xpmid: N/A

    A non‐parametric test for the bivariate c‐sample problem is proposed. The test is an extension of a bivariate two‐sample test given by Mardia (1967) and possesses various desirable properties. We derive the asymptotic distribution of this test and obtain the Pitman efficiency of the test relative to Wilks's criterion A for the translation types of alternatives. We give the critical values of the distribution and some approximations. The test is applied to a numerical example.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    A Probability Plotting Procedure for General Analysis of Variance

    Gnanadesikan, R.; Wilk, M. B.

    1970 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)

    doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00818.xpmid: N/A

    This paper describes a generalization of probability plotting to supplement general analysis of variance procedures. The mean squares in a general orthogonal analysis of variance are ordered and plotted against the corresponding expected values of standardized ordered mean squares. Since the mean squares may have differing degrees of freedom, alternate conceptions are possible with respect to association of the ordered mean squares with their parent distributions.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Inequalities in the Theory of Queues

    Kingman, J. F. C.

    1970 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)

    doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00819.xpmid: N/A

    Some simple inequalities are established for the stationary waiting time distribution in the queue GI/G/k, both for the single‐server case k = 1 and for general values of k.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    On Priority Queues in Heavy Traffic

    Mazumdar, Sati

    1970 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)

    doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00820.xpmid: N/A

    For single‐server, first‐come‐first‐served queues, specified completely by the sequences of interarrival times and service times, if these sequences are stationary and if (in some sense) there is not too much dependence within or between them, it has been shown by Kingman (1962) that the waiting‐time distribution is, in heavy traffic, approximately negative exponential. This result has been extended in the present paper when there are two types of customer, one type of customer having priority of service over that of the other.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    Use of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Cramér–Von Mises and Related Statistics Without Extensive Tables

    Stephens, M. A.

    1970 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)

    doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00821.xpmid: N/A

    This paper gives modifications of eleven statistics, usually used for goodness of fit, so as to dispense with the usual tables of percentage points. Some test situations are illustrated, and formulae given for calculating significance levels.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    On Bounds Useful in the Theory of Symmetrical Factorial Designs

    Gulati, B. R.; Kounias, E. G.

    1970 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)

    doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00822.xpmid: N/A

    Consider a finite n‐dimensional projective space PG(n, s) over a Galois field of order s = ph (where p, h are positive integers and p is a prime characteristic of the field). A set of k distinct points in PG(n, s), no four coplanar, is said to be complete if there exists no other set with kx points with k1 > k. The number of points in a maximal complete set is denoted by m4(n+ 1, s). The exact value of m4(n + 1, 2) is known for n ≤ 7. When n ≥ 8, the best upper bound on m4(n+1, 2) is due to Seiden (1964). It is the purpose of this paper to show that m4(4, s) = s+1 for s > 4 and to obtain bounds for m4(n + 1, s), n > 3.
    journal article
    LitStream Collection
    On the Asymptotic Relative Efficiencies of Certain Location Parameter Estimates

    Loynes, R. M.

    1970 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)

    doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1970.tb00823.xpmid: N/A

    If, by analogy with means and medians, one computes that value such that the sum of the absolute pth powers of the sample deviations about that point takes on its minimum, one obtains an estimate of the central value of a symmetric distribution. Such estimates, for p ≥ 1 and under reasonable conditions, are known to be asymptotically normal as the sample size becomes large, and here the asymptotic relative efficiency of any pair is obtained, both for the general case and when the distribution sampled is also supposed unimodal.

    Showing 1 to 10 of 14 Articles

    Previous12Next
    Articles per page
    Browse All Journals

    Related Journals: