TY - JOUR
AU - Jones, Thomas M.
AB - Thomas M. Jones Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefmed Perhaps its greatest virtue is that its adoption There are several reasons for the current con­ requires no extension of government. This cern with corporate social responsibility. In re­ alone enhances the appeal of corporate social cent years, the level of criticism of the business responsibility immensely. system has risen sharply. Not only has the per­ formance of business been called into question, Before corporate social responsibility is but so too have the power and privilege associ­ adopted on a wholesale basis, certain problems ated with large corporations. Some critics have need to be solved. First, the propriety of the even questioned the corporate system's ability to doctrine needs to be firmly established. Sec­ cope with future problems. 1,2 ond, provisions must be made for its imple­ mentation. Regardless of the substance of this criticism, it has frequently been accompanied by calls for This article is premised on the assertion that improved social control of business or, more the corporate social responsibility question can briefly, improved corporate governance. The be separated into two subsidiary questions, one apparent failure of several existing modes of dealing with the abstract concept, the other social 
TI - Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined
JF - California Management Review
DO - 10.2307/41164877
DA - 1980-04-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/sage/corporate-social-responsibility-revisited-redefined-JGD5G3qFd4
SP - 59
EP - 67
VL - 22
IS - 3
DP - DeepDyve
ER -