TY - JOUR
AU - Zingraff, Matthew T.
AB - ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE A AS DETERMINANT OF PRISONIZATION An of the of Alienation Analysis Consequences CHARLES W. THOMAS Green State and Bowling University Center for Inc. Policy Research, New York MATTHEW T. ZINGRAFF Green State Bowling University A n extensive volume of research increasingly criminological has focused on both the determinants and of consequences and prisonization (Clemmer, 1940, 1951; Hayner Ash, 1940; McCorkle and Schrag, 1944, 1954; Korn, 1954; Sykes, 1956, 1958; Fisher, 1961, 1965; Garrity, 1961; Wheeler, 1961; Tittle and Garabedian, 1963, 1964; Tittle, 1964; Glaser, 1964; Ward and Kassebaum, 1964, 1965; Giallombardo, 1966a, and 1966b; Wellford, 1967; Atchley McCabe, 1968; Mathiesen, 1968; Tittle, Thomas and 1969; Edwards, 1970; Foster, 1972, Neal et 1973; Zingraff, 1973; Thomas, 1973a; al., 1974; Thomas and The of this literature Poole, 1975). preponderance has shown that exerts a influence in prisonization major correctional an influence that counter- institutions, appears for those who seek to successful rehabil- productive implement itation Thomas and programs (e.g., Thomas, 1973b; Poole, As studies of have 1975). comparative prison organizations become it has become clear that available, however, increasingly the content of the normative into which inmates system become assimilated is not either or necessarily oppositional AUTHORS' NOTE: this 
TI - Organizational Structure as a Determinant of Prisonization
JF - Pacific Sociological Review
DO - 10.2307/1388745
DA - 1976-01-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/sage/organizational-structure-as-a-determinant-of-prisonization-61bOKBULNm
SP - 98
EP - 116
VL - 19
IS - 1
DP - DeepDyve
ER -