TY - JOUR
AU - JOHNSON, DALE M.
AB - Rating of Educational and Psychological Journals TERRENCE S. LUCE and DALE M. JOHNSON The University ofTulsa The present study was designed to contrast to previous studies, which Procedure assess the "reputation" or prestige assessed only psychology journals. A list of 74 journals was compiled value of a sample of 74 journals in the In their attempt to assess journal from a modified list provided by Best fields of education and psychology. quality, Mace and Warner (1973) (1970), from the Koulack and Kessel­ The study attempts to provide a picture claim that present judgments about the man list, and from suggestions made of how journal ratings vary as a func­ reputation or prestige of professional by several College of Education fac­ tion of professional interest areas. journals are without empirical support. ulty members. The present authors de­ These areas correspond to the interest Their study selected 64 journals on the cided to use as their respondent sample areas of the American Educational Re­ basis of frequency of citation in members of the American Educational search Association and are as follows: Psychological Abstracts and/or be­ Research Association (AERA). While administration; curriculum and objec­ cause they were judged to be of sig­ 
TI - Rating of Educational and Psychological Journals
JF - Educational Researcher
DO - 10.3102/0013189X007010008
DA - 1978-11-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/sage/rating-of-educational-and-psychological-journals-ARlfR9DA0j
SP - 8
EP - 10
VL - 7
IS - 10
DP - DeepDyve
ER -