Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Paxinos, Charles Watson (1983)
The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates
J. Evenden (1999)
Impulsivity: a discussion of clinical and experimental findingsJournal of Psychopharmacology, 13
A. Bechara, Hanna Damasio, A. Damasio (2000)
Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex.Cerebral cortex, 10 3
L. Miller (1985)
Cognitive risk-taking after frontal or temporal lobectomy—I. The synthesis of fragmented visual informationNeuropsychologia, 23
R. Kesner (2000)
Subregional analysis of mnemonic functions of the prefrontal cortex in the ratPsychobiology
A. Logue (1994)
Self-Control: Waiting Until Tomorrow for What You Want Today
R. Rogers, B. Everitt, Alexia Baldacchino, A. Blackshaw, R. Swainson, Katie Wynne, N. Baker, J. Hunter, T. Carthy, E. Booker, M. London, J. Deakin, B. Sahakian, T. Robbins (1999)
Dissociable Deficits in the Decision-Making Cognition of Chronic Amphetamine Abusers, Opiate Abusers, Patients with Focal Damage to Prefrontal Cortex, and Tryptophan-Depleted Normal Volunteers: Evidence for Monoaminergic MechanismsNeuropsychopharmacology, 20
B. Kolb (1984)
Functions of the frontal cortex of the rat: A comparative reviewBrain Research Reviews, 8
G. Schoenbaum, A. Chiba, M. Gallagher (1998)
Orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala encode expected outcomes during learningNature Neuroscience, 1
L. Tremblay, W. Schultz (1999)
Relative reward preference in primate orbitofrontal cortexNature, 398
H. Rachlin (1995)
Self-control: Beyond commitment.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18
J. Mazur (1987)
An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement.
L. Miller (1992)
Impulsivity, risk-taking, and the ability to synthesize fragmented information after frontal lobectomyNeuropsychologia, 30
W. Schultz (2000)
Multiple reward signals in the brainNature Reviews Neuroscience, 1
M. Ho, S. Al-Zahrani, A. Al-Ruwaitea, C. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi (1998)
5-Hydroxytryptamine and impulse control: prospects for a behavioural analysisJournal of Psychopharmacology, 12
M. Gallagher, R. McMahan, G. Schoenbaum (1999)
Orbitofrontal Cortex and Representation of Incentive Value in Associative LearningThe Journal of Neuroscience, 19
Shibley Rahman, B. Sahakian, John Hodges, Robert Rogers, Trevor Robbins (1999)
Specific cognitive deficits in mild frontal variant frontotemporal dementia.Brain : a journal of neurology, 122 ( Pt 8)
J. Hollerman, L. Tremblay, W. Schultz (2000)
Involvement of basal ganglia and orbitofrontal cortex in goal-directed behavior.Progress in brain research, 126
L. Miller, B. Milner (1985)
Cognitive risk-taking after frontal or temporal lobectomy—II. The synthesis of phonemic and semantic informationNeuropsychologia, 23
S. Mobini, T.-J. Chiang, M. Ho, C. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi (2000)
Effects of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcementPsychopharmacology, 152
J. Monterosso, G. Ainslie (1999)
Beyond discounting: possible experimental models of impulse controlPsychopharmacology, 146
J. O’Doherty, M. Kringelbach, M. Kringelbach, E. Rolls, J. Hornak, C. Andrews (2001)
Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortexNature Neuroscience, 4
J. Mazur (1997)
Choice, delay, probability, and conditioned reinforcementAnimal Learning & Behavior, 25
A. Bechara, A. Damasio, H. Damasio, S. Anderson (1994)
Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortexCognition, 50
R. Shull, C. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi, C. Lowe (1982)
Quantification of Steady-State Operant BehaviorAmerican Journal of Psychology, 95
M. Ho, S. Mobini, T.-J. Chiang, C. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi (1999)
Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of ”impulsive choice” behaviour: implications for psychopharmacologyPsychopharmacology, 146
R. Schwarcz, W. Whetsell, R. Mangano (1983)
Quinolinic acid: an endogenous metabolite that produces axon-sparing lesions in rat brain.Science, 219 4582
G. Ainslie (1975)
Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.Psychological bulletin, 82 4
A. Logue (1988)
Research on self-control: An integrating frameworkBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 11
J. Evenden (1999)
Varieties of impulsivityPsychopharmacology, 146
Rationale: Lesions of the orbital prefrontal cortex (OPFC) can cause pathologically impulsive behaviour in humans. Inter-temporal choice behaviour (choice between reinforcers differing in size, delay and/or probability) has been proposed as a model of "impulsive choice" in animals. Objective: The effect of lesions of the OPFC on rats' inter-temporal choice behaviour was examined in two experiments: (1) rats chose between a smaller immediate reinforcer and a larger delayed reinforcer; (2) rats chose between a smaller certain reinforcer and a larger probabilistic reinforcer. Methods: Under halothane anaesthesia, rats received injections of the excitotoxin quinolinate into the OPFC (0.1 M, 0.5 µl, two injections in each hemisphere), or sham lesions (injections of vehicle). They were trained to press two levers (A and B) for food-pellet reinforcers in discrete-trials schedules. In free-choice trials, a press on A resulted in immediate delivery of one food pellet; a press on B resulted in delivery of two pellets, either following a delay (d) (experiment 1), or with a probability (p) <1 (experiment 2). The values of d and p were manipulated across phases of the experiments. The locations of the lesions were verified histologically at the end of the experiment. Results: In experiment 1, both groups showed declining choice of lever B as a function of d. The lesioned rats showed significantly shorter indifference delays (D 50 : the value of d corresponding to 50% choice of lever B) than the sham-lesioned rats. In experiment 2, both groups showed declining choice of lever B as a function of the odds against delivery of the two-pellet reinforcer, θ (θ =[1/p]–1). The lesioned rats showed lower indifference odds (θ 50 : the value of θ corresponding to 50% choice of lever B) than the sham-lesioned rats. In both experiments, the lesioned rats showed extensive atrophy of the OPFC, with sparing of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Conclusions: The results show that lesions of the OPFC can promote preference for the smaller and more immediate, and the smaller and more certain of two reinforcers. The results are consistent with two interpretations: the lesion may have altered (i) the rates of delay and odds discounting, and/or (ii) sensitivity to the ratio of the sizes of the two reinforcers.
Psychopharmacology – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 25, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.