Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Priming Effects in Semantic Classification Tasks

Priming Effects in Semantic Classification Tasks Six experiments were conducted on priming in semantic classification tasks that allow free play between perceptual and semantic processes. Priming was greatest when words were repeated on the same semantic task at study and test but was absent when repeated words were classified on different semantic tasks (size and man-made; Experiment 1). Thus, merely repeating perceptual information is not sufficient to produce priming. Priming was obtained, however, when items on the same semantic task were repeated in different formats (words and pictures; Experiment 2). Consistent with stage models of single-word reading, priming was obtained when a semantic classification task was followed by a word form task (i.e., lexical classification or naming) but not when it was preceded by the word form task (Experiments 3 and 4). Priming was also found across lexical tasks that both involve the word form (Experiment 5) and across classification tasks that refer to the same semantic domain (overall size and relative dimensions; Experiment 6). Results suggest that priming is determined by the overlap in the component processes of the study and test tasks. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition American Psychological Association

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/priming-effects-in-semantic-classification-tasks-81fi10xBi8

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0278-7393
eISSN
1939-1285
DOI
10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.933
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Six experiments were conducted on priming in semantic classification tasks that allow free play between perceptual and semantic processes. Priming was greatest when words were repeated on the same semantic task at study and test but was absent when repeated words were classified on different semantic tasks (size and man-made; Experiment 1). Thus, merely repeating perceptual information is not sufficient to produce priming. Priming was obtained, however, when items on the same semantic task were repeated in different formats (words and pictures; Experiment 2). Consistent with stage models of single-word reading, priming was obtained when a semantic classification task was followed by a word form task (i.e., lexical classification or naming) but not when it was preceded by the word form task (Experiments 3 and 4). Priming was also found across lexical tasks that both involve the word form (Experiment 5) and across classification tasks that refer to the same semantic domain (overall size and relative dimensions; Experiment 6). Results suggest that priming is determined by the overlap in the component processes of the study and test tasks.

Journal

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and CognitionAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Jul 1, 1995

There are no references for this article.