TY - JOUR
AU1 - Keeley, Thomas
AU2 - Al-Janabi, Hareth
AU3 - Lorgelly, Paula
AU4 - Coast, Joanna
AU5 - 
AB - Purpose: The ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L are two index measures appropriate for use in health research. Assessment of content validity allows understanding of whether a measure captures the most relevant and important aspects of a concept. This paper reports a qualitative assessment of the content validity and appropriateness for use of the eq-5D-5L and ICECAP-A measures, using novel methodology. Methods: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with research professionals in the UK and Australia. Informants were purposively sampled based on their professional role. Data were analysed in an iterative, thematic and constant comparative manner. A two stage investigation - the comparative direct approach - was developed to address the methodological challenges of the content validity research and allow rigorous assessment. Results: Informants viewed the ICECAP-A as an assessment of the broader determinants of quality of life, but lacking in assessment of health-related determinants. The eq-5D-5L was viewed as offering good coverage of health determinants, but as lacking in assessment of these broader determinants. Informants held some concerns about the content or wording of the Self-care, Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression items (EQ-5D-5L) and the Enjoyment, Achievement and attachment items (ICECAP-A). Conclusion: Using rigorous qualitative methodology the results suggest that the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L 
TI - A Qualitative Assessment of the Content Validity of the ICECAP-A and EQ-5D-5L and Their Appropriateness for Use in Health Research
JF - PLoS ONE
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0085287
DA - 2013-12-19
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/unpaywall/a-qualitative-assessment-of-the-content-validity-of-the-icecap-a-and-KYObbrStrz
DP - DeepDyve
ER -