TY - JOUR
AU - Shrauger, Sid
AB -  1 This report is based on a dissertabon sribmitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the P h D degree at Duke University The author is particularly mdebted to his supervisor, John Altrocchi, and also to Michael A Wallach, Edward E Jones, Robert C Carson, Kurt Back, and Stephen C Jones for their suggestions dunng vanous stages of the development of this project This study was partially supported by funds from NIMH Grant MH-ii2i5, the Graduate School of Duke University, and the Veterans Administration Hospital, Durham, N C 2 Now at State Umversity of New York at Buffalo G>gnihve differentiation and impression formation and behavior m different phases of the impression-formation process The development of an impression of another person may be conceptualized as mvolvmg at least four different phases of information processmg (Shrauger & Altrocchi, 1964, Shrauger, 1965) These are (1) cue selection—selectmg the cues or specific behaviors which are attended to, (2) interpretive mference— drawmg mferences about more general traits lmphed by these cues, (3) extended mference—drawmg mferences about what additional traits a person might possess given the presence of some traits, (4) verbal report—the public expression of the impression formed In this study the 
TI - Cognitive differentiation and the impression‐formation process
JF - Journal of Personality
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01436.x
DA - 1967-01-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/wiley/cognitive-differentiation-and-the-impression-formation-process-I9HAJNimS5
SP - 402
EP - 414
VL - 35
IS - 3
DP - DeepDyve
ER -