Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Levi, T. Carney (2009)
Crowding in Peripheral Vision: Why Bigger Is BetterCurrent Biology, 19
R. Fisher
014: On the "Probable Error" of a Coefficient of Correlation Deduced from a Small Sample.
Juan Chen, Yingchen He, Ziyun Zhu, Tiangang Zhou, Yujia Peng, Xilin Zhang, F. Fang (2014)
Attention-Dependent Early Cortical Suppression Contributes to CrowdingThe Journal of Neuroscience, 34
Marialuisa Martelli, N. Majaj, D. Pelli (2005)
Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts.Journal of vision, 5 1
P. Girard, Paul Salin, J. Bullier (1991)
Visual activity in macaque area V4 depends on area 17 input.Neuroreport, 2 2
A. Toet, D. Levi (1992)
The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafoveaVision Research, 32
G. Binsted, K. Brownell, Z. Vorontsova, M. Heath, D. Saucier (2007)
Visuomotor system uses target features unavailable to conscious awarenessProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104
Warrick Roseboom, Derek Arnold (2011)
Learning to reach for ‘invisible’ visual inputCurrent Biology, 21
Lawrence Sincich, Ken Park, Melville Wohlgemuth, J. Horton (2004)
Bypassing V1: a direct geniculate input to area MTNature Neuroscience, 7
Laura Parkes, J. Lund, A. Angelucci, J. Solomon, M. Morgan (2001)
Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human visionNature Neuroscience, 4
Sheng He, P. Cavanagh, J. Intriligator (1996)
Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awarenessNature, 383
Paul Bulakowski, R. Post, D. Whitney (2009)
Visuomotor Crowding: The Resolution of Grasping in Cluttered ScenesFrontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 3
H. Baseler, A. Morland, B. Wandell (1999)
Topographic Organization of Human Visual Areas in the Absence of Input from Primary CortexThe Journal of Neuroscience, 19
P. Girard, Paul Salin, J. Bullier (1991)
Visual activity in areas V3a and V3 during reversible inactivation of area V1 in the macaque monkey.Journal of neurophysiology, 66 5
T. Ganel, M. Goodale (2003)
Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shapeNature, 426
Dimitris Voudouris, J. Smeets, E. Brenner (2012)
Do obstacles affect the selection of grasping points?Human movement science, 31 5
A. Haffenden, M. Goodale (1998)
The Effect of Pictorial Illusion on Prehension and PerceptionJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10
M. Goodale (2011)
Transforming vision into actionVision Research, 51
C. Rocha-Miranda, D. Bender, C. Gross, M. Mishkin (1975)
Visual activation of neurons in inferotemporal cortex depends on striate cortex and forebrain commissures.Journal of neurophysiology, 38 3
D. Pelli, M. Palomares, N. Majaj (2004)
Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection.Journal of vision, 4 12
A. Kaszniak, D. Chalmers, A. Milner, M. Goodale (1995)
The visual brain in action
M. Masson (2003)
Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation.Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale, 57 3
D. Levi (2008)
Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-reviewVision Research, 48
P. Girard, J. Bullier (1989)
Visual activity in area V2 during reversible inactivation of area 17 in the macaque monkey.Journal of neurophysiology, 62 6
Craig Chapman, J. Gallivan, J. Culham, M. Goodale (2011)
Mental blocks: fMRI reveals top-down modulation of early visual cortex when obstacles interfere with grasp planningNeuropsychologia, 49
C. Galletti, P. Fattori, D. Kutz, M. Gamberini (1999)
Brain location and visual topography of cortical area V6A in the macaque monkeyEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 11
Tingting Liu, Yi Jiang, Xinghuai Sun, Sheng He (2009)
Reduction of the Crowding Effect in Spatially Adjacent but Cortically Remote Visual StimuliCurrent Biology, 19
R. Fisher (1915)
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF THE VALUES OF THE CORRELATION COEFFIENTS IN SAMPLES FROM AN INDEFINITELY LARGE POPU;ATIONBiometrika, 10
D. Levi, S. Klein, A. Aitsebaomo (1985)
Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnificationVision Research, 25
T. Ganel, M. Tanzer, M. Goodale (2008)
A Double Dissociation Between Action and Perception in the Context of Visual IllusionsPsychological Science, 19
R. Malach, I. Levy, U. Hasson (2002)
The topography of high-order human object areasTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 6
F. Fang, Sheng He (2005)
Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathwaysNature Neuroscience, 8
D. Whitney, D. Levi (2011)
Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognitionTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 15
M. Goodale, A. Milner (1992)
Separate visual pathways for perception and actionTrends in Neurosciences, 15
C. Colby, R. Gattass, C. Olson, C. Gross (1988)
Topographical organization of cortical afferents to extrastriate visual area PO in the macaque: A dual tracer studyJournal of Comparative Neurology, 269
S. Pitzalis, C. Galletti, Ruey-Song Huang, F. Patria, G. Committeri, G. Galati, P. Fattori, M. Sereno (2006)
Wide-Field Retinotopy Defines Human Cortical Visual Area V6The Journal of Neuroscience, 26
M. Jeannerod (1986)
Mechanisms of visuomotor coordination: A study in normal and brain-damaged subjectsNeuropsychologia, 24
C. Galletti, D. Kutz, M. Gamberini, R. Breveglieri, P. Fattori (2003)
Role of the medial parieto-occipital cortex in the control of reaching and grasping movementsExperimental Brain Research, 153
P. Fattori, R. Breveglieri, K. Amoroso, C. Galletti (2004)
Evidence for both reaching and grasping activity in the medial parieto‐occipital cortex of the macaqueEuropean Journal of Neuroscience, 20
S. Aglioti, J. DeSouza, M. Goodale (1995)
Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the handCurrent Biology, 5
Objects rarely appear in isolation in natural scenes. Although many studies have investigated how nearby objects influence perception in cluttered scenes (i.e., crowding), none has studied how nearby objects influence visually guided action. In Experiment 1, we found that participants could scale their grasp to the size of a crowded target even when they could not perceive its size, demonstrating for the first time that neurologically intact participants can use visual information that is not available to conscious report to scale their grasp to real objects in real scenes. In Experiments 2 and 3, we found that changing the eccentricity of the display and the orientation of the flankers had no effect on grasping but strongly affected perception. The differential effects of eccentricity and flanker orientation on perception and grasping show that the known differences in retinotopy between the ventral and dorsal streams are reflected in the way in which people deal with targets in cluttered scenes.
Psychological Science – SAGE
Published: Jan 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.