Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Estimation and Testing of the Union Wage Effect Using Panel Data

Estimation and Testing of the Union Wage Effect Using Panel Data Abstract We present estimates of the union wage effect controlling for unmeasured individual effects, and subject the conventional fixed-effects model to specification tests. For PSID men the union wage effect is 5-8% after controlling for person effects, as opposed to 20% in cross-section. Omnibus tests based on an unrestricted reduced form and instrumental variables tests based on differencing are consistent with conventional models. Tests based on comparing those who enter and leave union coverage provide evidence against the usual model. We find evidence for interactions between union status and other variables even after controlling for person effects. This content is only available as a PDF. © 1991 The Review of Economic Studies Limited http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Review of Economic Studies Oxford University Press

Estimation and Testing of the Union Wage Effect Using Panel Data

The Review of Economic Studies , Volume 58 (5) – Oct 1, 1991

 
/lp/oxford-university-press/estimation-and-testing-of-the-union-wage-effect-using-panel-data-0GVzaUI1s0

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© 1991 The Review of Economic Studies Limited
ISSN
0034-6527
eISSN
1467-937X
DOI
10.2307/2297947
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract We present estimates of the union wage effect controlling for unmeasured individual effects, and subject the conventional fixed-effects model to specification tests. For PSID men the union wage effect is 5-8% after controlling for person effects, as opposed to 20% in cross-section. Omnibus tests based on an unrestricted reduced form and instrumental variables tests based on differencing are consistent with conventional models. Tests based on comparing those who enter and leave union coverage provide evidence against the usual model. We find evidence for interactions between union status and other variables even after controlling for person effects. This content is only available as a PDF. © 1991 The Review of Economic Studies Limited

Journal

The Review of Economic StudiesOxford University Press

Published: Oct 1, 1991

There are no references for this article.