Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ned Crosby (1986)
Citizen Panels: A New Approach to Citizen Participation.Public Administration Review, 46
Lyn Kathlene, John Martin (1991)
Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives, and policy formationJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10
James Fishkin (1995)
The Voice of the People
J. Dryzek (1992)
Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science
E. Dionne (1991)
Why Americans Hate Politics
H. Frederickson (1982)
The Recovery of Civism in Public Administration.Liberal Education, 68
R. Reich (1989)
The Power of Public IdeasAmerican Political Science Review, 83
R. Durant (1995)
The Democratic Deficit in AmericaPolitical Science Quarterly, 110
R. Dahl (2008)
The Problem of Civic CompetenceJournal of Democracy, 3
N. Dodd, J. Habermas, Stephen White (1997)
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy@@@The Cambridge Companion to HabermasBritish Journal of Sociology, 48
Ortwin Renn, T. Webler, Horst Rakel, P. Dienel, B. Johnson (1993)
Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedurePolicy Sciences, 26
A. Gutmann, D. Thompson (1996)
Democracy and Disagreement
W. Greider (1992)
Who Will Tell the People: The Betrayal of American Democracy
E. Weeks (1992)
Citizen Participation in Policy Formation: A Review of Governor Roberts' Conversation with Oregon.
J. Nagel (1992)
Combining deliberation and fair representation in community health decisions.University of Pennsylvania law review, 140 5
C. Coglianese (1990)
Democracy and Its CriticsMichigan Law Review, 88
Jane Mansbridge (1980)
Beyond Adversary Democracy
The goal of deliberative democracy is to revitalize civic culture, improve the nature of public discourse, and generate the political will necessary to take effective action on pressing problems. While there exists a fairly substantial amount of literature on the desired features of a deliberative democracy, there is little empirical research on the practical feasibility of convening a large‐scale public deliberative process. This article describes a model of deliberative democracy which offers a practical opportunity for all citizens to participate, provides citizens extensive information about the nature of the policy problem, engages citizens in the same problem‐solving context as elected officials, and uses rigorous methods. The practical feasibility of this model is assessed through four large‐scale implementations, each addressing controversial and politically charged issues in cities ranging in population from 100,000 to 400,000. The conclusion from these trials is that it is possible to convene a large‐scale public deliberative process that enables local governments to take effective action on previously intractable issues.
Public Administration Review – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.