TY - JOUR
AU - Slocombe, D.
AB - Currently popular concepts such as sustainable development and sustainability seek the integration of environment and development planning. However, there is little evidence that this integration is occurring in either mainstream development planning or environmental planning. This is a function of the history, philosophies, and evolved roles of both. A brief review of the experience and results of mainstream planning, environmental planning, and ecosystem science suggests there is much in past scientific and professional practice that is relevant to the goal of integrated planning for environment and development, but still such commonly recommended reforms as systems and multidisciplinary approaches, institutional integration, and participatory, goal-oriented processes are rarely achieved. “Ecosystem approaches,” as developed and applied in ecology, human ecology, environmental planning, anthropology, psychology, and other disciplines, may provide a more transdisciplinary route to successful integration of environment and development. Experience with ecosystem approaches is reviewed, their advantages and disadvantages are discussed, and they are compared to traditional urban and regional planning, environmental planning, and ecosystem science approaches. Ultimately a synthesis of desirable characteristics for a framework to integrate environment and development planning is presented as a guide for future work and a criterion for evaluating existing programs.
TI - Environmental planning, ecosystem science, and ecosystem approaches for integrating environment and development
JF - Environmental Management
DO - 10.1007/BF02394672
DA - 2006-04-05
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/environmental-planning-ecosystem-science-and-ecosystem-approaches-for-MF0FG8lcb1
SP - 289
EP - 303
VL - 17
IS - 3
DP - DeepDyve
ER -