Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Kanfer, J. Phillips (1970)
Learning foundations of behavior therapy
A. Tversky (1969)
Intransitivity of preferences.Psychological Review, 76
Logan Logan (1965)
Decision making by rats: Delay versus amount of rewardJournal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 59
W. Mischel, E. Ebbesen (1970)
Attention in delay of gratification.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16
A. Catania (1963)
Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 6
R. Herrnstein (1958)
SECTION OF PSYCHOLOGY: SOME FACTORS INFLUENCING BEHAVIOR IN A TWO‐RESPONSE SITUATION*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 21
Shin-Ho Chung (1965)
Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 8 6
W. Mischel (1966)
Theory and research on the antecedents of self-imposed delay of reward.Progress in experimental personality research, 3
N. Azrin, J. Powell (1968)
Behavioral engineering: the reduction of smoking behavior by a conditioning apparatus and procedure.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1 3
H. Rachlin (1970)
Introduction to modern behaviorism
R. Herrnstein (1970)
On the law of effect.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 13 2
B. Skinner, Mary Woolley (1953)
Science and human behavior
Renner Ke (1967)
Temporal integration: an incentive approach to conflict resolution., 4
E. Fantino (1969)
Choice and rate of reinforcement.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 12 5
Herrnstein Herrnstein (1958)
Some factors influencing behavior in a two‐response situationTransactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 21
A. Catania (1963)
Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 6
Frank Logan (1965)
DECISION MAKING BY RATS: UNCERTAIN OUTCOME CHOICES.Journal of comparative and physiological psychology, 59
W. Baum, H. Rachlin, H. Rachlin (1969)
Choice as time allocation.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 12 6
When offered a choice (Choice Y) between a small immediate reward (2‐sec exposure to grain) and a large reward (4‐sec exposure to grain) delayed by 4 sec, pigeons invariably preferred the small, immediate reward. However, when offered a choice (Choice X) between a delay of T seconds followed by Choice Y and a delay of T seconds followed by restriction to the large delayed reward only, the pigeon's choice depended on T. When T was small, the pigeons chose the alternative leading to Choice Y (and then chose the small, immediate reward). When T was large, the pigeons chose the alternative leading to the large delayed reward only. The reversal of preference as T increases is predicted by several recent models for choice between various amounts and delays of reward. The preference for the large delayed alternative with long durations of T parallels everyday instances of advance commitment to a given course of action. Such commitment may be seen as a prototype for self‐control.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 1972
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.