TY - JOUR
AU1 - Campbell, Julie
AU2 - Palmer, Andrew
AU3 - Venn, Alison
AU4 - Sharman, Melanie
AU5 - Otahal, Petr
AU6 - Neil, Amanda
AB - Patient (2016) 9:311–322 DOI 10.1007/s40271-015-0157-5 OR IGINAL RESEARCH ARTIC L E A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Bariatric Surgery 1 1 1 1 • • • • Julie A. Campbell Andrew J. Palmer Alison Venn Melanie Sharman 1 1 Petr Otahal Amanda Neil Published online: 3 February 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 Abstract AQoL-8D utility value was 0.76 (0.17) and median 0.81 Background Psychosocial health status is an important (IQR 0.63–0.88). Spearman’s rank was r = 0.68; and dynamic outcome for bariatric/metabolic surgery (p\ 0.001); however, Bland–Altman analysis revealed patients, as acknowledged in recent international stan- fundamental differences. Neither instrument gave rise to dardised outcomes reporting guidelines. Multi-attribute floor effects. A ceiling effect was observed with the EQ- utility-instruments (MAUIs) capture and assess an indi- 5D-5L, with 36 % of participants obtaining a utility value vidual’s health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) within a of 1.00 (perfect health). These same participants obtained a single valuation, their utility. Neither MAUIs nor utilities mean utility of 0.87 on the AQoL-8D, primarily driven by were discussed in the guidelines. Many MAUIs (e.g. EQ- the mental-super-dimension score (0.52). 5D) target physical health. Not so 
TI - A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Bariatric Surgery
JF - The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
DO - 10.1007/s40271-015-0157-5
DA - 2016-02-03
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/a-head-to-head-comparison-of-the-eq-5d-5l-and-aqol-8d-multi-attribute-OM0HDPBj2E
SP - 311
EP - 322
VL - 9
IS - 4
DP - DeepDyve
ER -