TY - JOUR
AU - 
AB - 34 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY, VOL. 1, NO. 1, MARCH 2020 Responsible AI—Two Frameworks for Ethical Design Practice Dorian Peters, Karina Vold , Diana Robinson, and Rafael A. Calvo, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract—In 2019, the IEEE launched the P7000 standards technologies [3]. Moreover, many governments and interna- projects intended to address ethical issues in the design of tional organizations have released sets of ethical principles, autonomous and intelligent systems. This move came amidst including the OECD Principles in 2019 [4], the Montreal a growing public concern over the unintended consequences of Declaration in 2017 [5], the U.K. House of Lords report artificial intelligence (AI), compounded by the lack of an anticipa- “AI in the U.K.: ready willing and able?” in 2018 [6], the tory process for attending to ethical impact within professional practice. However, the difficulty in moving from principles to European Commission High-Level Expert Group (HLEG) on practice presents a significant challenge to the implementation of AI in 2018 [7], and the Beijing AI Principles in 2019 [8]. ethical guidelines. Herein, we describe two complementary frame- Indeed, recent reports indicate that there are currently more works for integrating ethical analysis into engineering practice than 70 publicly 
TI - Responsible AI—Two Frameworks for Ethical Design Practice
JF - IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society
DO - 10.1109/tts.2020.2974991
DA - 2020-03-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/unpaywall/responsible-ai-two-frameworks-for-ethical-design-practice-OMRQYoVj3i
DP - DeepDyve
ER -