Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Sectional of of Vol. XLII Proceedinas the Royal Society Medicine 31 , th 697 page Section of Anaesthetics F.F.A. President-RONALD JARMAN, D.S.C., R.C.S. [April 1, 1949] AN,ESTHETIC RESPONSIBILITY Mr. W. R. H. Coroner East Heddy (His Majesty's for London): In strict law what is the duty of the anesthetist towards his patient? The answer that would be generally given, I suppose, would be that it is his duty to take care. And that answer, though it would not be complete, would not be wrong. Let us of this so far as it would be a one. see, then, first all, why answer, goes, right It would be right in the first place because in law such a in this case in duty does, fact, exist. How this exist? and why does duty There is in law to exercise care to no general obligation cast upon everyone everyone else in any and every circumstance. There is, so to speak, no universal compulsion to take care. As Lord Esher, Master of the Rolls, remarked in the case of Lelievre v. Gould: "A man may be as negligent as he pleases towards the whole world unless he owes them a duty." In
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine – SAGE
Published: Sep 1, 1949
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.