Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
CC Chang, CJ Lin (2011)
LIBSVM: a library for support vector machinesACM Trans Intell Syst Technol, 2
N Sebanz, H Bekkering, G Knoblich (2006)
Joint action: bodies and minds moving togetherTrends Cogn Sci, 10
SR Ke, HLU Thuc, YJ Lee, JN Hwang, JH Yoo, KH Choi (2013)
A review on video-based human activity recognitionComputers, 2
OD Lara, MA Labrador (2013)
A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensorsIEEE Commun Surv Tutor, 15
M Hall, G Holmes (2003)
Benchmarking attribute selection techniques for discrete class data miningIEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng, 15
M Hall, E Frank, G Holmes, B Pfahringer, P Reutemann, IH Witten (2009)
The WEKA data mining software: an updateSIGKDD Explor Newsl, 11
R Quinlan (1993)
C4.5: programs for machine learning
JI Figueroa-Angulo, J Savage, E Bribiesca, B Escalante, LE Sucar (2015)
Compound hidden Markov model for activity labellingInt J Intell Sci, 5
A Koller, RPA Petrick (2011)
Experiences with planning for natural language generationComput Intell, 27
K Dautenhahn (2007)
Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interactionPhilos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci, 362
D Aha, D Kibler (1991)
Instance-based learning algorithmsMach Learn, 6
C Breazeal (2005)
Socially intelligent robotsInteractions, 12
R Baayen, D Davidson, D Bates (2008)
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and itemsJ Mem Lang, 59
S Cessie, J Houwelingen (1992)
Ridge estimators in logistic regressionAppl Stat, 41
DO Johnson, RH Cuijpers, JF Juola, E Torta, M Simonov, A Frisiello, M Bazzani, W Yan, C Weber, S Wermter (2014)
Socially assistive robots: a comprehensive approach to extending independent livingInt J Soc Robot, 6
S Loth, K Huth, JP Ruiter (2013)
Automatic detection of service initiation signals used in barsFront Psychol
R Kohavi, GH John (1997)
Wrappers for feature subset selectionArtif Intell, 97
D Bohus, E Horvitz (2009)
Learning to predict engagement with a spoken dialog system in open-world settingsProc SIGDIAL, 2009
JK Aggarwal, L Xia (2014)
Human activity recognition from 3d data: a reviewPattern Recognit Lett, 48
B West, KB Welch, AT Galecki (2006)
Linear mixed models: a practical guide using statistical software
LF Chen, ZT Liu, M Wu, M Ding, FY Dong, K Hirota (2015)
Emotion–age–gender–nationality based intention understanding in human–robot interaction using two-layer fuzzy support vector regressionInt J Soc Robot, 7
M White (2006)
Efficient realization of coordinate structures in Combinatory Categorial GrammarRes Lang Comput, 4
C Zhu, RH Byrd, P Lu, J Nocedal (1997)
Algorithm 778: L-bfgs-b: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimizationACM Trans Math Softw (TOMS), 23
H Baltzakis, M Pateraki, P Trahanias (2012)
Visual tracking of hands, faces and facial features of multiple personsMach Vis Appl, 23
E Frank, Y Wang, S Inglis, G Holmes, I Witten (1998)
Using model trees for classificationMach Learn, 32
K Otsuka (2011)
Conversation scene analysisIEEE Signal Process Mag, 28
A robot agent designed to engage in real-world human–robot joint action must be able to understand the social states of the human users it interacts with in order to behave appropriately. In particular, in a dynamic public space, a crucial task for the robot is to determine the needs and intentions of all of the people in the scene, so that it only interacts with people who intend to interact with it. We address the task of estimating the engagement state of customers for a robot bartender based on the data from audiovisual sensors. We begin with an offline experiment using hidden Markov models, confirming that the sensor data contains the information necessary to estimate user state. We then present two strategies for online state estimation: a rule-based classifier based on observed human behaviour in real bars, and a set of supervised classifiers trained on a labelled corpus. These strategies are compared in offline cross-validation, in an online user study, and through validation against a separate test corpus. These studies show that while the trained classifiers are best in a cross-validation setting, the rule-based classifier performs best with novel data; however, all classifiers also change their estimate too frequently for practical use. To address this issue, we present a final classifier based on Conditional Random Fields: this model has comparable performance on the test data, with increased stability. In summary, though, the rule-based classifier shows competitive performance with the trained classifiers, suggesting that for this task, such a simple model could actually be a preferred option, providing useful online performance while avoiding the implementation and data-scarcity issues involved in using machine learning for this task.
International Journal of Social Robotics – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 20, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.