TY - JOUR
AU - Conger, John J.
AB - EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT VoL. 1960 XX, Neo. 4. AN OBJECTIVE METHOD OF GROUPING PROFILES BY DISTANCE FUNCTIONS AND ITS RELATION TO FACTOR ANALYSIS 1 WILLIAM L. LEO AND JOHN J. CONGER SAWREY, KELLER, 2 of Colorado School of Medicine University A number of recent have been concerned with the investigations of what can be done with data which are in the form of problem have felt that the or profiles. Many investigators arrangement pat- tern of a can often be more than or profile meaningful any one, all, of the individual measures considered Such rea- profile separately. is for in the construction of for soning implicit, example, profiles and tests like the Rorschach and objective projective personality and for various measures of MMPI, intelligence, values, interests, and that a more useful in- aptitudes. Assuming profile may yield formation than each of the individual measures it we can contains, to a brief review of some of the in which have proceed ways profiles been used. the more which have been made Among elementary comparisons with data are the profile following: of Person 1 like that of Person 2 1. Is the over-all more profile or Person 3? 2. Is 
TI - An Objective Method of Grouping Profiles by Distance Functions and its Relation to Factor Analysis
JF - Educational and Psychological Measurement
DO - 10.1177/001316446002000402
DA - 1960-12-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/sage/an-objective-method-of-grouping-profiles-by-distance-functions-and-its-8avki5I7pv
SP - 651
EP - 673
VL - 20
IS - 4
DP - DeepDyve
ER -