Gerald Sorokin (1992)
The politics of alliance: Security tradeoffs in enduring interstate rivalries.
David Vital, Robert Rothstein (1968)
Alliances and Small PowersInternational Journal, 24
M. Efrat, Jacob Bercovitch (1991)
Superpowers and Client States in the Middle East
Randolph Siverson, Harvey Starr (1991)
The Diffusion of War: A Study of Opportunity and Willingness
Yaacov bar-Siman-Tov (1987)
Israel, the Superpowers, and the War in the Middle East
W. Quandt, David Schoenbaum (1993)
The United States and the State of IsraelPolitical Science Quarterly, 108
Paul Huth, B. Russett (1993)
General Deterrence between Enduring Rivals: Testing Three Competing ModelsAmerican Political Science Review, 87
Disarmament Agency, Compliance (1976)
World military expenditures and arms transfers
W. Quandt (1993)
Peace Process: American Diplomacy and the Arab-Israeli Conflict since 1967
S. Walt (2019)
The Origins of Alliances
J. Greenhut, Yaacov bar-Siman-Tov (1982)
The Israeli-Egyptian War of Attrition, 1969–1970
J. Morrow (1991)
Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of AlliancesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 35
G. Snyder (1984)
The Security Dilemma in Alliance PoliticsWorld Politics, 36
A. Yaniv (1993)
National security and democracy in Israel
Paul Huth (1988)
Extended Deterrence and the Prevention of War
J. Rosenau (1969)
International politics and foreign policy : a reader in research and theory
B. Buzan, M. Mandelbaum (1988)
The Fate of Nations: The Search for National Security in the Nineteenth and Twentieth CenturiesInternational Journal, 44
S. Crosbie (1974)
A Tacit Alliance: France and Israel from Suez to the Six Day War
Daniel Horowitz (1983)
The Israeli Concept of National Security
A. Organski (1991)
The $36 billion bargain : strategy and politics in U.S. assistance to IsraelPolitical Science Quarterly, 106
B. Mesquita, D. Lalman (1992)
War and reason : domestic and international imperatives
Alan Taylor (1991)
The superpowers and the Middle East
This article studies the relationship between alliance formation and general deterrence in regional rivalries. In a game-theoretic model under complete information, an alliance is formed only when the potential ally would not intervene without one and would always intervene with one. General deterrence succeeds under complete information unless the potential attacker is stronger than the target and values the stakes highly, and the potential ally would never intervene. When incomplete information is added to the game, alliances are sometimes formed even when the potential ally's behavior would be unaffected by the alliance. Additionally, general deterrence under incomplete information sometimes fails because of the potential attacker's mistaken beliefs about the probability that the target would win or the potential ally would intervene. The model is illustrated by examining the conflict between Israel and its rivals, Egypt and Syria, taking into account the role of the United States as Israel's potential ally. The combination of game theory and empirical analysis is theoretically richer and empirically more informative than previous analyses of Israeli general deterrence and alliance behavior.
Journal of Conflict Resolution – SAGE
Published: Jun 1, 1994
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.