Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Population genomics: celebrating individual expression

Population genomics: celebrating individual expression Heredity (2003) 90, 1–5 NEWS AND COMMENTARY & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0018-067X/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/hdy in considerable statistical power (Kerr and Churchill, 2001). Since only nine of ............................................................... the genes would be expected to differ among any contrasts at the 1% level by Population genomics: celebrating chance, 161 genes is an impressive fraction of the transcriptome. Even individual expression after correction for the 907 comparisons, 37 genes remained significant, with G Gibson among-individual differences of two- .................................................................................................................. fold or more. Heredity (2003) 90, 1–2. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800195 Fewer differences were detected among populations than between indi- viduals. The power of this analysis was uture efforts to map genotype onto Fundulus is the genus of minnows that not the same as that for the between- phenotype may well use gene expres- are famous in evolutionary genetic individual comparison, but only 15 F sion profiling alongside scanning for circles as a model for physiological genes were seen to differ at the 1% level association between genetic variants and adaptation to temperature (Podrabsky among the three populations. Overall, traits. The basic idea is similar, but the et al, 2000). The cline of activity there was a trend for the genes that http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Heredity Springer Journals

Population genomics: celebrating individual expression

Gibson, G
Heredity , Volume 90 (1) – Jan 9, 2003
Download PDF
2 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/population-genomics-celebrating-individual-expression-8lqirdpWv9

References (4)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by The Genetics Society
Subject
Biomedicine; Biomedicine, general; Human Genetics; Evolutionary Biology; Ecology; Cytogenetics; Plant Genetics and Genomics
ISSN
0018-067X
eISSN
1365-2540
DOI
10.1038/sj.hdy.6800195
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Heredity (2003) 90, 1–5 NEWS AND COMMENTARY & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0018-067X/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/hdy in considerable statistical power (Kerr and Churchill, 2001). Since only nine of ............................................................... the genes would be expected to differ among any contrasts at the 1% level by Population genomics: celebrating chance, 161 genes is an impressive fraction of the transcriptome. Even individual expression after correction for the 907 comparisons, 37 genes remained significant, with G Gibson among-individual differences of two- .................................................................................................................. fold or more. Heredity (2003) 90, 1–2. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800195 Fewer differences were detected among populations than between indi- viduals. The power of this analysis was uture efforts to map genotype onto Fundulus is the genus of minnows that not the same as that for the between- phenotype may well use gene expres- are famous in evolutionary genetic individual comparison, but only 15 F sion profiling alongside scanning for circles as a model for physiological genes were seen to differ at the 1% level association between genetic variants and adaptation to temperature (Podrabsky among the three populations. Overall, traits. The basic idea is similar, but the et al, 2000). The cline of activity there was a trend for the genes that

Journal

Heredity – Springer Journals

Published: Jan 9, 2003

There are no references for this article.