TY - JOUR
AU1 - Swerdlik, Mark E.
AU2 - Wilson, Frederick Robert
AB - REFERENCES standardization populations are complex and transcend the area of psychometrics. We feel that Chalfant, J.C., Scheffelin, M.A. (Eds.), Central Processing whenever the WISC-R or other tests are used Dysfunctions in Children: A Review of Research, Phase 3. with minority children in clinical practice, it is es- (NI-NDS Monograph No. 9). Washington, D.C.: U.S. sential for examiners to use prudence and insight Government Printing Office, 1969. Doppelt, J.E., Kaufman, A.S., Estimation of the differences in their interpretation of the scores. between WISC-R and WISC IQs. Educational and Psy- chological Measurement, 1977, 37, 417-424. Hamm, H., Wheeler, J., McCallum, S., Herrin, M., Hunter, D., ABOUT THE AUTHORS Catoe, C, A comparison between the WISC and WISC-R among educable mentally retarded students. Psychology in Sondra G. Weiner is a doctoral candidate at New York the Schools, 1976,13, 4-8. University, specializing in developmental disabilities, and is a Kaufman, A.S., A new approach to the interpretation of test teaching supervisor for the Department of Special Education scatter on the WISC-R. Journal of Learning Disabilities, at the College of the City of New York. She returned to school 1976, 9,160-168. (a) after raising four children. She had a research assistantship at Kaufman, A.S., Verbal-Performance 
TI - A Comparison of WISC and WISC-R Subtest Scatter
JF - Journal of Learning Disabilities
DO - 10.1177/002221947901200209
DA - 1979-02-01
UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/sage/a-comparison-of-wisc-and-wisc-r-subtest-scatter-zFB0BHgYqJ
SP - 105
EP - 107
VL - 12
IS - 2
DP - DeepDyve
ER -