Rubber‐modified epoxies. II. Influence of the cure schedule and rubber concentration on the generated morphology
Rubber‐modified epoxies. II. Influence of the cure schedule and rubber concentration on the...
Verchere, D.; Pascault, J. P.; Sautereau, H.; Moschiar, S. M.; Riccardi, C. C.; Williams, R. J. J.
1991-02-05 00:00:00
The morphology of a system consisting of a bisphenol A diglycidylether (DGEBA) based epoxy, cured with a cycloaliphatic diamine (4,4′‐diamino‐3,3′‐dimethyldicyclohexylmethane, 3DCM), in the presence of an epoxy‐terminated butadience‐acrylonitrile random copolymer (ETBN), was studied as a function of the cure schedule and the initial rubber concentration. Scanning (SEM) and transmission (TEM) electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and dynamic mechanical analysis were used to characterize the generated morphology. SEM results were not affected by the type of mechanical test and strain rate. Trends observed for the particle size distribution, the volume fraction of dispersed phase, the concentration of dispersed phase particles and the composition of both phases as a function of polymerization temperature and rubber concentration, were discussed. A correlation between the viscosity at the cloud point and the average size of dispersed phase particles was found for different systems, independently of the cure temperature and the initial rubber amount.
http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.pngJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceWileyhttp://www.deepdyve.com/lp/wiley/rubber-modified-epoxies-ii-influence-of-the-cure-schedule-and-rubber-005xiFq643
Rubber‐modified epoxies. II. Influence of the cure schedule and rubber concentration on the generated morphology
The morphology of a system consisting of a bisphenol A diglycidylether (DGEBA) based epoxy, cured with a cycloaliphatic diamine (4,4′‐diamino‐3,3′‐dimethyldicyclohexylmethane, 3DCM), in the presence of an epoxy‐terminated butadience‐acrylonitrile random copolymer (ETBN), was studied as a function of the cure schedule and the initial rubber concentration. Scanning (SEM) and transmission (TEM) electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and dynamic mechanical analysis were used to characterize the generated morphology. SEM results were not affected by the type of mechanical test and strain rate. Trends observed for the particle size distribution, the volume fraction of dispersed phase, the concentration of dispersed phase particles and the composition of both phases as a function of polymerization temperature and rubber concentration, were discussed. A correlation between the viscosity at the cloud point and the average size of dispersed phase particles was found for different systems, independently of the cure temperature and the initial rubber amount.
To get new article updates from a journal on your personalized homepage, please log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.