TY - JOUR
AU - Peters, John C.
AB - March 2001: (ll)S63-S65 James 0. Hill, Ph.D., Center for Human Nutrition, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO; Jeanne P. Goldberg, Ph.D., R.D., Center on Nutrition Communication, School ofNutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA; Russell R. Pate, Ph.D., School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC; John C. Peters, Ph.D., The Procter & Gamble Co., Nutrition Science Institute, Cincinnati, OH. It is our pleasure to provide a summation of the Summit. explore some possibilities. First we would like to thank everyone for participating in Let’s start with defining the “crisis.” We heard the breakout groups. Your experience in this activity dem- throughout the Summit that we have a “crisis.” But what onstrates that the issues are indeed complex. No simple exactly is this crisis? This is not a trivial issue. If we define solution exists. No one answer can be found. Even when it wrong we might do more harm than good. We need to groups worked on the same situation, a variety of ap- get the wording and messages right. What is the “banner” proaches and decisions resulted. As we look over the past that we’re going to go forward under? How do 
TI - Summary
JF - Nutrition Reviews
DO - 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2001.tb06987.x
DA - 2001-03-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/oxford-university-press/summary-q0e0Iltsk5
SP - S63
EP - S65
VL - 59
IS - 3
DP - DeepDyve
ER -