Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Developmental Changes in Achievement Evaluation: Motivational Implications of Self‐Other Differences

Developmental Changes in Achievement Evaluation: Motivational Implications of Self‐Other Differences In order to explore the development of self‐evaluative biases, children at 3 age levels (5–6, 7–8, 9–10) evaluated themselves or another child when given social or temporal comparison feedback. Evaluative biases were indicated by higher evaluations for the self than another, especially after failure. Children at different ages were not differentially responsive to temporal vs. social comparison information. However, evaluative bias in response to the type of evaluation differed by age; there was greater bias for general ability evaluations by older children and greater bias for specific performance evaluations by younger children. Alternative explanations for these self‐other differences were minimized, as differences in visual orientation were held constant and differences in knowledge of effort were controlled statistically. Other aspects of the design as well as sex differences support a motivational interpretation of these biases. How these biases are manifested is related to children's level of understanding and concerns at different ages. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Child Development Wiley

Developmental Changes in Achievement Evaluation: Motivational Implications of Self‐Other Differences

Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/developmental-changes-in-achievement-evaluation-motivational-8hxbW9WK22

References (24)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0009-3920
eISSN
1467-8624
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00805.x
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In order to explore the development of self‐evaluative biases, children at 3 age levels (5–6, 7–8, 9–10) evaluated themselves or another child when given social or temporal comparison feedback. Evaluative biases were indicated by higher evaluations for the self than another, especially after failure. Children at different ages were not differentially responsive to temporal vs. social comparison information. However, evaluative bias in response to the type of evaluation differed by age; there was greater bias for general ability evaluations by older children and greater bias for specific performance evaluations by younger children. Alternative explanations for these self‐other differences were minimized, as differences in visual orientation were held constant and differences in knowledge of effort were controlled statistically. Other aspects of the design as well as sex differences support a motivational interpretation of these biases. How these biases are manifested is related to children's level of understanding and concerns at different ages.

Journal

Child Development – Wiley

Published: Aug 1, 1994

There are no references for this article.