TY - JOUR
AU - Blaivas, M.
AB - Crit Ultrasound J (2010) 2:93–95 DOI 10.1007/s13089-010-0050-3 EDITORIAL Development of evidence-based clinical recommendations and consensus statements in critical ultrasound field: why and how? • • M. Elbarbary Lawrence A. Melniker • • • Giovanni Volpicelli Luca Neri T. Petrovic E. Storti M. Blaivas Published online: 2 December 2010 Springer-Verlag 2010 While ultrasound (US) has been used in medicine for Why we need critical US evidence-based clinical several decades, its use in critical care and emergency recommendations (CR) and consensus statements (CS)? medicine is relatively new. Clinician-performed ultra- sound brings an essential imaging capability to the point- Numerous new challenges have emerged with the appear- of-care in a manner that represents a true paradigm shift ance of ‘‘Critical Ultrasound’’, but one can recognize eight in the art and science of physical examination and diag- major domains. The first challenging domain may be def- nosis. The performance of ultrasound by clinicians in inition and nomenclature. One can find several names or critical settings, ‘‘Critical Ultrasound’’, has created new terms for a single sign such as the B-lines that were also challenges that must be addressed by the medical called comet tail artifacts ultrasound lung comets, multiple community. B-line pattern, indicated as 
TI - Development of evidence-based clinical recommendations and consensus statements in critical ultrasound field: why and how?
JF - Critical Ultrasound Journal
DO - 10.1007/s13089-010-0050-3
DA - 2010-12-02
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/springer-journals/development-of-evidence-based-clinical-recommendations-and-consensus-fEwwRFHjsZ
SP - 93
EP - 95
VL - 2
IS - 3
DP - DeepDyve
ER -