TY - JOUR
AU - Have, Henk ten
AB - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10136-0 EDITORIAL 1 2,3 Bert Gordijn  · Henk ten Have © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023 In the last few years large language models (LLMs) have example. It can also be repetitive, recycling phrases from inspired an increasingly sophisticated academic debate previous answers in a slightly annoying manner. Neverthe- about their ethical implications (see e.g., Weidinger et al. less, it is hard to suppress a feeling of awe when engaging 2021). With OpenAI’s release of ChatGPT, on November with the chatbot for the first time. 30th, 2022, this discussion has now moved mainstream. The new chatbot was released by way of research preview “… to get users’ feedback and learn about its strengths and weak- Questions nesses” (OpenAI, 2022). In the following week more than a million users tried out the new chatbot (Vallance, 2022). Soon after the release of the new chatbot, all kinds of ques- The authors of this editorial could not resist the temptation tions about its implications were raised. How is this technol- either. So, we asked ChatGPT to write a column about con- ogy going to affect the role of essay assignments in academic temporary Greece 
TI - ChatGPT: evolution or revolution?
JF - Medicine Health Care and Philosophy
DO - 10.1007/s11019-023-10136-0
DA - 2023-03-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/chatgpt-evolution-or-revolution-Z061lSrHLA
SP - 1
EP - 2
VL - 26
IS - 1
DP - DeepDyve
ER -