Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Conceptualization of Marital Commitment: An Integrative Analysis

The Conceptualization of Marital Commitment: An Integrative Analysis Although theoretical statements regarding the conceptualization of marital commitment abound in the literature, no research has attempted to compare these conceptualizations empirically. Six studies involving 1, 787 participants explored the conceptual structure of marital commitment through a variety of empirical methods. Results suggested the existence of 3 primary dimensions of marital commitment: an attraction component based on devotion, satisfaction, and love, a moral–normative component based on a sense of personal responsibility for maintaining the marriage and on the belief that marriage is an important social and religious institution, and a constraining component based on fear of the social, financial, and emotional costs of relationship termination. These factors most strongly resemble the three dimensions proposed by M. P. Johnson (1991)but also appear to represent the general features of interpersonal commitment described in most theoretical treatments of the construct and correspond well with couples’ personal accounts of what it feels like to be in a committed relationship. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Personality and Social Psychology American Psychological Association

The Conceptualization of Marital Commitment: An Integrative Analysis

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/the-conceptualization-of-marital-commitment-an-integrative-analysis-0r21c5RmJZ

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0022-3514
eISSN
1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1177
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Although theoretical statements regarding the conceptualization of marital commitment abound in the literature, no research has attempted to compare these conceptualizations empirically. Six studies involving 1, 787 participants explored the conceptual structure of marital commitment through a variety of empirical methods. Results suggested the existence of 3 primary dimensions of marital commitment: an attraction component based on devotion, satisfaction, and love, a moral–normative component based on a sense of personal responsibility for maintaining the marriage and on the belief that marriage is an important social and religious institution, and a constraining component based on fear of the social, financial, and emotional costs of relationship termination. These factors most strongly resemble the three dimensions proposed by M. P. Johnson (1991)but also appear to represent the general features of interpersonal commitment described in most theoretical treatments of the construct and correspond well with couples’ personal accounts of what it feels like to be in a committed relationship.

Journal

Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association

Published: May 1, 1997

There are no references for this article.