Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Labor-Managed and Participatory Firms: A Review Article

Labor-Managed and Participatory Firms: A Review Article JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES Vol. XVII No.3 September 1983 dei Labor-Managed and Participatory Firms: A Review Article Daniel R. FusJeld There is a great deal of literature on the contribution of worker partici­ pation to increased efficiency and improved productivity for the individual production unit. The chief surveys of the evidence for improved produc­ tive performance include R. Blumberg [1968], M. Bosquet [1977], S. Melman [1970], and D. Zwerdling [1978]. J. G. Espinosa and A. S. Zim­ balist [1978], who did a case study of Chilean experience in the early 1970s, provide an excellent bibliography. Much of the evidence is descrip­ tive and anecdotal, however, and there are enough examples of conspicu­ ous failure to indicate that worker participation is far from a universal cure-all for production ills. A new theory of the connection between worker participation and improved productivity has been developed nevertheless. It is argued that worker participation is able to utilize a great deal of knowledge about production that is not available to supervisory or managerial personnel; that participation is a counterweight to produc­ tivity-diminishing managerial decisions motivated by the status and power goals of managers and supervisors; that the psychological effects of par­ ticipation in http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Economic Issues Taylor & Francis

Labor-Managed and Participatory Firms: A Review Article

Journal of Economic Issues , Volume 17 (3): 21 – Sep 1, 1983

Labor-Managed and Participatory Firms: A Review Article

Journal of Economic Issues , Volume 17 (3): 21 – Sep 1, 1983

Abstract

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES Vol. XVII No.3 September 1983 dei Labor-Managed and Participatory Firms: A Review Article Daniel R. FusJeld There is a great deal of literature on the contribution of worker partici­ pation to increased efficiency and improved productivity for the individual production unit. The chief surveys of the evidence for improved produc­ tive performance include R. Blumberg [1968], M. Bosquet [1977], S. Melman [1970], and D. Zwerdling [1978]. J. G. Espinosa and A. S. Zim­ balist [1978], who did a case study of Chilean experience in the early 1970s, provide an excellent bibliography. Much of the evidence is descrip­ tive and anecdotal, however, and there are enough examples of conspicu­ ous failure to indicate that worker participation is far from a universal cure-all for production ills. A new theory of the connection between worker participation and improved productivity has been developed nevertheless. It is argued that worker participation is able to utilize a great deal of knowledge about production that is not available to supervisory or managerial personnel; that participation is a counterweight to produc­ tivity-diminishing managerial decisions motivated by the status and power goals of managers and supervisors; that the psychological effects of par­ ticipation in

 
/lp/taylor-francis/labor-managed-and-participatory-firms-a-review-article-BHUqqAIbd6

References (25)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 1983 by Journal of Economic Issues–Association for Evolutionary Economics.
ISSN
1946-326X
eISSN
0021-3624
DOI
10.1080/00213624.1983.11504156
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES Vol. XVII No.3 September 1983 dei Labor-Managed and Participatory Firms: A Review Article Daniel R. FusJeld There is a great deal of literature on the contribution of worker partici­ pation to increased efficiency and improved productivity for the individual production unit. The chief surveys of the evidence for improved produc­ tive performance include R. Blumberg [1968], M. Bosquet [1977], S. Melman [1970], and D. Zwerdling [1978]. J. G. Espinosa and A. S. Zim­ balist [1978], who did a case study of Chilean experience in the early 1970s, provide an excellent bibliography. Much of the evidence is descrip­ tive and anecdotal, however, and there are enough examples of conspicu­ ous failure to indicate that worker participation is far from a universal cure-all for production ills. A new theory of the connection between worker participation and improved productivity has been developed nevertheless. It is argued that worker participation is able to utilize a great deal of knowledge about production that is not available to supervisory or managerial personnel; that participation is a counterweight to produc­ tivity-diminishing managerial decisions motivated by the status and power goals of managers and supervisors; that the psychological effects of par­ ticipation in

Journal

Journal of Economic IssuesTaylor & Francis

Published: Sep 1, 1983

There are no references for this article.