Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Book Review: Urbanization and Social Welfare in China

Book Review: Urbanization and Social Welfare in China China Information XX (2) 066503-521 Book Revs 29/6/06 2:56 pm Page 318 example of her work with sociolegal tools. Once again, I thought her treat- ment of the problem an excellent introduction that should benefit both stu- dents of Chinese law interested in learning more about sociolegal methodology and those whose work is grounded in Western legal traditions who are interested in comparative study. In the end, my only serious quarrel with the book is that it could have done more. I would have been fascinated, for example, by an extended consideration of the linguistic history that ren- dered xianfa “constitution.” Why xianfa? Why not guofa? Why not something else closer to “basic law,” in the sense that basic = fundamental? I realize, of course, that the factors that lead one word to take on a particular legal or political meaning are part of complex linguistic processes, rather than simple choices. Both Cao and Stephen Angle have done excellent jobs in illuminat- ing these processes in their consideration of the way quanli came to be equat- ed with “rights.” But the fact remains, those processes and their results matter linguistically and legally, and it would have been elucidating to http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png China Information: A Journal on Contemporary China Studies SAGE

Book Review: Urbanization and Social Welfare in China

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/book-review-urbanization-and-social-welfare-in-china-3c01AFfhKq

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
Copyright © by SAGE Publications
ISSN
0920-203X
eISSN
1741-590X
DOI
10.1177/0920203X06066506
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

China Information XX (2) 066503-521 Book Revs 29/6/06 2:56 pm Page 318 example of her work with sociolegal tools. Once again, I thought her treat- ment of the problem an excellent introduction that should benefit both stu- dents of Chinese law interested in learning more about sociolegal methodology and those whose work is grounded in Western legal traditions who are interested in comparative study. In the end, my only serious quarrel with the book is that it could have done more. I would have been fascinated, for example, by an extended consideration of the linguistic history that ren- dered xianfa “constitution.” Why xianfa? Why not guofa? Why not something else closer to “basic law,” in the sense that basic = fundamental? I realize, of course, that the factors that lead one word to take on a particular legal or political meaning are part of complex linguistic processes, rather than simple choices. Both Cao and Stephen Angle have done excellent jobs in illuminat- ing these processes in their consideration of the way quanli came to be equat- ed with “rights.” But the fact remains, those processes and their results matter linguistically and legally, and it would have been elucidating to

Journal

China Information: A Journal on Contemporary China StudiesSAGE

Published: Jul 1, 2006

There are no references for this article.