Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
ABSTRACT Hyperspectral Raman images of mineral components of trabecular and cortical bone at 3 m spatial resolution are presented. Contrast is generated from Raman spectra acquired over the 600â1400 cmâ1 Raman shift range. Factor analysis on the ensemble of Raman spectra is used to generate descriptors of mineral components. In trabecular bone independent phosphate (POâ3) and monohydrogen phosphate (HPOâ2) factors are 4 4 observed. Phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate gradients extend from trabecular packets into the interior of a rod. The gradients are sharply deï¬ned in newly regenerated bone. There, HPOâ2 content maximizes 4 near a trabecular packet and decreases to a minimum value over as little as a 20 m distance. Incomplete mineralization is clearly visible. In cortical bone, factor analysis yields only a single mineral factor containing both POâ3 and HPOâ2 signatures and this implies uniform distribution of these ions in the region imaged. 4 4 Uniform POâ3 and HPOâ2 distribution is veriï¬ed by spectral band integration. © 1999 Society of Photo-Optical Instru4 4 mentation Engineers. [S1083-3668(99)00301-9] Keywords Raman imaging; cortical bone; trabecular bone; microscopy. 1 INTRODUCTION Bone formation is not a single process, but a collection of distinct pathways to synthesize calciï¬ed tissues.1 In developing embryos, the process includes the proliferation and commitment of mesenchymal cells to the skeletal lineage; the patterning of anlage, which is associated with progenitor cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation; and the growth and remodeling of skeletal tissues into a mature form. In postnatal organisms, the bone formation process involves both physiological growth and remodeling and pathological repair and regeneration (i.e., following injury). Bone is well understood as a composite material that consists of a hydrated, collagen-rich extracellular matrix and carbonated calcium phosphate.1 However, the fundamental chemical mechanisms dictating the formation of an organized composite are unknown. A clearer understanding of the chemistry of bone formation can lead to improved preAddress all correspondence to Michael D. Morris, Department of Chemistry, 930 North University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1055. Tel: (734) 764-7360; Fax: (734) 764-8815; E-mail: [email protected] vention and therapy for congenital deformities and metabolic disorders as well as for fracture management. The thermodynamically most stable mineral in bone is a nonstoichiometric calcium phosphate arranged in an apatitic lattice, although there may be other mineral phases present in the earliest stages of mineralization.2 In fully mineralized lamellar bone, the calcium phosphate lattice contains substantial amounts of carbonate and small, but readily observable, amounts of monohydrogen phosphate. Smaller amounts of ï¬uoride, chloride and other ions may also be present. As bone advances from the initial stages of formation to full maturity, the degree of lattice substitution and mineralization varies. In less mineralized bone there is a larger relative amount of monohydrogen phosphate and a smaller relative amount of carbonate.3,4 Bone macroscopic structure may be classiï¬ed as cortical or trabecular. Cortical bone is dense, compact bone primarily located in the diaphysis or cen1083-3668/99/$10.00 © 1999 SPIE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS JANUARY 1999 VOL. 4 NO. 1 SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF PHOSPHATE SPECIES tral length of long bones. Cortical bone is continuously renewed through a process called remodeling. Tissue is resorbed and then replaced in a temporally and spatially coupled process. The process that mediates cortical remodeling begins with osteoclasts tunneling through the tissue mass creating their own vascular supply and following a trajectory nearly parallel to the shaft of the diaphysis. The tissue newly synthesized by the osteoblasts forms an osteon, a tubular structure with concentric lamellae. Mineralization within an osteon occurs at a changing rate with the ï¬rst 60% of the mineral being deposited very rapidly and the remainder very slowly.5 Different sectors of the cortical diaphysis are remodeled at different rates, likely due to regional variations in mechanical demands.6 Within a sector bone turnover is relatively uniform, leading to subtle mineral gradients within the tissue. Trabecular bone, or spongy bone, consists of plates and rods that create a lattice-like structure. This structure provides a large effective surface area resulting in enhanced load distribution and energy absorption. Trabecular bone is located at the ends of long bones in the metaphysis and in vertebrae. Like cortical bone, remodeling in trabecular bone is also accomplished through resorption coupled to formation, but the resulting microstructure is different from that of osteons. Bone at the surface of a rod or plate is replaced by a longitudinal bundle of tissue called a trabecular packet. Lamellae are oriented along the length of the packet. Calcium homeostasis causes remodeling in trabecular tissue to occur more frequently than in cortical tissue, and the newly deposited packets located at the surfaces of trabeculae are much less calciï¬ed than the more central tissue, leading to sharp mineral gradients across trabecular plates and rods.7 Vibrational spectroscopy has a long history in bone and tooth chemistry. Most work has been performed in the infrared, because protein ï¬uorescence has hindered Raman spectroscopy with the green lasers that dominated practice until the mid1980s. Typically, bone Raman spectra have been obtained on deproteinated specimens. Although it is possible that the deproteination process generates artifacts, this approach has allowed the acquisition of mineral spectra of mature and newly formed bone with green laser excitation.8 In recent years, the use of near-infrared lasers has solved the protein ï¬uorescence problem. Fourier transform (FT)Raman spectroscopy has been used to obtain mineral and protein Raman spectra from bone.9,10 In the wake of recent technological advances, vibrational spectroscopic imaging is becoming increasingly popular for the analysis of complex organized systems, such as bones and teeth. For example, de Grauw et al. have used Raman microscopy to achieve 0.5 m spatial resolution at 512 points along a line at the interface between crystal- line calcium phosphate and a section of bone.11 Dental adhesive diffusion into dentin has been imaged using Raman microspectroscopy.12 Marcott et al. have reported 4096 pixel (33 m 33 m pixels) infrared spectroscopic images of canine alveolar bone tissue.13 They showed matrix and mineral images, as well as a mineral maturity image. We have reported hyperspectral Raman images of mature and newly regenerated canine trabecular bone with 20 000 pixel (1.4 m 1.4 m pixel) deï¬nition.14 The images clearly showed the lowest phosphate (POâ3) content in the newly modeled 4 bone. They also demonstrated that there is a severe spectral overlap between the methacrylate mounting media and phosphate 1 (958 cmâ1). Multivariate data reduction has been widely used in magnetic resonance imaging15 and ï¬uorescence imaging.16 Our group has employed factor analysis to extract information from sets of 500â2000 solution Raman spectra.17 We have applied the same technique to Raman imaging to generate chemical composition contrast in bone14 and in aluminosilicate glasses18 and crystallinity contrast in syndiotactic polystyrene.19 2 EXPERIMENTAL DATA All bone samples were obtained from the Orthopaedic Research Laboratories at the University of Michigan. In the current study both canine trabecular and human cortical bone were imaged. 2.1 TRABECULAR BONE SPECIMENS A specimen was obtained from canine tibia in which osteotomy surgery was performed and new bone was allowed to spontaneously regenerate within the osteotomy gap. The gap tissue was excised, ï¬xed in 70% ethanol, embedded in a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) resin using standard protocols, and sectioned into 40 15 0.02 mm slices. Because bone formation occurs from the surgical margin inward, this specimen contained new bone with a maturity/mineralization gradient, i.e., with the least mature bone nearest the center of the osteotomy gap. Slices were mounted on a standard glass microscope slide, as shown in Figure 1, so that the gradient of bone formation was along the long dimension of the slide. The bone specimen was imaged at two locations along the mineralization gradient. Area A was mature bone that was a distance from the defect wall and area B was in the bone formation region, i.e., the trabecular bone in its earliest phases of mineralization. 2.2 CORTICAL BONE SPECIMENS For comparison to trabecular bone, a fresh, unï¬xed transverse section of human cortical bone was imaged. The specimen was an anterior femur diaphysis of a 41-year-old male obtained from the UniverJOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS JANUARY 1999 VOL. 4 NO. 1 TIMLIN ET AL. Table 1 Raman band assignments for bone. Canine Human trabecular bone osteonal bone Band positiona (cmâ1) (cmâ1) (cmâ1) 598 958 Vibration POâ3, 4 POâ3, 4 HPOâ2, 4 POâ3, 4 Fig. 1 Schematic of a mounted canine trabecular bone specimen. This is a longitudinal cross section of a cylindrical defect showing the bone mineralization gradient along the long axis. COâ2, 3 Amide III COâ2, C=O 3 stretch C-H bending Amide I 583 960 1003 1028â1055 1070 1245 1270 1450 1660 1000 1032 1065 1243 1274 (weak) 1450 Not observed From Refs. 9 and 10. 99.99+% of the total signal generated. The number of components to be retained was determined by inspection of the scree plots of the eigenvalues and conï¬rmed by inspection of the score images of the ï¬rst few eigenvectors. Although the eigenvectors retained give a mathematical representation of the chemical species in the data, they are linear combinations of the underlying Raman spectra and the eigenvectors must be rotated to have physical meaning, i.e., in order to represent Raman spectra. The factor rotation was guided by non-negativity and by second-derivative constraints that are known to be valid for Raman spectra. 3 SPECTROSCOPIC CONSIDERATIONS Table 1 lists mineral and matrix Raman bands of trabecular and cortical bone identiï¬ed in this study as well as in previous work.10,21 Representative spectra from the specimens are shown in Figure 2. Fig. 2 Representative Raman spectra of PMMA-mounted canine trabecular bone and fresh human cortical bone. The small arrow indicates the phosphate 1 band, which is a shoulder on the stronger PMMA band. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS JANUARY 1999 VOL. 4 NO. 1 SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF PHOSPHATE SPECIES Fig. 3 (a) Bright-ï¬eld transmission image of canine trabecular bone, 200 m 400 m. (b) Bright-ï¬eld reï¬ectance image of human cortical bone 800 m 1400 m. Fig. 4 Factors and score images of a 275 m 140 m region of mature canine trabecular bone strut. (a) POâ3; (b) HPOâ2. The 4 4 score image contrast was adjusted for clarity. In mature bone, the principal spectroscopic markers are the POâ3 asymmetric stretch ( 3 , 1030 cmâ1) 4 and the POâ3 symmetric stretch ( 1 , 960 cmâ1).22 4 Because the mineral lattice is heavily substituted with carbonate, the carbonate bands at 1070 and 1270 cmâ1 are readily identiï¬ed. In newly formed bone and in matrix vesicles spectral bands characteristic of monohydrogen phosphate (HPOâ2) are 4 seen. Collagen bands are also observed. Figure 2 shows spectra from both specimens. The solid spectrum clearly demonstrates the spectral interference of the mounting media, PMMA, and of POâ3 1 . An arrow points to the POâ3 band that 4 4 appears as a shoulder on a much larger PMMA band. The most common alternative mounting media, epoxy based resins, have a clear window around the phosphate 1 stretch, but interfere with the HPOâ2 stretch near 1000 cmâ1. In general, the 4 spectrum of any mounting medium is likely to overlap at least some bands in the bone spectrum. Only unï¬xed unmounted bone completely avoids the spectral interference problem. However, it is necessary to image unmounted bone frozen or in an anaerobic chamber to prevent bacterial growth. 4 RAMAN IMAGES OF MATURE AND NEWLY FORMED TRABECULAR BONE Figure 3 contains light microscope images of the two bone specimens. Small regions of these specimens were chosen for Raman imaging. The appearance of both specimens is normal. Figure 4 shows two factors and their corresponding score (Raman factor contrast) images from mature trabecular bone. A total of six factors is needed to describe the data set. Two of these are the Raman background and residual ï¬uorescence, probably from iron. Another two are PMMA Raman scatter.14 These factors do not contain information on bone chemistry and are not shown here. The factor of Figure 4(a) is representative of the Raman signal from POâ3 and that of Figure 4(b) in4 dicative of the Raman signal from HPOâ2. The fac4 tors represent Raman signatures, but do not contain information as to the intensity on the ordinate axis. Instead, information regarding the intensity is located in the intensities of the score images. In a nonstoichiometric material in which the composition varies from point to point factor analysis does not necessarily yield complete Raman spectra. Instead, the factors correspond to the signatures of spatially varying structural motifs or components such as ions. Similar behavior is observed in aluminosilicate glasses.18 The POâ3 factor is dominated by the 958 cmâ1 4 band and the score image maps the location of the most fully mineralized bone strut. The HPOâ2 factor 4 is dominated by the 1000 cmâ1 band and maps incompletely mineralized bone. This bone specimen is mature bone, but even in mature bone there are sites of remodeling where new bone formation and regeneration occur to some extent. In trabecular bone, remodeling occurs from the surface, so the most mature bone is located in the interior of the mineralized region. The degree of bone maturity decreases toward the edges of each strut. In addition, the surfaces of the trabeculae have a region of relatively unmineralized bone (osteoid). As a result, these surfaces present an opportunity to observe a phosphate ion gradient. Figure 4(b) shows areas of incompletely mineralized bone. These are clearest at the right edge of the strut. Previously researchers have concluded there would be no penetration of the PMMA into mature bone.23 Therefore we would expect the PMMA and phosphate images to be complementary, as we have shown.14 The score images shown are all of 275 m 140 m areas, with spectral resolution of 8 cmâ1. None of the images has been smoothed. We deï¬ne our spatial resolution to be the length of 2 pixels, or 2.8 m. Using the Rayleigh criterion at 850 nm, the wavelength of a 1000 cmâ1 Raman shift, the diffraction-limited spatial resolution for our 5 / 0.25 NA objective is approximately 2.1 m.24 The JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS JANUARY 1999 VOL. 4 NO. 1 TIMLIN ET AL. Fig. 5 Factors and score images of a 275 m 140 m region of newly modeled canine trabecular bone strut. (a) POâ3; (b) HPOâ2. 4 4 The score image contrast was adjusted for clarity. Fig. 6 Phosphate ion distribution across a newly modeled trabecular strut (normalized for total intensity). measured width of the line projected on the specimen is 2.6 0.2 m. Although we have not done so here, it is possible to design transfer optics to project a larger image on the spectrograph slit. That change and a 1.3 m stage increment could be used to generate images with somewhat better spatial resolution. Of course, much better spatial resolution can be achieved by operating with an objective of higher NA. In these experiments we have traded resolution for a larger ï¬eld of view. In Figure 5 the POâ3 and HPOâ2 score images for 4 4 newly modeled trabecular bone are shown. Again, these images are derived from two of the six factors needed to describe the data. The four background and the PMMA factors are not shown. The ï¬eld of view and spectral and spatial resolutions are the same as those in the mature bone specimen image of Figure 4. The POâ3 score image, Figure 5(a), does reveal 4 some mineralization, but it is discontinuous and the Raman contrast is less intense than it is in mature bone. In fact, to make the contrast visible for reproduction in print, the POâ3 contrast in Figure 5(a) has 4 been stretched threefold. This adjustment was not necessary for the mature bone POâ3 score image of 4 Figure 4(a), or for any other image shown in this article. In the newly formed bone small amounts of PMMA can be found penetrating into the mineralized region. Polymer penetration occurs in this case because the bone matrix is not yet completely mineralized. A comparison of Figures 5(a) and 5(b), which contains the HPOâ2 score image, shows that 4 the HPOâ2 is located spatially along the edges of the 4 strut as it is in the mature bone region. In the newly modeled bone, however, the HPOâ2 region is fairly 4 uniform and extends approximately 20 m into the POâ3 region. HPOâ2 is also found outside the POâ3 4 4 4 boundary. This phosphate is probably in trabecular packets. The Raman contrast along a representative line through the strut is plotted in Figure 6. The plot 5 RAMAN IMAGES OF AN OSTEONAL REGION OF FRESH CORTICAL BONE In contrast to the trabecular bone specimen, factor analysis of the cortical bone specimen does not yield separate factors for POâ3 and HPOâ2. Instead, 4 4 a single factor representing mineral content is recovered. This factor contains characteristic frequencies of POâ3 and HPOâ2. This factor and the mineral 4 4 content score image are shown in Figure 7. The 10 000 pixel image is 140 m 140 m at 2.8 m spatial resolution, 8 cmâ1 spectral resolution. Because only one mineral factor can be isolated, the spatial distribution of the two phosphate ions must be identical to within the resolution limits of our imaging system. To verify this interpretation of our data, we generated univariate images from the integrated areas Fig. 7 The mineral content factor and the score image of a 275 m 140 m region of human cortical bone. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS JANUARY 1999 VOL. 4 NO. 1 SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF PHOSPHATE SPECIES
Journal of Biomedical Optics – SPIE
Published: Jan 1, 1999
Keywords: Raman imaging; cortical bone; trabecular bone; microscopy
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.