TY - JOUR
AU1 - Leung, Patrick W.L.
AU2 - Kwong, S.L.
AU3 - Tang, C.P.
AU4 - Ho, T.P.
AU5 - Hung, S.F.
AU6 - Lee, C.C.
AU7 - Hong, S.L.
AU8 - Chiu, C.M.
AU9 - Liu, W.S.
AB - Background: Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR were understudied. This study aimed at examining their test–retest reliability and criterion validity. Methods: Three Chinese community and clinic samples were recruited in Hong Kong. The parents, teachers, and youths respectively completed the CBCL, TRF, and YSR. Results: The Chinese CBCL, TRF, and YSR were test–retest reliable and valid. However, there was score/case attenuation at retest. CBCL and TRF appeared to screen externalizing and ADHD problems better, while YSR screened internalizing problems better. Conclusions: Clinicians should be cautious about score/case attenuation at retest while using CBCL, TRF, and YSR to chart patients’ progress. They should also recognize their different strengths in screening various disorders.
TI - Test–retest reliability and criterion validity of the Chinese version of CBCL, TRF, and YSR
JF - The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
DO - 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01570.x
DA - 2006-09-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/wiley/test-retest-reliability-and-criterion-validity-of-the-chinese-version-bJJji0APWa
SP - 970
VL - 47
IS - 9
DP - DeepDyve
ER -