Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Single-Incision Versus Standard Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy A Multicenter, Case-Controlled Comparison

Single-Incision Versus Standard Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy A Multicenter, Case-Controlled... ORIGINAL ARTICLE Single-Incision Versus Standard Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy A Multicenter, Case-Controlled Comparison ∗ ∗ Bradley J. Champagne, MD, Harry T. Papaconstantinou, MD,† Stavan S. Parmar, MD, Deborah A. Nagle, MD,‡ Tonia M. Young-Fadok, MD,§ Edward C. Lee, MD,¶ and Conor P. Delaney, MD, PhD 8–11 institution series and small retrospective case reviews. Potential Objective: The aim of this study was to compare single-incision laparoscopic disadvantages of this technique include prolonged operative times, colectomy (SILC) to multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC) when per- limited patient applicability, increased costs, and prolongation of the formed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. learning curve. Background: Recent case reports and single institution series have demon- To better assess widespread applicability and outcomes with strated the feasibility of SILC. Few comparative studies for MLC and SILC single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) we sought to include have been reported. data from experienced colorectal surgeons with extensive experience Methods: Patients from 5 institutions undergoing SILC were entered into an in multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC) and SILC. Data were IRB approved database from November 2008 to March 2010. SILC patients entered into a multicenter pooled database. The study was designed were matched with those undergoing MLC for gender, age, disease, surgery, to http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of Surgery Wolters Kluwer Health

Single-Incision Versus Standard Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy A Multicenter, Case-Controlled Comparison

Delaney, Conor P.
Annals of Surgery , Volume 255 (1) – Jan 1, 2012
Download PDF
4 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/single-incision-versus-standard-multiport-laparoscopic-colectomy-a-CQX0ymb6Nx

References (19)

Copyright
© 2011 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
ISSN
0003-4932
eISSN
1528-1140
DOI
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182378442
pmid
22104563
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Single-Incision Versus Standard Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy A Multicenter, Case-Controlled Comparison ∗ ∗ Bradley J. Champagne, MD, Harry T. Papaconstantinou, MD,† Stavan S. Parmar, MD, Deborah A. Nagle, MD,‡ Tonia M. Young-Fadok, MD,§ Edward C. Lee, MD,¶ and Conor P. Delaney, MD, PhD 8–11 institution series and small retrospective case reviews. Potential Objective: The aim of this study was to compare single-incision laparoscopic disadvantages of this technique include prolonged operative times, colectomy (SILC) to multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC) when per- limited patient applicability, increased costs, and prolongation of the formed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. learning curve. Background: Recent case reports and single institution series have demon- To better assess widespread applicability and outcomes with strated the feasibility of SILC. Few comparative studies for MLC and SILC single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) we sought to include have been reported. data from experienced colorectal surgeons with extensive experience Methods: Patients from 5 institutions undergoing SILC were entered into an in multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC) and SILC. Data were IRB approved database from November 2008 to March 2010. SILC patients entered into a multicenter pooled database. The study was designed were matched with those undergoing MLC for gender, age, disease, surgery, to

Journal

Annals of Surgery – Wolters Kluwer Health

Published: Jan 1, 2012

There are no references for this article.