TY - JOUR
AU1 - Banks, George
AU2 - Rogelberg, Steven
AU3 - Woznyj, Haley
AU4 - Landis, Ronald
AU5 - Rupp, Deborah
AB - J Bus Psychol (2016) 31:323–338 DOI 10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7 EDITORIAL Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly 1 1 1 2 • • • • George C. Banks Steven G. Rogelberg Haley M. Woznyj Ronald S. Landis 3,4 Deborah E. Rupp Published online: 25 June 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Abstract a suboptimal rate, and that QRPs present a threat to the Purpose Questionable research or reporting practices viability of organizational science research. (QRPs) contribute to a growing concern regarding the credibility of research in the organizational sciences and Keywords Questionable research practices QRPs related fields. Such practices include design, analytic, or Research methodology  Philosophy of science  Ethics reporting practices that may introduce biased evidence, Research methods which can have harmful implications for evidence-based practice, theory development, and perceptions of the rigor of science. Introduction Design/Methodology/Approach To assess the extent to which QRPs are actually a concern, we conducted a sys- Concerns exist regarding the credibility of research in the tematic review to consider the evidence on QRPs. Using a social and natural sciences (Cortina 2015; Kepes and triangulation approach (e.g., by reviewing data from McDaniel 2013; Nosek et al. 2015; 
TI - Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
JF - Journal of Business and Psychology
DO - 10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7
DA - 2016-06-25
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/editorial-evidence-on-questionable-research-practices-the-good-the-bad-He5U0N6rkW
SP - 323
EP - 338
VL - 31
IS - 3
DP - DeepDyve
ER -