Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A comparison of methods for estimating juvenile salmon habitat capacity to assist with restoration planning and evaluation

A comparison of methods for estimating juvenile salmon habitat capacity to assist with... INTRODUCTIONDespite investments of hundreds of millions of dollars annually for more than 20 years to restore freshwater habitat and maximize freshwater production of Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. populations along the West Coast, we still struggle to identify restoration actions within a watershed that will address limiting factors and lead to an increase in habitat capacity and salmon survival. Numerous assessment methods have been developed to identify degraded floodplain, riparian, and instream habitat (Beechie et al. 2013; Roni et al. 2018). Although remote sensing and new analytical techniques have allowed more rapid mapping and assessment of floodplain, riparian, and riverine habitat (Beechie and Imaki 2014; Macfarlane et al. 2017a, 2017b; Bond et al. 2018), reliable methods to adequately quantify historic, current, and potential salmonid abundance at the reach, tributary, and watershed scales have proven more challenging. The scale of watershed restoration and the cost and logistical constraints of measuring fish habitat capacity, current abundance, or survival at both a reach scale and a watershed scale have hampered these efforts. Therefore, a variety of modeling approaches has been developed in recent years to estimate these metrics for salmonids to assist with planning and evaluating habitat restoration.Estimating habitat capacity—the maximum number of fish that a given length or http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Transactions of the American Fisheries Society Oxford University Press

A comparison of methods for estimating juvenile salmon habitat capacity to assist with restoration planning and evaluation

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/a-comparison-of-methods-for-estimating-juvenile-salmon-habitat-060qJ6GDR7

References (53)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© 2023 American Fisheries Society
ISSN
0002-8487
eISSN
1548-8659
DOI
10.1002/tafs.10399
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONDespite investments of hundreds of millions of dollars annually for more than 20 years to restore freshwater habitat and maximize freshwater production of Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp. populations along the West Coast, we still struggle to identify restoration actions within a watershed that will address limiting factors and lead to an increase in habitat capacity and salmon survival. Numerous assessment methods have been developed to identify degraded floodplain, riparian, and instream habitat (Beechie et al. 2013; Roni et al. 2018). Although remote sensing and new analytical techniques have allowed more rapid mapping and assessment of floodplain, riparian, and riverine habitat (Beechie and Imaki 2014; Macfarlane et al. 2017a, 2017b; Bond et al. 2018), reliable methods to adequately quantify historic, current, and potential salmonid abundance at the reach, tributary, and watershed scales have proven more challenging. The scale of watershed restoration and the cost and logistical constraints of measuring fish habitat capacity, current abundance, or survival at both a reach scale and a watershed scale have hampered these efforts. Therefore, a variety of modeling approaches has been developed in recent years to estimate these metrics for salmonids to assist with planning and evaluating habitat restoration.Estimating habitat capacity—the maximum number of fish that a given length or

Journal

Transactions of the American Fisheries SocietyOxford University Press

Published: Mar 1, 2023

Keywords: capacity; Chinook Salmon; ecology; habitat; management; riparian and stream

There are no references for this article.