Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Taylor, K. Spence (1952)
The relationship of anxiety level to performance in serial learning.Journal of experimental psychology, 44 2
This is an a priori assumption based on the original factor analysis and the relationship of the IS to "factored" tests in the current study. As noted earlier
R. Thouless (1939)
Experimental PsychologyNature, 143
J. Taylor (1953)
A personality scale of manifest anxiety.Journal of abnormal psychology, 48 2
D. Twain (1957)
Factor analysis of a particular aspect of behavioral control: impulsivity.Journal of clinical psychology, 13 2
E. Barratt (1953)
An Analysis of Verbal Reports of Solving Spatial Problems as an Aid in Defining Spatial FactorsThe Journal of Psychology, 36
J. Wishner (1955)
The concept of efficiency in psychological health and in psychopathology.Psychological review, 62 1
F. Wilcoxon (1950)
SOME RAPID APPROXIMATE STATISTICAL PROCEDURESAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 52
W. Zimmerman (1954)
The Influence of Item Complexity Upon the Factor Composition of a Spatial Visualization TestEducational and Psychological Measurement, 14
A. Shephard, D. Abbey (1958)
Manifest Anxiety and Performance on a Complex Perceptual-Motor TaskPerceptual and Motor Skills, 8
K. Spence (1958)
A theory of emotionally based drive (D) and its relation to performance in simple learning situations.American Psychologist, 13
E. Montague (1953)
The role of anxiety in serial rote learning.Journal of experimental psychology, 45 2
J. Taylor (1958)
The effects of anxiety level and psychological stress on verbal learning.Journal of abnormal psychology, 57 1
O. Mowrer (1951)
Two-factor learning theory: summary and comment.Psychological review, 58 5
E. Barratt (1955)
The Space-Visualization Factors Related to Temperament TraitsThe Journal of Psychology, 39
Perceptual alzd Motor Skills, 1959, 9, 191-198. @ Southern Universities Press 1959 ANXIETY AND IMPULSIVENESS RELATED TO PSYCHOMOTOR EFFICIENCY1# ERNEST S. BARRATT Texas Christian University The purpose of this experiment was to relate operationally defined mea- sures of anxiety and impulsiveness to psychomotor learning in a conflict situ- ation. Many recent experiments (4, 6) have related anxiety to learning tasks of varying levels of difficulty, but none have related both anxiety and impulsive- ness to learning among Ss selected from a common population. In studies relating anxiety to learning, high anxiety Ss consistently learn better on the average than low anxiety Ss when the difficulty level of the task is low (6, 8). In more difficult learning tasks, low anxiety Ss do better than high anxiety Ss (3, 5, 8, 9), although the results are not as consistent as with easier tasks. Taylor (8) found, for example, that under non-stress conditions, high anxiety Ss were superior to low anxiety Ss in learning a verbal task, although she did not find any interaction between anxiety level and stress when attempts were made to introduce stress into the learning situation. The current experiment will extend the study of the relation of
Perceptual and Motor Skills – SAGE
Published: Aug 31, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.