TY - JOUR
AU - Stinchfield, Randy
AB - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to measure the reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. METHOD: Participants in this study were drawn from two sources: 803 men and women from the general adult population of Minnesota and 259 men and women who were admitted to a gambling treatment program. A 19-item measure of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling was administered, along with other validity measures. RESULTS: The DSM-IV diagnostic criteria were found to be reliable and valid. With a standard cutoff score of 5, DSM-IV criteria yielded satisfactory classification accuracy results; however, a cutoff score of 4 made modest improvements in classification accuracy and, most important, reduced the rate of false negatives. CONCLUSIONS: The DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling, when operationalized into questions, demonstrated satisfactory reliability, validity, and classification accuracy, and a cutoff score of 4 improved diagnostic precision.
TI - Reliability, Validity, and Classification Accuracy of a Measure of DSM-IV Diagnostic Criteria for Pathological Gambling
JF - American Journal of Psychiatry
DO - 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.180
DA - 2003-01-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/american-psychiatric-publishing-inc-journal/reliability-validity-and-classification-accuracy-of-a-measure-of-dsm-MWP0IiTL9C
SP - 180
VL - 160
IS - 1
DP - DeepDyve
ER -