Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Neuropsychological studies of verbal semantic systems

Neuropsychological studies of verbal semantic systems <jats:p>The selective impairment of verbal comprehension in patients with cerebral lesions provides a powerful and direct source of evidence regarding the properties of verbal semantic systems. Word frequency is shown to be an important determinant of performance for both spoken and written word comprehension, indicating that the aphasic patient may have a quantitative reduction in capacity according to task difficulty. But this cannot be an exhaustive account. Evidence for the vulnerability of subordinate as compared with superordinate information is reported, which it is argued indicates that the semantic representations of single words are hierarchical or ordered in their degree of specificity. Finally, evidence is presented for selective impairments of the comprehension of words from particular semantic categories. Double dissociations of deficits of the concrete-abstract and of objects-non-object concepts are reported. It is argued that the verbal semantic meaning systems are categorically organized</jats:p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences CrossRef

Neuropsychological studies of verbal semantic systems

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences , Volume 295 (1077): 411-423 – Oct 2, 1981

Neuropsychological studies of verbal semantic systems


Abstract

<jats:p>The selective impairment of verbal comprehension in patients with cerebral lesions provides a powerful and direct source of evidence regarding the properties of verbal semantic systems. Word frequency is shown to be an important determinant of performance for both spoken and written word comprehension, indicating that the aphasic patient may have a quantitative reduction in capacity according to task difficulty. But this cannot be an exhaustive account. Evidence for the vulnerability of subordinate as compared with superordinate information is reported, which it is argued indicates that the semantic representations of single words are hierarchical or ordered in their degree of specificity. Finally, evidence is presented for selective impairments of the comprehension of words from particular semantic categories. Double dissociations of deficits of the concrete-abstract and of objects-non-object concepts are reported. It is argued that the verbal semantic meaning systems are categorically organized</jats:p>

Loading next page...
 
/lp/crossref/neuropsychological-studies-of-verbal-semantic-systems-4JkzAXUnXU

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CrossRef
ISSN
0080-4622
DOI
10.1098/rstb.1981.0149
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:p>The selective impairment of verbal comprehension in patients with cerebral lesions provides a powerful and direct source of evidence regarding the properties of verbal semantic systems. Word frequency is shown to be an important determinant of performance for both spoken and written word comprehension, indicating that the aphasic patient may have a quantitative reduction in capacity according to task difficulty. But this cannot be an exhaustive account. Evidence for the vulnerability of subordinate as compared with superordinate information is reported, which it is argued indicates that the semantic representations of single words are hierarchical or ordered in their degree of specificity. Finally, evidence is presented for selective impairments of the comprehension of words from particular semantic categories. Double dissociations of deficits of the concrete-abstract and of objects-non-object concepts are reported. It is argued that the verbal semantic meaning systems are categorically organized</jats:p>

Journal

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological SciencesCrossRef

Published: Oct 2, 1981

There are no references for this article.