TY - JOUR
AU - King, Mike
AB - Editorial come with trade- offs. For instance, those who struggle to articulate a point in writing may find that to be part of a process that leads to a new insight. Hazem Zohny , John McMillan , Mike King Perhaps generative AI runs the risk of making that part of the writing process Artificial intelligence (AI) and its intro- or originality of a quality ethics article, too easy and lead to missing out on duction into clinical pathways presents but it may be a matter of time before opportunities for insight. While that an array of ethical issues that are being they pass a medical ethics version of the seems like a valid worry, it might be 1–7 discussed in the JME. The develop- Turing test. that this is analogous to the changes ment of AI technologies that can produce While those who rely on more in writing that resulted from journals text that will pass plagiarism detectors analytic approaches to ethics might view being readily available online. Those of and are capable of appearing to be this as an ethical apocalypse, there are us who are old enough to recall writing written by a human author present new 
TI - Ethics of generative AI
JF - Journal of Medical Ethics
DO - 10.1136/jme-2023-108909
DA - 2023-02-24
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/british-medical-journal/ethics-of-generative-ai-VGwa3bjCVf
SP - 79
EP - 80
VL - 49
IS - 2
DP - DeepDyve
ER -