Justice, liability, and blame: community views and the criminal law
Choice Reviews Online
– Dec 1, 1995
/lp/unpaywall/justice-liability-and-blame-community-views-and-the-criminal-law-CXoj8mA9Nv
References (89)
-
(1980)
Reflections on fe lony-murder -
For example, liability fo r assault, which requires negligently causing bodily injury, would be imposed if the person recklessly or negligently caused such injury -
A. Elwork, B. Sales, James Alfini (1982)
Making jury instructions understandable -
(1982)
Reducing the biasing effe ct of perpetrator attractive ness in jury simulation -
P. Robinson (1984)
Criminal Law Defenses -
(1982)
Making moral judgements. -
P. Foot (1963)
Hart and Honore: Causation in the LawThe Philosophical Review, 72
-
H. Packer (1963)
The Model Penal Code and beyondColumbia Law Review, 63
-
(1979)
Insanity plea: Legislator's view -
M. Silberman (1976)
Toward a theory of criminal deterrence.American Sociological Review, 41
-
P. Rossi, S. Nock (1983)
Measuring social judgments : the factorial survey approachSocial Forces, 12
-
(1985)
Ve rdict According to Conscience: Perspectives on the English Tr ial jury -
A Penal Code Prepa red by the Indian Law Commissioners -
(1994)
The severity of intermediate penal sanc tions: The importance of community perceptions and a psychophysical scale fo r their mea surement -
(1985)
Introduction to Criminology (2d ed -
C. Cowan, W. Thompson, P. Ellsworth (1984)
The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberationLaw and Human Behavior, 8
-
M. Karlovac, J. Darley (1988)
Attribution of Responsibility for Accidents: A Negligence Law AnalogySocial Cognition, 6
-
(1980)
Performance 1 -
Navy veteran with no prior criminal record, is working as a truck driver fo r To m. To m tells Chris he wants him to deliver eight ounces of cocaine -
8 Causation requirements, 181-189 dichotomous vs. continuous functions, 208-2 10 study summary, 188-189 text of scenarios -
Austin Sarat (1977)
Studying American Legal Culture: An Assessment of Survey EvidenceLaw & Society Review, 11
-
See the objective requirements fo r attempt case, Study 1 (6.12 for completed theft versus a maximum of 5.35 fo r an unsuccessful attempted theft); see also the causation case -
N. Finkel (1988)
Insanity on trial -
(1984)
For a discussion of these general principles and how they are manifested in the Code's de tailed rules -
H. Kelley (1967)
Attribution theory in social psychology, 15
-
128 Blameless rule violation. See Excuse, doctrines of "Blameless violation" verdict -
(1990)
Capital fe lony-murder, objective indicia, and community sentiment:' Ari zona Law Review 32 -
(1955)
Co mmonwealth v. Thomas, 382 Pa. 639, 117 A -
United States Sentencing Commission. 1994. Guidelines Ma nual (with Amendments through -
R. Pasewark, D. Seidenzahl (1979)
Opinions concerning the insanity plea and criminality among mental patients.The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 7 2
-
G. Wells, E. Loftus (1984)
Eyewitness testimony : psychological perspectives -
V. Hans, D. Slater (1984)
"Plain crazy:" lay definitions of legal insanity.International journal of law and psychiatry, 7 2
-
E. Jones, K. Davis (1965)
From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2
-
G. Gescheider, E. Catlin, Anne Fontana (1982)
Psychophysical measurement of the judged seriousness of crimes and severity of punishmentsBulletin of the psychonomic society, 19
-
MPC § 2.06(3)(a)(ii) and (4) -
P. Robinson (1985)
Causing the Conditions of One's Own Defense: A Study in the Limits of Theory in Criminal Law DoctrineVirginia Law Review, 71
-
Harold Grasmick, Donald Green (1980)
Legal punishment, social disapproval and internalization as inhibitors of illegal behavior.Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 71
-
M. Erickson, J. Gibbs (1979)
On the Perceived Severity of Legal PenaltiesJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 70
-
Under the Code, citizens are rarely authorized to use deadly fo rce fo r law enforcement pur poses -
A. Hirsch, Nils Jareborg (1991)
Gauging Criminal Harm: A Living-Standard AnalysisOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 11
-
N. Finkel, Raymond Shaw, Susan Bercaw, Juliann Koch (1985)
Insanity defenses: From the jurors' perspective. -
T. Tyler (2021)
Why People Obey the Law -
See the general discussion of the development of the grading scale in Chapter 1. The Model Penal Code has fe wer grades than most codes -
Chris is a Navy veteran with no prior criminal record. Chris meets To m at a baseball game and their fr iendship develops over the course of several weeks -
(1978)
A naive analysis of counteraggression -
Liability means fo r purposeful or knowing killings in other studies range fro m 9 -
P. Robinson (1982)
Criminal Law Defenses: A Systematic AnalysisColumbia Law Review, 82
-
(1982)
Effe cts of defendants' and victims' characteristics on jurors' verdicts -
Rape and gross sexual imposition are offen ses only where the victim is a fe male [MPC § 213.1(1) and (2)). This is also true of statutory rape -
S. Kassin, L. Wrightsman (1979)
On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37
-
R. Kulka, Joan Kessler (1978)
Is Justice Really Blind?–The Influence of Litigant Physical Attractiveness on Juridical Judgment1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8
-
D. Timmer, S. Eitzen (1985)
Criminology: Crime and criminal justice -
The subjects perceive the victimized person as being unaware of a risk of injuring an innocent person -
Code-community conflicts, jury as resolver of -
A System of Penal Law, Code of Procedure -
(1994)
Penal Law § 125 -
Felony-murder and community sentiment: Testing the Su preme Court's assertions -
However, from another perspective, it is worth noting that the act of inviting another per son into one's home is perceived by some as moving toward consenting to sexual intercourse -
But fo r" cause -
Law enforcement authority, 72-79 mistake as to, 72 text of scenarios -
(1977)
Persuasion during the voir dire:' In B -
The one exception is that an unsuccessful attempt to com mit a first-degree fe lony, such as murder, is graded as a second-degree fe lony -
A. Scheflin, J. Dyke (1980)
Jury Nullification: The Contours of a ControversyLaw and contemporary problems, 43
-
(1975)
Public perceptions of criminal behavior: A review of the lit -
4. Despite the fa ct that the Code uses "deviate" intercourse as an aggravation fo r fo rcible rape, it does decriminalize "deviate -
V. Hans (1986)
An Analysis of Public Attitudes Toward the Insanity DefenseCriminology, 24
-
Citizen's law enforcement authority. See Law enforcement authority Civil commitment of insane offender -
R. Chilton, J. Deamicis (1975)
Overcriminalization and the Measurement of Consensus.Sociology and social research
-
Green's report of this phenomenon is contained in chapter 8 of his book -
Stefanie Smith, N. Finkel (1993)
Principals and accessories in capital felony-murder: The proportionality principle reigns supremeLaw & Society Review, 27
-
M. Levi, Shayne Jones (1985)
PUBLIC AND POLICE PERCEPTIONS OF CRIME SERIOUSNESS IN ENGLAND AND WALESBritish Journal of Criminology, 25
-
56 fo r the accomplice, where both are purposeful or knowing as to the killing; 8. 78 fo r the principal versus 7.31 fo r the accomplice, where both are negligent as to the killing) -
(1985)
The Attribution of Blame: Ca usality, Responsibility, Blameworthiness -
R. Meier, W. Johnson (1977)
Deterrence as Social Control: The Legal and Extralegal Production of ConformityAmerican Sociological Review, 42
-
E. Weinrib, M. Kadish, S. Kadish (1975)
Discretion to DisobeyUniversity of Toronto Law Journal, 25
-
J. Darley, T. Shultz (1990)
Moral Rules: Their Content and AcquisitionAnnual Review of Psychology, 41
-
(1988)
The American jury on Trial -
G. Fletcher (1979)
Rethinking Criminal Law -
(1987)
However, this is possible in a sophisticated sentencing system. For examples of how a factor now treated as a minimum requirement might be drafted to alter liability and punishment by degrees -
Stephen Schulhofer (1974)
Harm and Punishment: A Critique of Emphasis on the Results of Conduct in the Criminal LawUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 122
-
This does not extend after a time when the couple are no longer living together as husband and wife -
3 Beating of co-workers scenario -
Legal causer requirement -
H. Steadman, J. Braff (1983)
Defendants Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity -
H. Jacob (1980)
DETERRENT EFFECTS OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL SANCTIONSLaw & Policy, 2
-
(1975)
Hindsight does not equal fo resight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgement under uncertainty -
(1978)
New York: Little, Brown. Fox, V. 1985 -
(1984)
Ha rm to Others: Th e Moral Limits of the Criminal Law -
(1963)
Proposed Revision of the Minnesota Criminal Code
- Publisher
- Unpaywall
- ISSN
- 0009-4978
- DOI
- 10.5860/choice.33-2397
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Journal
Choice Reviews Online – Unpaywall
Published: Dec 1, 1995